Comments on: Will Bashir warrant worsen war?

By: Matt

Matt — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:37:20 +0000

Intriguing, but I’m inclined to think this morally correct decision will not be the proper means to an end….a very sad situation.

By: LastReplay

LastReplay — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:02:34 +0000

I see the ICC move not really as a surprise.

With Zbigniew Brzezinski as Obama’s Geopolitical advisor and after reading “The Grand Chessboard”!

You can already see all Geopolitical decisions becoming reality as I write.

This is a direct economic attack against China, all these African wars that will follow will be fought under the Cloak of Humanitarian issues.

I love the timing of US foreign Geopolitical policies with Zbigniew Brzezinski involved it’s like following MEIN KAMPF life in the 21st century.

al-Bashir is a bad guy yes, but why now all of a sudden right out of nothing after all that time?

Were gonna be seeing, a deal with Taliban, destabilization of Pakistan, a deal with Iran just to piss Russia off and 2-3 Humanitarian UN wars with Mandates in Africa while Obama will sell it the African people in the same way his face duped most of Europe and 80% of America.

I suggest everyone should read Brzezinski’s book to have a outlook of what is being tried. Code named “second chance”

“The Grand Chessboard”!

By: Daniel

Daniel — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:10:32 +0000

I can understand the global policy reason for issuing the warrant, but how about actually charging him with Genocide?

By: jd

jd — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:14:44 +0000

anonymous & co are right: the eu & icc are paper tigers and midget-kickers; islamist governments see harbis as a dime a dozen. albashir’s opponents need arms and training so that they can deal with their problem as they know how to best

By: JJ

JJ — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:47:44 +0000

Its trajic but EU is a toothless tiger……….

By: Princess Mononoke

Princess Mononoke — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:55:40 +0000

I cannot believe many of these posted comments claiming neo-colonism and the west wanting to stifle China oil trade. The ICC has found this monster GUILTY of committing HORRIFIC CRIMES against HUMANITY!

What do you not get?

Over 300,000 human beings were RAPED, TORTURED and SLAUGHTERED at the command of this monster! The millions of others that barely survived, had their villages (homes) burned to the ground and forced to move as far away as possible. Now this monster is proving the ICC right by expelling 13 NGO’s leaving MILLIONS without basic food and water! Now this idiot WILL be guilty of GENOCIDE!

Again what is it that you do not get?

By: M Bokh

M Bokh — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 16:10:42 +0000

I find the ICC decision very strange. It seems someone is doing business. Otherwise, what is the point? See! did they thought what could happen to Sudan? If the active militia’s feel that tehy have been supported by the ICC, that simply means to will but in more warriors in to the field to ensure that they kill as much as they want because in the end whatever they do, ICC and its supporters will cover up and say it is the Al Bashir government doing it. It seems the justice will never be justice for Africa. Even the ICC is unjsut.

By: Savo Heleta

Savo Heleta — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 15:12:24 +0000

I also fully agree with Anonymous above!

The most likely scenario is that al-Bashir will remain in power in Sudan and continue business as usual. In this case, the conflict in Darfur will continue and even escalate further, while the Sudanese opposition and freedom of speech and expression are violently suppressed.

Justice is very important for the victims, post-conflict reconciliation, and the future of Darfur and Sudan. However, the aim of the international community should be to first bring peace to Darfur and then punish the perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

By: Jalal Wadrawa

Jalal Wadrawa — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:17:55 +0000

I think the route the ICC started to take is taking it to its grave . When we see the obvious, in Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan which has been going on for years without doing anything and like nothing is happening, then where is the justice the court is looking to accomplish.I think the international organizations are becoming the new tool of colonization. I don\’t really mind when the ICC or any other organization take a guilty person to try him for his or her crimes, but when it becomes selective and politicized that is when questions are raised.The worst happened in other places let us see if ICC is going to get these criminals to justice or will the law stay applicable to the poor and those who got no voice or veto power.It is becoming a corrupt body and it got to go.

By: buffalojump

buffalojump — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:15:17 +0000

A waste of time and money. Anonymous statement is very accurate.

Cut the ICC because the resources could be better used to help others in a more direct way.