<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is an independent south Sudan now inevitable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/2009/11/04/is-an-independent-south-sudan-now-inevitable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/2009/11/04/is-an-independent-south-sudan-now-inevitable/</link>
	<description>African business, politics and lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:18:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: apollosan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/2009/11/04/is-an-independent-south-sudan-now-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-9875</link>
		<dc:creator>apollosan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 11:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/?p=2278#comment-9875</guid>
		<description>Clearly more of this article is needed. The commenter believes that there are lots of valuable fact that can be found in this article. Often times readers are looking for fast information, something that is reliable, comprehensive and easy to understand. And the writer just did it! This and its unparalleled presentation is something that must be laud. More developments will be coming and the readers are proud to be part of it.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rentalprotectionagency.com/tenant-screening.php&quot;&gt;Tenant Screening&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly more of this article is needed. The commenter believes that there are lots of valuable fact that can be found in this article. Often times readers are looking for fast information, something that is reliable, comprehensive and easy to understand. And the writer just did it! This and its unparalleled presentation is something that must be laud. More developments will be coming and the readers are proud to be part of it.<br />
Tenant Screening</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meja</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/2009/11/04/is-an-independent-south-sudan-now-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-8192</link>
		<dc:creator>meja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/?p=2278#comment-8192</guid>
		<description>yes!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Karam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/2009/11/04/is-an-independent-south-sudan-now-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-6098</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Karam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/?p=2278#comment-6098</guid>
		<description>Arab countries historically wanted always to be united as long as long as one country rules the other(s). In Sudan, union with the South has always been with the North ruling the South. With such a difference in cultures and so much distrust, it will do no harm for them to separate. Thereafter, if they still need each other, co-operation could carry on for instance with the export of oil from the South and the refining in the North and hopefully other sectors. As for Sharia Law, the North could be freer to apply it if they so wish and the South would not feel threatened by it anymore. And maybe one day like in Europe, African countries may find a common ground to unite including the North and the South of Sudan whilst maintaining still that sense of independence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arab countries historically wanted always to be united as long as long as one country rules the other(s). In Sudan, union with the South has always been with the North ruling the South. With such a difference in cultures and so much distrust, it will do no harm for them to separate. Thereafter, if they still need each other, co-operation could carry on for instance with the export of oil from the South and the refining in the North and hopefully other sectors. As for Sharia Law, the North could be freer to apply it if they so wish and the South would not feel threatened by it anymore. And maybe one day like in Europe, African countries may find a common ground to unite including the North and the South of Sudan whilst maintaining still that sense of independence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmmmm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/2009/11/04/is-an-independent-south-sudan-now-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-6042</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmmmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/?p=2278#comment-6042</guid>
		<description>Is Nigeria the next one to split? They too have a major Islam-Christian divide and plenty of oil to share</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Nigeria the next one to split? They too have a major Islam-Christian divide and plenty of oil to share</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fidele</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/2009/11/04/is-an-independent-south-sudan-now-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-5973</link>
		<dc:creator>fidele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/?p=2278#comment-5973</guid>
		<description>i advocate the idea of divide the soudan in two part that&#039;s a good idea the africa countries are bigger that why they have failed to gorvored the entire continent let the south  sudan split from the north where the arabe a roued in evil way ofdiscrimmnation africa people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i advocate the idea of divide the soudan in two part that&#8217;s a good idea the africa countries are bigger that why they have failed to gorvored the entire continent let the south  sudan split from the north where the arabe a roued in evil way ofdiscrimmnation africa people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raannaath</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/2009/11/04/is-an-independent-south-sudan-now-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-5949</link>
		<dc:creator>Raannaath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/?p=2278#comment-5949</guid>
		<description>I would like to comment that let south Sudan to look themselve as new state if we want peace, or if want another war let the rulling parties of Sudan talking about the unity Sudan. No peace at all for unity because we are the Sudanese we fail to done the attractive unity and to late this time, let the south declare their independent as new country. South and north are reality differents for everthing to live togathers with Arabas north. Thank to God to bring the CPA by westministers ideologies of saving life of all worlds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to comment that let south Sudan to look themselve as new state if we want peace, or if want another war let the rulling parties of Sudan talking about the unity Sudan. No peace at all for unity because we are the Sudanese we fail to done the attractive unity and to late this time, let the south declare their independent as new country. South and north are reality differents for everthing to live togathers with Arabas north. Thank to God to bring the CPA by westministers ideologies of saving life of all worlds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kuku Abdul Rassa3</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/2009/11/04/is-an-independent-south-sudan-now-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-5923</link>
		<dc:creator>Kuku Abdul Rassa3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/?p=2278#comment-5923</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately it is highly likely that Sudan will split. Both new countries will suffer enormously. They will both have their micro-civi war. It won&#039;t be North against South, but it will be perceived marginalised minorities against the new central governments. The South will be worse since it has much more disgruntled jobless youth. If both parts of Sudan believe they want better future, they should look around them and learn from countris trying to unify in order to face global problems. Sudan should be aspiring to African unity, not splitting nations. Both parts should stop criticising each other. Yes, Northern government was involved in militant Islam in the past and were keen on Sharia law. But, this is history. Southern goverment is partially corrupt. But they have done significant good deeds trying to build their region from scratch. Yes, money was blundered in the South. But as we know, the blunderers and facilitatators are Ugandans, Kenynas and Ethiopians. The North should admire what the SPLM done during the past few years. The South should also acknowledge the good deeds that Northern govrenment has done, including partnering in peace. I hope the South can have an option of voting for extending the transitional period. A longer peaceful period may build trust and pave the way to keep the country unified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately it is highly likely that Sudan will split. Both new countries will suffer enormously. They will both have their micro-civi war. It won&#8217;t be North against South, but it will be perceived marginalised minorities against the new central governments. The South will be worse since it has much more disgruntled jobless youth. If both parts of Sudan believe they want better future, they should look around them and learn from countris trying to unify in order to face global problems. Sudan should be aspiring to African unity, not splitting nations. Both parts should stop criticising each other. Yes, Northern government was involved in militant Islam in the past and were keen on Sharia law. But, this is history. Southern goverment is partially corrupt. But they have done significant good deeds trying to build their region from scratch. Yes, money was blundered in the South. But as we know, the blunderers and facilitatators are Ugandans, Kenynas and Ethiopians. The North should admire what the SPLM done during the past few years. The South should also acknowledge the good deeds that Northern govrenment has done, including partnering in peace. I hope the South can have an option of voting for extending the transitional period. A longer peaceful period may build trust and pave the way to keep the country unified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lydie Boka</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/2009/11/04/is-an-independent-south-sudan-now-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-5900</link>
		<dc:creator>Lydie Boka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/africanews/?p=2278#comment-5900</guid>
		<description>They have tried, but with the glaring differences that have appeared, the north and the south look like an odd couple.  Indeed, how can they reconcile things like sharia? With regard to resources, oil and water will be indeed major challenges as they need each other for efficient resource management. What will Egypt do? It depends on the south for its water supply. Will there be a rapprochement with Juba or will it back Khartoum? How about Kenya, also be key for the south, and other neighbours?  The future will of course depend on great and middle powers policy: USA, Russia, China, France but also Iran.  StrategiCo. currently rates Sudan l2/l4 (l4 = maximum risk).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have tried, but with the glaring differences that have appeared, the north and the south look like an odd couple.  Indeed, how can they reconcile things like sharia? With regard to resources, oil and water will be indeed major challenges as they need each other for efficient resource management. What will Egypt do? It depends on the south for its water supply. Will there be a rapprochement with Juba or will it back Khartoum? How about Kenya, also be key for the south, and other neighbours?  The future will of course depend on great and middle powers policy: USA, Russia, China, France but also Iran.  StrategiCo. currently rates Sudan l2/l4 (l4 = maximum risk).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
