Africa News blog

African business, politics and lifestyle

Saving Kenyan forest. Is it a turning point?

September 3, 2008

mau-forest3.jpgAfter a decade of rampant destruction of the Mau forest water catchment in western Kenya, the country’s coalition government seems firmly united in trying to save the complex before more serious damage is inflicted on the economy.

U.N. officials say this is no longer simply an environmental issue but something that has huge importance for the whole country. Already two of the top three foreign exchange earners — tourism and tea — are feeling the impact of falling water levels which have also forced the postponement of a major hydro-electric project. 

Prime Minister Raila Odinga describes the forest’s destruction as a national emergency. Both foreign and local officials say there is no gap between Odinga and President Mwai Kibaki on the issue.

Saving the forest will involve huge costs to resettle and compensate some of the thousands of people living illegally there and restore tree cover which produces vital supplies of water. Officials say they expect international donors to provide major financial help.

Flamingoes wade in the waters of Lake Nakuru
Until a few months ago, the destruction of the forest was a familiar story of land grabbing, illegal logging and the allocation of government land to try to win votes. It began in 1997 when the government of Daniel arap Moi gave large plots away in exchange for electoral support.

Then, this year, the United Nations flew Odinga and other officials over the forest to show them the extent of the destruction, shocking them into urgent action.

The government is pushing ahead despite the fact that many of the area’s MPs and voters belong to Odinga’s ODM party. Unlike the past, political considerations are being pushed to one side in the national interest. U.N. officials call this process unique for a country long blighted by the depradations of powerful and greedy politicians.

This momentum is all the more striking because Odinga and Kibaki were bitter enemies before and during a bloody political crisis in the first two months of this year when around 1,500 people died in tribally-based clashes following the president’s disputed victory in an election.

Does the Mau forest issue mark a turning point in Kenyan politics or is it a one-off. What do you think?

Comments

On environment, there is no national interest. The PM is just playing to the international gallery. He need to win international support especially UN’s and World Bank, what better way to do it than Mau forest. Locally, he wants to create an enemy. It is politics,a politician has to appeal to a wider constituency and what better way that to let the rest of the country see that some people are fighting him when he wants to work?
By the way, some politicians are still logging even with all the attention. Anybody serious about conserving Mau forest should also talk tough on logging not only that forest but others in Kenya( there is big scandal on sandalwood and other indigenous tree that play important role in trapping carbon) Bottom line, we need a big national transformation in Kenya to really care about our environment.

Posted by Rose | Report as abusive
 

This is very encouraging but very unfortunate to see that still there are some of the politicians who want a compromise on this grave issue, and i also personally think that why get financial help for a mess we have created?? it beats logic, let the government and politicians come up with the money to compensate the so called “squatters”, they are the cause of all this in the first place, our ecosystem is at the mercy of tribal leaders who only think of political sustainability but not sustaining life. We are waiting to see what happens on this issue, meanwhile i ask fellow kenyans to plant at least a tree on there birthday or once a year and to care for the tree, if we want nature to be kind to us let us be kind to it.

Posted by Jon Two fifty | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •