Opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai’s decision to abandon a controversial run-off ballot against Zimbabwe’s strongman President Robert Mugabe would surprise few. Western governments and aid agencies have for weeks voiced the same accusations of violence and intimidation against the Mugabe camp which Tsvangirai cited in concluding that a run-off election stood no chance of being free or fair.
Hours before Tsvangirai’s decision, his Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) reported that its rally in the capital Harare had been broken up by pro-Mugabe youth militia, something Mugabe’s ruling ZANU-PF party denied.
Tsvangirai had appeared to be in a dominant position to win a run-off poll after defeating Mugabe in the first round — but only if the vote was going to be fair. Agreeing to participate in the run-off was indeed a gamble the opposition leader took in the face of contrary arguments by even some of his supporters who felt it was naive to expect a fair vote in a terrain dominated by Mugabe and his associates.
What happens now after Tsvangirai’s decision to pull out of the June 27 second round ballot? How will African governments and the international community react? What should they do? What options are left for Tsvangirai and his MDC? Could there still be negotiations, and if so should these still be brokered by South African President Thabo Mbeki? What does all this mean for the people of Zimbabwe? Will this reinforce Mugabe’s position in power or hasten his demise? Have your say.

Trackback
63 comments so far
Mugabe is insulting the people of Zimbabwe. he is either too senile or he has forgotten what his revolution fought for when Smith was ousted out of power. freedom of the individual and fight for poverty and equal opportunity for all.
- Posted by changalinow it seems he is the only one to enjoy that freedom and a small group of his supporters. no tolerance for those who happen to have a different point of view contrary to his.
should he be allowed to impose such dictatorship and intimidation in order to habg on to power while the ordinary man is dying of hunger and diseases
When Mugabe deployed his thugs soon after the 29 March vote it was clear he meant business. By the time SADC Heads met in Lusaka on 11 April to discuss the Zimbabwe crisis, they too knew the only thing they could do to rein Mugabe in was to take him head-on and send in SADC Police and Soldiers. Unfortunately, that was something SADC Heads were not prepared to do.
Of course Tsvangirai himself and a number of his own MDC leadership realised the situation was dangerous and the escaped into the urban centres or jumped boarder. It was very selfish for Tsvangirai to even put his name forward for the run-off when the political situation was so dangerous, particularly so the hundreds of thousands of innocent Zimbabweans, who, he knew well enough, would be caught up in this madness.
Mugabe is but a dying political animal, the country’s economy is what the cancer eating him alive. Tsvangirai took part in the run-off because he wanted Mugabe’s scalp. It was really stupid of him to do so considering the price in human lives and misery Zimbabwe has had to pay.
Now that he has withdrawn, one only hopes Mugabe will respond by calling off his thugs. After that Zimbabweans will then have to consider what to do next. Economic measures to quickly and safely end Mugabe’s dictatorship.
- Posted by Wilbert MukoriTsvangirai has made a heroic decision to safeguard the lives and properties of the suffering people of Zimbabwe. It is now up to the international community to sanction mugabe and his terrorists. God bless, Morgan.
- Posted by Mark, U.S.A.All these years that Mugabe has manipulated himself into the ultimate power position, aligning himself with God, neither the UK government nor US nor UN has done anything to have this despot brought to justice. His commanders murdered thousands of Matabeles using the infamous North Korean trained 5th Brigade. And the World stood by and accepted it. Thatcher, Blair and Brown are scorned by Mugabe + his cabal of thugs. After all what did they do?? Proverbial British Bulldogs with Rubber Teeth. Zimbabwe had the potential to be such a success. Now look at it. Mbeki is taking the whole region into the same mire through his non interference pact with Mugabe. Why? What I wonder did Bob offer Thabo out of the spoils of the Congo debacle? This aside it is truly tragic that innocent children, mothers, fathers, grandparents are starving …and those who could sort it out do nothing except mouth platitudes…………
- Posted by Concerned exrhodieIt makes no difference. Mug abe wasn’t going to leave and his supporters wouldn’t let him leave because they would be left in the cold and in danger.
So the MDC made the correct decision because it will reduce the political violence. Now we must leave the Zim people to determine the next steps. The international community should stay out unless they are sincere in a change and nobody is in this situation. This includes NGO’s etc.
- Posted by buffalojumpMugabe has lost the legitimacy that he would have claimed if he had won a supposedly democratic vote. He will be president with only the 43% from the previous vote. He can gain control of the Senate only by appointing unelected people, and can gain control of the House of Assembly only by arresting and removing MDC MPs on spurious charges. He can control local authorities only by dismissing the elected MDC councils. So he won’t even have a fictional claim to being a legitimately elected leader of a majority party.
SADC must recognize this and not recognize his government.
- Posted by RogerThe famous opposition leader must respect the republican law of his country Zimbabwe. In the name of national interest, it is right for him to accept to be a part of national government. For many african people, this man is a british puppet who forgets where is coming from….
- Posted by TendaieMore than anything, Mugabe has been confirmed as the classic African dictator; living in luxury while blaming the Western world for the results of his mismanagement and using misguided youth militias to control his people. To quote V, “People should not be afraid of their government, government should be afraid of their people.”
- Posted by Ben FoxThe ideas of democracy and human rights are dead in Zimbabwe and it is time for other African nations such as South Africa to wake up and do something about it.
just aquick comment/fact
- Posted by ofheroesinwarDo you know that as Zimbabweans we’ve become so scared that we wont even participate on these blogs because they REQUIRE our email adds. Thats how paranoid we’ve become as a result of fear cultivated in us.
It is important to mention that the election does not mean democracy. As Free Thinker, I ask myself this informational question: ” Election in Zimbabwe for what ? What this ” Britishmade “, self called opposition leader, will do for the people of Zimbabwe? Nothing, this it is the right answer. Certainly, he will bring chaos, because he is not free from his master…. In general, African countries are thirsty for the real leaders. For this reason, but they do not need another puppet of this kind..
- Posted by ThiongTsvangirai should be applauded for his heroic actions. Sadly, I doubt there will be any change in Zimbabwe because of this. Mugabe will remain in power, and the people will continue to suffer as a result.
Shame on Mbeki for being a COWARD and for refusing to stand up to Mugabe. Shame on the U.N. and International Community for once again allowing something like this to happen again in Africa.
And to the poster called “Thiong” - it is clear that you, too, are a puppet of Mugabe, just as you call Tsvangirai a puppet if Britain. Go back to kneeling before your master - there is no reason for you to post here.
- Posted by Bardas SudislavThanks to Morgan for not plungimg his country into further chaos as happened in Kenya where opposition leader called for mass action resulting in thousands dead after he lost the election. If only he can release himself of british bondage, he is the man i support, till then i’d someone else free of british manipulation.
- Posted by ochilo chilbinThis is a victory of zimbabwe people because the British Puppet was finally kicked out of the election. Congratulations to zimbabwe!
- Posted by MichaelVery interesting perspective Thiong. Mug (abe) is now inviting the new imperialists to Zimbabwe who will not be concerned about the social and economic well being of the less fortunate.
One colonial nations rule is gone and a new one is now exploiting the resources for whose benefit? NOT the average person and less fortunate living in Zimbabwe. Do you not care for the starving and those in need? Try living under the conditions of the non influential in Zimbabwe.
Whose puppet are you?
- Posted by buffalojumpThe decision by Morgan Tsvangirayi to withdraw from the presidential run-off not only cements Mugabe’s grip on power but, also deepens the plight to freedom and progress for already suffering and subjugated Zimbabweans. Indeed, the reasons given by Tsvangirayi for the withdrawal are valid when looking at the situation on the ground in Zimbabwe, but, withdrawal was not supposed to be a resort as this legitimises the ascendency of a defeated Robert Mugabe. Having Mugabe reclaim the leadership of the country unopposed only goes to strengthen the beleaguered dictator. Tsvangirayi should have participated in the run-off to maintain the pressure on Mugabe and to keep the fire and spirit of disposing Mugabe alive and burning. The announcement by Tsvangirayi to withdraw from the race in a sucker punch to our aspirations as Zimbabweans for a better day tomorrow.
- Posted by Shamba ShambamutoIt matters not what Mugabe, Chinamassa, Mutonga or even our friend Thiong say. The days of the once mighty Zanu PF are numbered. They have sacrificed the principles of the liberation struggle with their own political greed and corruption. With all its faults the MDC have done the right thing and they are the legitimate choice of the Zimbabwe people. One day soon the heroes of this struggle against opression will lie in heroes acre and the MDC President shall walk in state house. There is nothing Mugabe or the generals can do about it. The time is comming, the pain will be great but CHANGE is as inevitable as the sun rising over the Nyanga mountains!
- Posted by TashingaWhat I find extraordinary in all this is the supine attitude of the UN and Africa. The deadly hostility some people in South Africa have exhibited towards Zambabwian immigrants make a mockery of the public stance of their leader. And as for the UN, who was it who referred to the tyranny of the third world? The UN seems impotent when it comes to taking any kind of effective action against African tyrants, Middle Eastern oligarths or Islamist terrorists. At a time when the balance is shifting Eastwards, why do ever more impoverished Western nations always act as the policemen of the world? Isn’t it time the Saudis and petro-rich Arabs started taking some greater responsibility for helping out?
- Posted by MargaritaTendaie..you fool , you are being paid nothing to beat MDC pple and steal food from them cause you hungry.MDC did a right move, the bastards would turn against each other one day,,,,when they have no one to attack ..
- Posted by NoeThis is a great victory for Zimbabwe over attempts by racist colonial masters and white farmers to retake control of the country.
This is a great defeat for those white farmers who are seeking a return to the past.
This is a crushing defeat for the shameless Western propaganda outlets like the BBC and Reuters: their colossal efforts have failed.
The British-American strategy of starving the people of Zimbabwe through cruel economic sanctions (google ZIDERA) and the hope that they will elect the puppet of Britain and white farmers (Tsvangirai) has failed woefully.
Leave the people of Zimbabwe to form a unity/transition government and revive their country.
Those white farmers who want to live like any other Zimbabwean should stay and help re-unite and develop the country. Those who want a return to the Ian Smith apartheid regime should go back to Britain and create such a regime. Apartheid is over.
- Posted by VincentVincent do you not realise that this is a great victory for the MDC? Mugabe has given the election and the moral high ground to the MDC. The old man and his foolish cronies like Munangagwa have now fully internationalised the plight of Zimbabweans. Now the corrupt and decayed ZANU PF government will not be recognised it will be just like Rhodesia - alone - and the traitor Mugabe and his running dogs will face justice. For those of Zanu PF that seek forgiveness we will offer the hand of reconcilliation. For the others they must now seek exile. Perhaps in China? Pamberi ne MDC! Pamberi ne President Morgan Tsvangirai! Pasi Zanu PF! Pasi Bob! Maitiro Chinja!
- Posted by TashingaPS. Vincent we will let you stay but you will have to give your stolen farm to someone who knows how to farm and not just talk!
right decision, nows also the time for nelson mandela to end his resounding silence and critise mugabe and his cronies!
- Posted by r.downPresident Tembo Mbeki’s idea of Government of National Unity (GNU) is laughable. Mugabe has ruined the country and all he cares about now is that he and his cronies should be allowed to enjoy their loot. He has just plunged the whole country into an orgy of lawlessness and murder just to maintain the status quo. GNU is simply to appease him. For 30 years Ziimbabweans have done nothing but appease him and he has done nothing but behave like a spoilt brat! We now demand and rightly deserve better!
Best way forward for Zimbabwe now is to have a UN Supervised Interim Gvt tasked to: 1) produce a new constitution 2) provide immediate economic help and relief 3) investigate past human rights violations 4) supervise fresh elections
The Interim Gvt will have Zimbabweans from all sectors of Zimbabwean society and will last six months (cooling off period for all political players).
The UN must act quickly, decisively and firmly, especially with Mugabe and those still seeking to appease him.
- Posted by Wilbert MukoriZimbabwe does not need “economic help” because we know imperialist powers always include imperislist political conditions in “economic help/aid.”
What Zimbabwe needs is to Britain and America to lift the cruel economic sanctions (including the US economic sanctions introduced by ZIDERA in 2001) and let the people of Zimbabwe revide their economy.
Mugabe may have “mismanaged” the economy, but the real cause of 100,000% inflation is economic sactions (declared and undeclared).
The British pretend to care for democracy in Zimbabwe, but they do not mind starving millions of poor blacks with sanctions for the benefit of a few thiousand white farmers.
They claim that the situation in Zimbabwe is catastrophic, yet they keep deporting black Zimbabwean asylum seekers (what hypocrisy!)
They claim to want democracy in Zimbabwe, yet they prop up vile dictators in Uganda, Ethiopia, Equatirial Guinea, Egypt, etc.
The people of Zimbabwe must say “No” to re-colonization.
Tsvangirai needs to come to his senses and sit down with Mugabe and Mbeki to find a way to defend the interests of his country (and not those of white farmers and Britain).
Tsvangirai needs to assure Mugabe and ZANU that he intends to serve the interst of Zimbabwe and not those of his current masters. In that way, he can participate in a transition government that will reform the country’s institutions and allow Mugabe to step down.
- Posted by VincentMugabe is just a puppet himself - if his generals say jump, he jumps. He is probably too much of coward to concede defeat, for fear of what his own generals will do to him. Isn’t it about time people realize this?
Mbeki’s role in all of this is also very questionable.
Politicians don’t care about the people, only about themselves.
Where can Mugabe and his henchmen go to: that’s why they will stay, until the Zimbabweans decide to fight. And it’s something they will have to do themselves. The white West can’t help them - it will be seen as colonial interference. And Black Africa does not have enough of a spine to help them.
Ergo, nothing changes.
- Posted by RonCde Vincent! President Tsvangirai does not need to assure you, Mugabe or anyone from ZANU PF of his intentions. You see he was elected by a vast majority in the first round and he will be elected by a vast majority when the election is eventually held. Even now we have the MINORITY - ZANU PF party in parliament. Saka Cde Vincent you see the people of Zimbabwe are finished with your failed neo-socialist ideology! It does not feed people and build countries. Sanctions - ahhh! Where were you in the 60’s and 70’s comrade? What Zimbabwe needs is people who can grow food and run businesses not empty ideology that one might read in failed publications like the New African.
Cde Vincent the one thing you can be assured of is that the change she is coming and I don’t think you will like it.
- Posted by TashingaMr. Tashinga,
Why are you addressing your posts to me? Why do you assume that I am a ZANU member?
I am not a member of ZANU or MDC. I am just stating the facts as I see it and expressing my opinion.
Please make your points as you see things without addressing them to me. I am not here to debate anyone, just expressing my point of view.
My point of view is that Zimbabweans (MDC and ZANU) should be left alone to determine what is best for their country: no interference from Britain and the USA, no self-serving propaganda from the British media, and the devastating economic sanctions should be lifted.
In my opinion, nothing will be resolved in Zimbabwe as long as the MDC is seen to be serving the interests of white farmers and Britain. Even if this is not so, Tsvangirai has to make a clear break from these imperialist/colonial powers.
Tsvangirai needs to tell Gordon Brown, Condi Rice, and Jendayi Fraser to shut up and let him solve his country\’s problems with his fellow Zimbabweans. Otherwise, even if he wins an eventual election, the country will remain divided.
The only way forward is for the sanctions to be lifted, for Britain/USA to stop interfering, for the white farmers to accept that the apartheid era is over, and for the people of Zim to come together for a transition government/government of national unity.
Tsvangirai indicated on June 23 that he is willing to negotiate with ZANU if the violence stops: that is the way forward…
- Posted by VincentZimbabweans,
It is high time you woke up and fought for your rights, because East or West, home is best. Mugabe has confirmed that he is willing to ride rughshod over the will of the people of Zimbabwe. You have fought the war of liberation before to oust Ian Smith, it is time to fight another war to oust another dictator. We have a saying in East Africa that ‘Peace cannot be attained except by the tip of a sword’. A time comes when a man has to stand up to a bully not for the sake of his life, but that of his children. The more Zimbabweans flee to neighbouring countries, the more Mugabe is emboldened.
It is a pathetic shame to see once proud Zimbas reduced to menial jobs, crime and immoral activities in South Africa, Botswana and Zambia just to fend for themselves and their families.
In Kenya, someone stole the election but the people stood up against this treachery. Yes Kenyans lost their lives but the blood that flowed has sowed seeds of a brighter future, and though we have a coalition government, lessons have been learnt, nothing comes easy.
It is about time that we decolonised our minds, the age of blaming every evil on the colonialists is long gone. Once a liberation hero becomes despotic, they bring out the tired imperialist song.
Self criticism can only be producrive not retrogressive. Asia had its fair of colonialization but they haven’t spent their post-independence days looking back, instead they have focused on the future so why not Africa?
All said, kudos to Tsvangirai for refusing to legitimize an illegal process. The sun will rise again over Zim when Mugabe and his cohoots are long gone.
- Posted by JamhuriBrother Tsvangirai has walked a very tight rope between the cynicism of an election so inordinately tilted in facour of state power and incumbency and the loftiness change by the people in a free ballot.Band in this masterstroke,the MDC
- Posted by murumbuchiA masterstroke.The MDC has allowed Zanupf,Comrade Mugabe and the rest to show their hands,cudgels and indifference respectively.Let June 27 come and let President Mugabe be reelected:time is up and it is such a tragedy that 28 years after,Robert Gabriel Mugabe is still contesting elections..
- Posted by murumbuchiPeople blame US/EU sanctions that led to Zimbabwe’s collapse! Japan was bombed, almost wiped off the earth and yet, they rebuilt and are now a POWERHOUSE! Zimbabwe needs a SMART leader - giving land away to those who don’t have the skills or brains on how to harvest it was the first leap into Zimbabwe’s economic decline! The sanctions are against Mugabe and ZANU PF, includes travel ban, assets frozen, etc. ADVICE: Have the new owners buy a book on how to harvest land for food! Another word of advice: Have the “FIRST SHOPPER”, Grace have a yard-sale that includes her selling her expensive shoes and give the money to the millions of starving people in Zimbabwe. JMO
- Posted by AngelaVincent, you are being re-colonized by the chinese. Wake up.Skin colour doesn’t matter.
As Jamhuri says, the Asian countries who were also colonialized aren’t blaming others for past generations but are moving ahead. Also remember we in NA were also colonies and moved away from the ‘poor me’ mentality to moving ahead. A grievance and blame mentality achieves nothing.
You obviously have an opportunity to move ahead and truly help the masses living in Zimbabwe and create a situation where the millions who left feel there are now opportunities at home. If not, I assume you are one of the rich Zimbabweans under the protection of the President and the President’s men or you are from one of their families supported abroad.
- Posted by buffalojumpThe US/EU sanctions against Zimbabwe are not just against Mugabe and ZANU PF. They are not just travel ban, frozen assets… That is the propaganda prppagated by the British media.
The sanctions against Zimbabwe are real ECONOMIC SANCTIONS.
WESTERN ECONOMIC SANTIONS AGAINST ZIMBABWE.
1. IMF and the World Bank suspended balance of payments to Zimbabwe in 2001, and still stand today.
2. On December 21, 2001, US President George W. Bush signed into law S. 494, the “Zimbabwe democracy bill” (ZIDERA). The he law, among other things, instructed American officials in the IMF and multilateral development banks - including the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Development Association, the International Finance Corporation, the Inter-American Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the Inter-American Investment Corporation, the African Development Bank, the African Development Fund, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Multilateral Investment Guaranty Agency -to “oppose and vote against any extension by the respective institution of any loan, credit, or guarantee to the government of Zimbabwe,” and to vote against any reduction or cancellation of “indebtedness owed by the government of Zimbabwe.
The above are virtually all the banks IN THE WORLD which could potentially lend money to Zimbabwe. This effectively means that Zimbabwe is one of the very few countries in the world that currently exists without any balance of payments support and external lines of credit.
3. In addition, the above-mentioned Zimbabwe Democracy Bill vetoes debt relief to Zimbabwe. This blocks investment in capital and social development, thus forcing it to spend its already depleted foreign reserves on servicing debt.
4. On February 18, 2002, the European Union’s foreign to imposed sanctions against Zimbabwe. Under terms of the sanctions, the European Union suspended budgetary support to Zimbabwe and terminated financial support for all projects.
5. On January 14, 2002, Britain threatened to withhold $18 million in budgetary support from Malawi, the chair of the SADC, unless it agreed to direct the SADC towards the imposition of sanctions against Zimbabwe. Similar threats to withdraw budgetary support were wielded against Mozambique. At the summit, President Benjamin Mkapa of Tanzania announced that British Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Baroness Amos telephoned him directly and urged him not to support Zimbabwe at the SADC and at the upcoming meeting of the Commonwealth. When that call failed, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw then telephoned and attempted to bully him. President Mkapa of Tanzania revealed that members of the Commonwealth had endured a “bombardment of an alliance against Mugabe”
—————-
These are not just travel bans on Mugabe, these are economic sanctions on poor black Zimbabweans by the bacers of white farmers. These are the reasons for the 100,000%
Congo has been at war for 20 years, it does not have 1,000% inflation; Somalia has had no goverment for 15 years, it does not have 500% inflation. So why does a country that is not at war have 100,000% inflation? The answer is simple: economic sanctions.
- Posted by Vincent.
This is not a reply to the person who does not want to debate with anyone whoes name is not Vincent! It is a response however to poorley the informed naive person/s who have no idea why Zimbabwe has inflation of 2 000 000% not 100 000%. The answer is simple for those that need it made simple. Robert Gabriel Mugabe and the Zanu PF kleptocrats. Zimbabwe is worse off than Somalia DRC because of the traitor Mugabe and no other reason - he prints money so fast to pay his thugs to kill and maime innocent Zimbabweans of all shades. If it were otherwise he would get support from non western and african brother countries. So where I wonder if the economic fundamentals are so good are the great supporters from the “look east” - (more like let my Mai Grace shop east)-policy? Where is that great band of African brothers…they are not there because everyone knows that Mugabe and Zanu PF are liars and thieves(imbava).
I do feel sorry for those poor misguided brothers that are mentally trapped in their own xenophobia about the West. But in my home village they would rather live in peace and with a full stomach and heathly children in a country that has strong ties with the West than in the misery they have now under Mugabe. Blair , Bush and Brown are far greater friends of africa than that despicable disgrace called Mugabe. When we fought the struggle the first goal was political freedom the right to be free in Zimbabwe the land was second and even then we wanted it to be productive. Mugabe has stolen both - our freedom and our land. But he will be gone soon and we will welcome the West and thank them for their support when the misguided ones told us to feed our children ideology.
- Posted by TashingaI agree the sanctions trickle down to the poor masses, because for them to get credit from other countries it would be at a huge % rate. I don’t think lifting the sanctions would matter anyway - Mugabe would make sure all money given to the country would go directly in HIS and the ZANU PF pockets before giving the Zimbabwean people 1 cent! Just as he does now.
- Posted by AngelaVINCENT>>>>>>>>>Poor fellow Zimbabwean is Mugabe is not dependant on the West why cry for The West money, print as many Zim dollars as you want,,,,
- Posted by NoeHow Western sanctions are making the Zimbabwean economy ’scream’:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa 5391/is_200705/ai_n21288057
———————————-
The USA and Britain should lift the cruel, immoral economic sanctions on Zimbabwe and let the people reconcile to solve their own problems.
People are starving and dying. How many black people must starve just because land was taken from a few white farmers and returned to the rightful owners?
500,000 children were starved to death after the first Iraq war, 1 million have died in Iraq in the second war, how many will die in Zimbabwe under the burden of 100,000% inflation simply because the greed of Western governments and the revenge of former colonial masters?.
- Posted by Vincent.Vicent i hope u will understand that by 2001 when Mugabe took over the land the majority of Zimboz had emigrated and they was so much underdevelopment around the country. We Zimboz are very patient but for now our patience have run dry.We have suffered enough under the Zim tough laws and oppression.Mugabe was never a legitimate leader to start with, he stole the votes from Nkomo and killed the majority of Matebeles.The world watched with silence by then and now what we rather die of hunger that watch him kill us like flies.
- Posted by NoeNoe,
Whatever Mugabe’s alleged crimes may be, they do not negate the fact that cruel economic sanctions by Britain and its allies are strangling the Zimbabwean economy.
They do not negate the fact that Britain and its allies are seeking regime change in Zimbabwe not because they love Zimbabweans but for their own greedy ends.
Is Mugabe or Tsvangirai suffering as a result of this economic strangulation? No. It is the ordinary (mostly black) people of Zimbabwe who are suffering.
When these crimes were allegedly being committed, the Queen of England was busy awarding a knighthood to Mugabe, British universities were lining up to award him honorary degrees while condemning Mandela as a terrorist who should rot in jail.
Why have they changed now? Because their economic interests are now at stake. That is why.
My point is that Western economic sanctions are starving the Zim people and they should be lifted.
- Posted by VincentZimbabwe Under Siege
http://www.swans.com/library/art9/ankoma h5.html
- Posted by VincentVincent
You are one of those single track minded person who, once set on a given path, will not see anything else.
Let me just say three things to you:
- Posted by Wilbert Mukori1) Can you ever accept the possibility that Mugabe mismanaged the Zimbabwe economy? The WB, IMF and other Western institution refused to extend an loans, etc. to the Zimbabwe gvt because the latter a) could not replay what it owed them already b) would not accept to restructure and stop the endless waste. The WB etc would be totally irresponsible to throw more good money after bad.
2) Mugabe was free to borrow money from anyone else other than the US, British or Western Institutions; there are no UN sanctions against Zimbabwe. Why did his friends in China or north Africa give him money? The truth is they did but even they grew tired of seeing him.
3) What Mugabe is doing in Zimbabwe at present is denying the ordinary Zimbabweans the basic right to have a meaningful say in the governance of their country. He has been doing this ever since he came into office. Simpletons like you consider him a hero for his stand against the West but surely, surely you do not expect those at the coal face of his dictatorial rule to ignore all the suffering and despair they face and join you in the praise of Mugabe!
Mukori,
Yes, I accept the possibility that Mugabe may have mismanaged the economy. However, no amount of economic mismanagement has EVER resulted in this type of economic collapse and 2 million % inflation. Any economist will tell you that this is not possible in a country that is not at war.
Congo has been at war for 20 years, it does not have 1,000% inflation. Somalia has been without a government or economy for 15 years, it does not have such a problem.
It is impossible without outside actions, and that is what ZIDERA and the other sanctions have done.
How can you say that blocking a country’s access to all international lending and financial institutions does not amount to economic sanctions? You say Mugabe should borrow money from China and North America, but even those countries cannot function without international financial institutions.
Regarding the IMF, Zimbabwe owed $87 million when loans to it were cut off. There are many African countries that owe BILLIONS of dollars but the IMF does not cut them off. Argentina simply refused to pay its debts to the IMF, but it was not cut off.
ZIDERA clearly states the reason for these sanctions: the USA wants “democracy” in Zimbabwe and wants Zimbabwe to withdraw its troops from Congo. There is nowhere in ZIDERA that mentions economic mismanagement as the reason for the sanctions.
YOU SAID: Mugabe was free to borrow money from anyone else other than the US, British or Western Institutions; there are no UN sanctions against Zimbabwe.
These institutions are not US, British or Western Institutions. They are INTERNATIONAL financial institutions. The USA and Britain simply happen to have veto power in these institutions because these countries effectively control the world economic system and the UN. Some of the international banks listed in ZIDERA are African and Asian development banks. UN development institutions like the UNDP are also blocked from doing development business in Zimbabwee.
Are you suggesting that China and poor North African countries have the capacity to replace international financial institutions re-Zimbabwe? International institutions are there not only to lend money, they are the avenue for international trade.
You may dislike or hate Mugabe, but it is ridiculous to deny the facts regarding economic sanctions, even when they are clearly laid out for you.
If you dislike Mugabe, that does not mean you should deny the fact that the people suffering as a result of these snctions are ordinary people — not Mugabe, not Tsvangirai, not white farmers.
The people’s economic hardship is mainly due to economic sanctions. Mugabe may have mismanaged the economy, but no amount of mismanagement can cause such catastrophic suffering because countries with nobody to manage or mismanage their economies cannot spiral to that level of economic collapse without outside forces strangling them.
- Posted by Vincent.
Mr. Vincent - you can’t have it both ways. “EVIL WEST RACIST COLONIAL MASTERS LEAVE US ALONE WE DON’T NEED YOU” and in the same breath “EVIL WEST RACIST COLONIAL MASTERS LIFT YOUR ECONOMIC SANCTIONS OFF US TO HELP US OUT” Either you need the West or you don’t? I truly do not believe the West wants Zimbabwe to back to the rule of Ian Smith. That is the proproganda that Mugabe and Zanu spew to instill fear in Zimbabweans. Just as the West was fooled by thinking Iraq had weapons of mass destruction…the gov’t preyed upon the publics fears.
- Posted by AngelaANGELA WROTE: Mr. Vincent - you can’t have it both ways. “EVIL WEST RACIST COLONIAL MASTERS LEAVE US ALONE WE DON’T NEED YOU” and in the same breath “EVIL WEST RACIST COLONIAL MASTERS LIFT YOUR ECONOMIC SANCTIONS OFF US TO HELP US OUT”
=
I am not saying the West is evil. The sactions are evil. Nobody has the right to impose sanctions on anyone. Lifting the sanctions is not “help.” Zimbabwe has the right to use international multilateral financial institutions just like any other country.
These Western countries are abusing their power by imposing these sanctions. Imagine someone bullying your child in school simply because he is stronger. If you are ask the bully to stop bullying your child, it does not mean you are asking the bully to “help” your child. He has no right to bully him in the first place.
The sactions are evil. They have destroyed the lives of millions of black and some white families, turned millons into refugees, and forced millions to scavenge in neighboring countries. Those who managed to escape to Britain have been deported back to Zimbabwe.
The sanctions do not affect Mugabe or Tsvangirai. The sanctions amount to collective punishment aimed forcing the people to vote one way.
YOU SAID: Either you need the West or you don’t?
It should be up to the people of Zimbabwe to decide what type of relations they want to have with the West. As things are now, the West is trying to impose its will on the people of Zimbabwe.
YOU SAID: I truly do not believe the West wants Zimbabwe to back to the rule of Ian Smith. That is the proproganda that Mugabe and Zanu spew to instill fear in Zimbabweans. Just as the West was fooled by thinking Iraq had weapons of mass destruction…the gov’t preyed upon the publics fears.
The West does not want a return to the Ian Smith years. It is simply imposible. What the West wants is to control the economy and for white farmers to get their farms back.
- Posted by VincentVincent
The Zimbabwe gvt has been printing paper money like crazy, that is the regime’s only economic answer to the crisis. That is alone can drive inflation through the roof. You do not need an economist to tell you that!
The issue on the table is Mugabe’s failure to hold free and fair elections and not only that but has gone further and send his thugs into an orgy of human rights abuses. Of course you can not see that because you are who you are - a single-track minded individual!
Angela and everyone
There is an important and urgent debate on what is the way forward now for Zimbabwe. I think we will have failed ourselves and the suffering people of Zimbabwe if we let ourselves be side tracked by the likes of Vincent!
- Posted by Wilbert MukoriYou can’t get something for nothing! Zimbabwe can’t take without giving something in return, thats what every institution is about GIVE AND TAKE. No free hand-outs!
- Posted by AngelaSo what will Zimbabwe do for countries if sanctions are lifted? At this point in the game Mugabe and his regime have shown the WORLD it’s too late to work with him, he would never be trusted in business and/or world affairs. In this instance, you have to throw the baby out with the bathwater and start from scratch.
Mukori,
You are typical of all the white farmers/MDC supporters I have debated on various websites: you resort to personal name-calling attacks when you have no point to male or when your point has been effectively countered.
I am not saying that Mugabe has not contributed to this crisis. Of course he has, because he is the one in power in the country.
My argument is that 2 million % inflation is not just the result if “mismanagement” or printing of money. Printing money in itself is the result of an economic crisis: the need to make up for a shortage of liquidity. Have you ever seen any government that starts printing money just for the fun of it?
I am saying that Western economic sanctions and strangulation of the Zimbabwean economy has contributed immensely. I have provided the legislation that imposed these sanctions in 2001, I have named the banks and international financial institutions involved, I have explained how this was accomplished. Yet you remain in denial and resort to name-calling and calling on other to ignore me because your false claims have been shown for what they are.
As I said, the only way forward is reconciliation in the country. Even if Tsvangirai somehow manages to become president, he will have to deal with ZANU cadre because they control all state institutions, including the police and the military.
A president Tsvangirai will also have to deal with the legitimate demands of real and fake war veterans and the land issue.
The British/American strategy does not address this because all they are interested in regime change without considering the consequences (the same way they effected regime change in Iraq without considering the consequences).
The way forward is a unity/transition government similar to the one in Kenya and a lifting of the Western economic sanctions that you deny. This will prevent violence between the two sides, give the long-sufferinf people some relief from the effects of the economic sanctions (mismanagement, as you prefer to see it), and allow time for reform of government institutions.
- Posted by VincentA unified government in Zimbabwe will never work. Zanu and the MDC will fight every decision the other tries to make out of pure hatred for one another. The only way for Zimbabwe out of it’s mess is a CHANGE of GOVERMENT/POWER (if you want to call what they have now a real government). The current Zimbabwe government does not and will never have again any SOCIAL CREDIBILITY! Of course it will have help from other dictators but that’s about it. Zanu and Mugabe’s days are numbered, may not happen tomorrow, next week, next month…but it’s coming.
- Posted by AngelaMugabe is a man who belives in winning and no run off means he cant archieve this goal thus he insists the polls should go on………….
One thing for sure is that Mugabe is going one way or another dead or alive
- Posted by The Beginning of the endCan somebody tell us how international criminal court works, because i would want to see Mugabe being arrested.
- Posted by josephIn shona culture we have a proverb that says “ganda rionopetwa richinyoro” - A hide(skin) is best folded while it is still soft (wet). For any one from rural Zimbabwe you will instantly understand this proverb and how it is impossible to fold a dry hide. The relevence of this for those that see the West as the Bogey in Zimbabwe is this: Mugabe and his ZANU PF running dogs have ignored common sense they have let the hide (Zimbabwe) dry out and are now trying to fold it - but it is too late! They know that they need to make the hide wet again but cry they have no water because they would have to turn on the tap(deal with the West)and accept a truly free election in order to open the tap. So they wail, beat their chests try to get others to turn the tap on for them. They fail! In frustration they turn on the hide, they beat it - try to force it to fold but it refuses to cooperate! In frustration they blame the sun and wind for drying out the hide - anyone but themselves, they refuse to accept their own folly refuse to accept that if they remain the hide will dry out and turn to dust and they will also go with the hide into dust.
- Posted by TashingaVincent:
Your rhetoric sounded so familiar to me. Then it finally came to me. They are almost exactly the same as I heard from the Afrikaner pro-apartheid groups.
I hope that this also means that the ZANU government is facing the same plight as befell the Apartheid government.
We called them rockspiders, because they refused to came from under the rock, to really see the world.
Vincent, come out from under that rock, Look! See!
- Posted by RonVincent
I am replying because you have twisted what I said to suit your one track minded position. You are a single-track-minded person and you can call that name calling, I am only stating a fact.
If a bank refuses you credit because you do not meet their requirements, would you call it sanctions? Of course not, so why are you doing so here? I agree there are countries whose debt repayment record as bad as that of Zimbabwe and yet they have continued to borrow from WB, etc. There are many reasons for that but here I will give two: 1) the countries’ leaders have not been spending as frivolously as you-know-who 2) the leaders have not been shooting their big mouth and biting the hand that feed them as you-know-who has been doing.
Ian Smith had far reaching UN approved economic sanctions and I bet Rhodesia’s inflation rate never reached 30% at worst. You-know-who had targeted sanctions, aimed at 500 or so individuals out of 11 million, imposed by less than 25% of countries in the world and Zimbabwe’s inflation has soared to 165 000%. Well only a single-track-minded person would attribute that to the targeted sanctions, I say it is mismanagement and corruption.
Tsvangirai or whoever becomes President of Zimbabwe, after you .. is booted out, will have the wellbeing of ALL Zimbabweans to worry about given the sorry state of the Zimbabwe economic, the political chaos, etc. All caused by you- …, of course!
What “legitimate demands” of Police, war veterans, etc are you on about? They will all have to face the same hardships as everybody else. Of course there will be a full and through investigation into the serious human rights abuses of the dictatorship. If anyone in found guilty, and it is widely believed the Police, war veterans, etc were actively involved, then they will be treated like the criminals they are!
As for the land; the seized white owned farms were redistributed to landless peasants- a peasant owning a whole hundred acre plus farm?! All fraudulently acquired farm(s) must be taken away. The key to Zimbabwe’s economic recovery is getting the country’s agricultural production back to its bread-basket-of-the-region level as soon as possible. If the new regime was to allow the very people whose greed was the root cause of Zimbabwe’s problem keep their loot then it would be a serious betrayal of the people.
The campaign of intimidation and murder that has swept Zimbabwe was not just to keep you… in power; it was about fighting for and to keep one’s position on the feeding trough, about defending the amassed loot and about maintaining the shroud of secrecy hiding the dictatorship’s abuses and excesses.
Everything comes to an end and, thank God, the days of you … are numbered. All those who have had it so good till now will now face the economic reality of queuing for a few litres of petrol, of weeks on end without water, etc. You… and his senior cronies will certainly face criminal charges. Who is having nightmares now!
- Posted by Wilbert MukoriMR. MUKORI,
Stop being in denial. There are sanctions on Zimbabwe.
If I am single-track-minded, you are even worse because you keep repeating the same lies over and over, even when confronted with the facts.
Obviously, you refuse to recognize the sanctions because you are not one of the millions who are unable to make ends meet because of the sanctions. Your cheeks are obviously as rosy as those of Mugabe, Tsvangirai, ZANU, and MDC members because Mugabe and ZANU have control of the economy while you and Tsvangirai paid handsomely from your puppet-masters in London and Washington. So, you do not appreciate the existence of economic sanctions.
YOU SAID: **If a bank refuses you credit because you do not meet their requirements, would you call it sanctions? Of course not, so why are you doing so here?**
Well, the situation in Zimbabwe is different. What we have is like a powerful mafia that forces ALL BANKS to refuse loans to you and asks them to recall their loans ahead of schedule. As I said, even African and Asian banks plus international financial institutions (of which Zimbabwe is a member are prevented from lending to Zimbabwe).
That is what economic sanctions are about. It is about taking economic actions to undermine your economy.
You refuse to get this into your head: US congressmen specifically said in ZIDERA that they blocked Zimbabwe’s access to international financial institutions “until the president of the USA is satisfied that democratic reforms have been implemented.” The congressmen did not say they did it because Zimbabwe owes debts. That is a product of your imagination.
YOU SAID: **I agree there are countries whose debt repayment record as bad as that of Zimbabwe and yet they have continued to borrow from WB, etc. There are many reasons for that but here I will give two: 1) the countries’ leaders have not been spending as frivolously as you-know-who 2) the leaders have not been shooting their big mouth and biting the hand that feed them as you-know-who has been doing.**
Your denials are unconvincing. Zimbabwe owed about $87 million, some owe BILLIONS and you say they are not spending frivolously? So, millions of Zimbabweans deserve to have their livelihoods destroyed by a deliberate squeeze simply because one man “spent frivolously?” I bet if you were one of those suffering millions, you would be signing a different tune.
Your argument gets even more ridiculous. So some powerful countries have the right to undermine a country’s economy because Mugabe was “shooting their big mouth and biting the hand that feed them…” Just like these same countries have murdered 1 million in Iraq because Saddam Hussein was “shooting his big mouth?” Who is suffering here? Mugabe or millions of black Africans?
Again, there is no hand feeding anyone. These are INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS and not British or American banks, so nobody was feeding anyone.
Let me explain to you once again: imagine if you earn your living as a market trader and some local mafia blocks you from entering the market to buy and sell simply because you were “shooting your big mouth” at him, thus preventing you from feeding your family… That is the type of ridiculous argument you are making.
There are no justifications from blocking a country’s access to the international financial markets and institutions. They do not belong to Britain or the USA, they just happen to be powerful countries.
- Posted by VincentWell “someone” has just said:
“There are no justifications from blocking a country’s access to the international financial markets and institutions. They do not belong to Britain or the USA, they just happen to be powerful countries.”
Well actually there are justifications and here are but a few that relate to our beloved Zimbabwe:
International intervention is justified when a ruling political party abuses its own citizens by:
1. Denying people the right to freedom of assembly.
2. Denying people the right to print or broadcast their political perspectives.
3. To vote for the candidate of their choice without fear or intimidation or threat of war.
4. To spend public money without transparency or public accountability.
5. To subvert public institutions including the institutions of public safety and security for the sole purpose of maintianing political and ideological control by one party.
6. To repeadedly deny people due process of law under an independent judiciary.
7. To ignore the rule of law unless it serves to maintain the political advantage of the ruling party.
8. To deny the most vulnerable members of society equal access to basic services and food regardless of their political affiliation.
9. To beat, torture, maime and kill innocent civilians.
10. To rig elections that don’t go your way.
In such circumstances it is justifiable for political parties and citizens to seek the support of international institutions and countries that will support their cause in achieving basic human rights and freedoms even if that means “regime change”.
The people of Zimbabwe have voted for regime change and they have been denied this. The current ruling elite have been given ample oportunity in the last eight years for “resolving” the crisis. So like the Smith regime before them each time their options get worse but they are only delaying the inevitable. Zvakana.
- Posted by TashingaTashinga,
But the question is this: who is suffering as a result of these sanctions?
My problem with the sanctions is not whether Mugabe is good or bad. My problem with them is that the people suffering as a result are not Mugabe or Tsvangirai or the wealthy white farmers. The people suffering are millions of poor, ordinary Zimbabweans (black and white).
People cannot feed their families, but Mugabe and Tsvangirai are doing very weel, than you.
Another problem I have is that the USA and Britain are doing this not because they love democracy so much but because they are trying to protect their own strategic interests (while they are creaming about Zimbabwe, they were the first to recognize the stolen elections in Kenya, they are backing worse dictators in Ethiopia, Uganda, and Equatirial Guinea).
What we have here is that millions of poor Zimbabweans are meerely pawns in a game involving Mugabe, Tsvangirai, Britain, the USA, and wealthy white farmers.
That is very sad.
- Posted by VincentTo all my fellow Zimbabweans and all those who have stood by us; if there was a time for us to seriously think what we want in Zimbabwe, that time is now. Can I appeal to those responsible for this blog to help in this by setting up a specific blog topic: “WHAT DO ORDINARY ZIMBABWEANS WANT AND DESERVE NOW?” or something similar.
- Posted by Wilbert MukoriI give up !!!!
Long live the King - Mug abe, long live Vincent the queen.
Suffer the children of Zimbabwe.
- Posted by buffalojumpBuffalojump
Long live Buffalojump, the white farmer
- Posted by VincentBut Vincent have u seen how Mugabe reacts in Public now,,,shame he has lost dignity. I think Tsv gave him a fatal blow…
- Posted by NoeNoe,
I don’t care about Mugabe or Tsvangirai.
All I want is for the cruel economic sanctions to be lifted, for Britain to fulfill its obligations regarding land redistribution (instead of attempting to starve the people into maintaining the colonial status quo), and for Zimbabweans to be allowed to determine their own fate.
Mugabe will die soon (he is 84) and Tsvangirai will not live forever, but the land issue must be resolved FAIRLY once and for all.
There is no place for colonialism or apartheid (political or economic) in Zimbabwe and Southern Africa.
- Posted by VincentOnce again when it comes to some of the above excremental posts (posted whenever Mugabe is mentioned), it makes me wonder if I have wandered into the Twilight Zone - like people have a grip on reality? Some hope!
An election IS NOT an election if there is only ONE candidate. That is an essential fact that only a psychotic, spiteful and violent being like Mugabe would ignore. He must be incredibly stupid!
How anyone can try to justify or even trabsfer the blame for what is a litany of violence carried out on Mugabe’s orders by his monstrous thugs, only the creator knows.
The level of torture, maming and murder has shocked and disgusted us all and yet still Mugabe’s supporters peddle their poisonous lies, recriminations and ridiculous misinformation.
The facts speak for themselves and I can assure his supporters that if they are in any way connected to the violence and abuses, they themselves will eventually stand trial and will be charged with ‘crimes against humanity’.
They will be brought to book, and Mugabe will be going to hell in a basket!
- Posted by The Truth Is...Mugabe’s rise to power was by confiscating white lands, and now Zimbabwe’s despot murders the oposition, and leads the desent into poverty.
The west always stands by and talks. Send in various unidentified fighter bombers, take out the infamous 5th Brigade, level Mugabes Command and Control communications, and this same Army, will desolve Mugabe’s leadership role. The Zimbabwe Army will do the rest with African international help. They will remove Mugabe, silence the ZANU-PF, take the militants off the streets. The Army needs only to remember that elections must take place freely with-in 6 months.
The ZANU-PF may lead today, tomorrow they maybe the ones dying for retributions sake.
- Posted by Mike GutierrezVincent.
I have tried after your previous posting to avoid a direct debate with you but you have posed a question directly to me so I reply:
Your point is really a moral Catch 22. Such issues are as in this case very complex and what is known as a “wicked problem” and dependent on your perspective. The moral dilema here is that without the denial of access to international funding mechanisms would rural poor in Zimbabwe be better off?
A famous quote of Ian Smith was “in Rhodesia we have the happiest Africans in the world.” Economically the “Africans” in Rhodesia did have access to food and health services in a stable economic environment (i remember when a coke cost 5 cents and we had a 2.5 cent piece - the “ticky”). But this was only in a system based on racial oppression that denied fundamental political rights to blacks (Rhodesia Front paranoia) … it was untennable locally and internationally. A liberation war was launched and international sanctions applied to the minority regime. Who suffered? Was the suffering justified? Do the means justify the end?
In Zimbabwe Mugabe has justified his political oppression on the arguments of land and an attempt by Britain to re-colonise Zimbabwe. One thing that is often overlooked in the discussion of this issue is the land reform programme that operated from 1979 to 2000. As an employee of the Zimbabwe Government from the mid 1980s to the mid 1990s and working on issues of rural development - I can tell you that we had a land reform programme and farms were being purchased for resettlement. It was more than willing buyer willing seller since every farm that was put up for sale first had to be offered to Government. Often we did not want those farms and issued certificates of non-interest. What happened after 2000 was not land reform. It was chaos! Orchestrated chaos driven by paranoia (ZANU PF paranoia)and a desire to maintain political control. The primary objective of the liberation struggle to achieve political freedom was sacrificed by the same leader that had brought so much hope in 1980. Who suffers?
The land taken after 2000 has for the most part not benefitted “landless blacks” but has been the subject of elite capture. There is a new land holding minority in Zimbabwe only this time they are black and they are almost exclusively Zanu Pf. Who suffers?
At independence we were extremely self sufficient with little dependence on international finacing instruments. It was Mugabe who “supped from the cup” of international finance and it was a poison that he was to suffer from later. I believe that Mugabe thought he could replace “disloyal” white farmers with “loyal” Zanu Pf cadres and achieve the same independence and productive output - he was wrong - Who suffers?
International finance is highly problematic at the best of times but I do not accept that it is part of some Machiavellian plot to re-colonise Zimbabwe. I had my problems with donors when working for Government but to be honest they were not trying to take over Zimbabwe as Zanu Pf would have us believe.
No Vincent I believe that the keys to international finance are in the hands of Zanu Pf BUT the price they would have to pay - losing political control through truly open and free elections - is a price they are not prepared to pay yet. So who suffers?
- Posted by Tashinga