<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keeping India out of Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/2009/11/23/keeping-india-out-of-afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/2009/11/23/keeping-india-out-of-afghanistan/</link>
	<description>Lifting the veil on conflict, culture and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muslim Social Networks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/2009/11/23/keeping-india-out-of-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-1845</link>
		<dc:creator>Muslim Social Networks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 19:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/?p=513#comment-1845</guid>
		<description>hmmm nice information but the main thing that we must consider here is the loyalty of the India is really give question about why the india did that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm nice information but the main thing that we must consider here is the loyalty of the India is really give question about why the india did that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: counterfeit detector pen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/2009/11/23/keeping-india-out-of-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>counterfeit detector pen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/?p=513#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>War is cause people to death and many people pain. It is a biggest loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>War is cause people to death and many people pain. It is a biggest loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/2009/11/23/keeping-india-out-of-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/?p=513#comment-452</guid>
		<description>&quot;If Pakistan’s wings are clipped by Indian presence in Afghanistan, it will be done&quot;

Then Pakistan is rightly doing to protect her interest in Afghanistan. Pak is neighbour of afghanistan while india is not and it will real painful for india at the end i think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Pakistan’s wings are clipped by Indian presence in Afghanistan, it will be done&#8221;</p>
<p>Then Pakistan is rightly doing to protect her interest in Afghanistan. Pak is neighbour of afghanistan while india is not and it will real painful for india at the end i think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abass</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/2009/11/23/keeping-india-out-of-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>abass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/?p=513#comment-447</guid>
		<description>Small Business owners are largely forgotten. Thats why I only focus on them. I have experience several members of my family file bankruptcy due to small business failures. I also I suffered through 2 destroyed businesses due to failure however, in my failings I have learned some of the secrets to success. (Who can say they know it all?)
What I like about small business owners is that they are not afraid to take huge risks and lay it all on the line. But, I agree they do need a lot of help with their marketing. I think having them go the social media and email route is not only the least expensive but its also the most effective. Thanks for the stats!


www.onlineuniversalwork.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small Business owners are largely forgotten. Thats why I only focus on them. I have experience several members of my family file bankruptcy due to small business failures. I also I suffered through 2 destroyed businesses due to failure however, in my failings I have learned some of the secrets to success. (Who can say they know it all?)<br />
What I like about small business owners is that they are not afraid to take huge risks and lay it all on the line. But, I agree they do need a lot of help with their marketing. I think having them go the social media and email route is not only the least expensive but its also the most effective. Thanks for the stats!</p>
<p><a href='http://www.onlineuniversalwork.com'>http://www.onlineuniversalwork.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rj</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/2009/11/23/keeping-india-out-of-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>rj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/?p=513#comment-426</guid>
		<description>@Rajeev - Well said ! You have uncovered the hidden message in many of the comments. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rajeev &#8211; Well said ! You have uncovered the hidden message in many of the comments. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajeev</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/2009/11/23/keeping-india-out-of-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>rajeev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/?p=513#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Sharafat:

@The trouble in South Asia is called India. While Gandhi was preaching non-violence, ...............&quot;

Sharafat: Have you ever heard &quot;A little knowledge is a dangerous thing&quot;? This applies perfectly to you. 

Ignoring the irrelevant parts of your breathless rant, I will comment what is relevant to the blog:

@The bottom line is that India is an aggressive and expansionist power, that is why it is present in Afghsnistan. There will be no peace in South Asia unless India is confined to its legitimate borders – not the ones it seeks.&quot;
--If you consider India&#039;s presence in Afghanistan as &quot;aggressive and expansionist&quot;, why this is not applicable to Pakistan that in fact was involved at military/spy agency/diplomatic (with Taliban if one call that diplomacy), training Jihadis against Afghans (Non-Pashthun Afghans in Northern Areas) and against India/Kashmir? India&#039;s involvement is at non-military/Afgnaistan rebuilding in nature and India has spent more than 1 billion $ out of pocket for that. India is rebuilding Afghanistan, instead of destroying the country like Pak-installed govt Taliban did under Pakistan&#039;s watch.

If Pakistan&#039;s wings are clipped by Indian presence in Afghanistan, it will be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharafat:</p>
<p>@The trouble in South Asia is called India. While Gandhi was preaching non-violence, &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Sharafat: Have you ever heard &#8220;A little knowledge is a dangerous thing&#8221;? This applies perfectly to you. </p>
<p>Ignoring the irrelevant parts of your breathless rant, I will comment what is relevant to the blog:</p>
<p>@The bottom line is that India is an aggressive and expansionist power, that is why it is present in Afghsnistan. There will be no peace in South Asia unless India is confined to its legitimate borders – not the ones it seeks.&#8221;<br />
&#8211;If you consider India&#8217;s presence in Afghanistan as &#8220;aggressive and expansionist&#8221;, why this is not applicable to Pakistan that in fact was involved at military/spy agency/diplomatic (with Taliban if one call that diplomacy), training Jihadis against Afghans (Non-Pashthun Afghans in Northern Areas) and against India/Kashmir? India&#8217;s involvement is at non-military/Afgnaistan rebuilding in nature and India has spent more than 1 billion $ out of pocket for that. India is rebuilding Afghanistan, instead of destroying the country like Pak-installed govt Taliban did under Pakistan&#8217;s watch.</p>
<p>If Pakistan&#8217;s wings are clipped by Indian presence in Afghanistan, it will be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rj</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/2009/11/23/keeping-india-out-of-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>rj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/?p=513#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Sanjeev Miglani,
&quot;India is the hegemon in South Asia&quot; - Really !!
How can you forget China my friend?
I am extremely surprised at this statement coming from a person of Indian origin (unless you want to believe otherwise).
Aren&#039;t you aware that China&#039;s GDP is way too higher than India&#039;s, let alone Afghanistan. 
Why is it that there is no Chinese involvement in building Afghanistan? If there is, then no one has possibly covered  it, correct?
All this rhetoric about India building a strategic influence on Afghanistan so as to have an edge over Pakistan, is clearly rubbish and bulls**t.
India is doing what the UN, US and NATO forces should be focusing on. And I am sure all those who understand South Asian region, can easily gauge who wants India out of Afghanistan and why !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Sanjeev Miglani,<br />
&#8220;India is the hegemon in South Asia&#8221; &#8211; Really !!<br />
How can you forget China my friend?<br />
I am extremely surprised at this statement coming from a person of Indian origin (unless you want to believe otherwise).<br />
Aren&#8217;t you aware that China&#8217;s GDP is way too higher than India&#8217;s, let alone Afghanistan.<br />
Why is it that there is no Chinese involvement in building Afghanistan? If there is, then no one has possibly covered  it, correct?<br />
All this rhetoric about India building a strategic influence on Afghanistan so as to have an edge over Pakistan, is clearly rubbish and bulls**t.<br />
India is doing what the UN, US and NATO forces should be focusing on. And I am sure all those who understand South Asian region, can easily gauge who wants India out of Afghanistan and why !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rj</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/2009/11/23/keeping-india-out-of-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>rj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/?p=513#comment-423</guid>
		<description>@Sharafat
There are somethings in your comment which are true, but most of it is clearly &#039;BS&#039;. And I don&#039;t blame you totally for it. Its how people in Pakistan are made to believe about India, and vice versa in India as well.
The blame should go to the respective media of both countries who are just enjoying the game.
But post 26/11, I can surely say that India has got a much needed wake up call, and hopefully past mistakes wont be repeated. I hope Pakistan too learns from whats happening on ground right now and recognizes the real enemy. India is not, was never, and never will be, an enemy to Pakistan; and its really painful and sad to know that even today, most Pakistanis think the other way.
As for Gandhi, he was the one who forced the INC to agree with Jinnah&#039;s two nation theory. Had it not been for his resolve to let Jinnah have his way, Pakistan would not have been created in the first place !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sharafat<br />
There are somethings in your comment which are true, but most of it is clearly &#8216;BS&#8217;. And I don&#8217;t blame you totally for it. Its how people in Pakistan are made to believe about India, and vice versa in India as well.<br />
The blame should go to the respective media of both countries who are just enjoying the game.<br />
But post 26/11, I can surely say that India has got a much needed wake up call, and hopefully past mistakes wont be repeated. I hope Pakistan too learns from whats happening on ground right now and recognizes the real enemy. India is not, was never, and never will be, an enemy to Pakistan; and its really painful and sad to know that even today, most Pakistanis think the other way.<br />
As for Gandhi, he was the one who forced the INC to agree with Jinnah&#8217;s two nation theory. Had it not been for his resolve to let Jinnah have his way, Pakistan would not have been created in the first place !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharafat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/2009/11/23/keeping-india-out-of-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharafat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/?p=513#comment-422</guid>
		<description>The trouble in  South Asia is called India. While Gandhi was preaching non-violence, his newly independent country was invading Kashmir, Heydrabad, Goa (later on), etc. India armed, financed, and directed terrorists in East Pakistan, and when that did not work it invaded Pakistan under the shadow of Soviet protection, it helped set up the Tamil Tigers and armed them and financed them for years, it has blockaded Nepal on several occasions, it picked a fight with China and got its butt kicked, it is in dispute with Bangladesh over their common borders, it swallowed Sikkim years ago, it introduced the curse of nuclear weapons to the region, its military budget is dwarfs the combined budgets of all its neighbors, its armed forces are desigend to project force and regularly hold exercises to invade Pakistan. The bottom line is that India is an aggressive and expansionist power, that is why it is present in Afghsnistan. There will be no peace in South Asia unless India is confined to its legitimate borders - not the ones it seeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trouble in  South Asia is called India. While Gandhi was preaching non-violence, his newly independent country was invading Kashmir, Heydrabad, Goa (later on), etc. India armed, financed, and directed terrorists in East Pakistan, and when that did not work it invaded Pakistan under the shadow of Soviet protection, it helped set up the Tamil Tigers and armed them and financed them for years, it has blockaded Nepal on several occasions, it picked a fight with China and got its butt kicked, it is in dispute with Bangladesh over their common borders, it swallowed Sikkim years ago, it introduced the curse of nuclear weapons to the region, its military budget is dwarfs the combined budgets of all its neighbors, its armed forces are desigend to project force and regularly hold exercises to invade Pakistan. The bottom line is that India is an aggressive and expansionist power, that is why it is present in Afghsnistan. There will be no peace in South Asia unless India is confined to its legitimate borders &#8211; not the ones it seeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bilal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/2009/11/23/keeping-india-out-of-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/?p=513#comment-421</guid>
		<description>look the only prblem to us is that india counts every terrorist attack on him as an isi act .india can even see the current situation of Pakistan but he still think that these torrorists are under ISIs influence.any future attack on india will directly push us in a war even if it would be from any frustrated muslim of india itself and with an afghanistan of indian influence who is continously thretening pakistan with anuclear war it is a nigtmare for pakistan to fight with india thats why we think that indian influence on afghanistan is dangrous for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look the only prblem to us is that india counts every terrorist attack on him as an isi act .india can even see the current situation of Pakistan but he still think that these torrorists are under ISIs influence.any future attack on india will directly push us in a war even if it would be from any frustrated muslim of india itself and with an afghanistan of indian influence who is continously thretening pakistan with anuclear war it is a nigtmare for pakistan to fight with india thats why we think that indian influence on afghanistan is dangrous for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
