Comments on: Taliban demand freedom of speech, condemn ban on attack cover

By: r. s.gupta.advocate.supremecourt.india,delhi

r. s.gupta.advocate.supremecourt.india,delhi — Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:16:15 +0000

u.sarms.should take full control of pakistan to save pak nuclear arms.radheshyam gupta,advocate.

By: Andrew White

Andrew White — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:40:30 +0000

LOL! This is a classic case of a Kettle calling it black. It just shows that they get sustainance from the news media. he lesson- Do not give prominence to these terrorists.

By: Deryl

Deryl — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:15:56 +0000

The way in which the taliban ought to be silenced is death not the law. The intent of these laws is good but produces problems down the road slippery slope style for those amongst us with not quite so evil messages as the taliban.

A less extreme comparison is of the kkk in the united states with those wishing to silence the kkk. The intent may be good but in using the law as the method to silence them you become no better than they are.

By: sammy4231

sammy4231 — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:22:39 +0000

Free Speech, Chapter 1, Lesson 1, Page 1.
Speech advocating crime, threatening crime, or showing criminal acts is not covered by free speech law.
The police can, in all cases, confiscate the speech, in whatever it’s form, to prosecute the criminals. No government advocating free speech would ever allow criminal speech into the public arena where it may inspire others to emulate the crime.

Douche bags, run your snuff flicks around yourselves, and Allah be praised if you get caught. Firing squad for all murderers.