Africa News blog

African business, politics and lifestyle

Can Africa shake the corruption curse?

November 17, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

African countries once again bring up the rear in this year’s Corruption Perceptions Index , a closely watched benchmark of how well – or badly – countries are tackling graft.

Of the 47 countries reviewed in the region, corruption was perceived by executives to be “rampant” in 31, and a “serious challenge” in 13. Only three countries – Botswana, Mauritius and Cape Verde – got anything like a clean bill of health.

But amid the gloom are some interesting developments compared to last year’s table, suggesting the right mix of anti-corruption policy – plus a dose of rosy public relations – can help individual countries shake off the kind of reputation that scares investors off.

Perhaps the most stunning ascent this year was that of Liberia, storming up the chart from 138th to 97th this year, putting it well ahead of relative giants such as Argentina and Indonesia.

Monrovia has long received plaudits for its “zero tolerance” policy on graft, while its effort to buy back outstanding government debt has also soothed investor nerves. President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf won explicit backing from the United States earlier this year, when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stopped off on a trip through Africa to tell her she was on “the right track”.

Over the coming years, the eyes of the world will be on how Liberia uses its share of the the proceeds from a multibillion-barrel offshore oil frontier off its coast and that of neighbouring Sierra Leone.

Likewise, Sierra Leone itself appears to be on a modest role, climbing 12 places to 146th position. The credibility of its anti-corruption drive received a boost earlier this month when it indicted the health minister on suspicion of mishandling a medical supply contract.

Sceptics noted that the indictment – the first involving an acting public official since the creation of the country’s Anti-Corruption Commission in 2000 – came just weeks before a high-profile investor conference in London.

Among the losers, Senegal stands out. Long perceived as one of the easier parts of West Africa to do business in, it even one a U.S. grant worth $540 million from the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) this year in recognition of its good governance.

Does the fact that it has slipped from 85th place to 99th position suggest that the accolade is out of kilter with perceptions of those doing business there now?

Transparency International, the Berlin-based watchdog that puts together the report, concludes that the various anti-corruption reforms going on in the region will come to nothing unless there is a genuine will to properly implement them.

In that sense, a U.N.-sponsored deal in Vienna last week under which countries will from 2011 have to file reports what specific action they are taking against corruption may be a step forward – although civil society groups complain that those reports will not be sufficiently independent.

Can anything be done to help Africa shake off the corruption curse?

Comments

A list of the African country standings would be interesting, also to do valid comparisons. Examples of cases under investigation should be provided, also indicating the counterparty.As long as the World Bank Governance tick list is not coaxed and complied with, nothing will change. The continent should be split into a northern and southern union, as the morals, rules and ethics differ vastly.I recall reading that the ‘accepted’ tolerance bribe indicator is 10% of any deal. These land up in ‘special accounts’ as an expense item, almost like an advertising budget.

Posted by Casper | Report as abusive
 

I’ve seen articles on the significance of the CPI for Africa, for the UK and many other countries, but none about the United States’ perennial 18-19th rank for the last 10 years. Amazingly, our rating doesn’t seem to have suffered from two stolen presidential elections or eight years of the most corrupt, incompetent, lying regime in our nation’s history. I suspect that the reason for the blackout is that even the suggestion of corruption in the US would be considered treasonous, which self-deception is itself another heartbreaking indicator of corruption.

Posted by I. Remember America | Report as abusive
 

This is the link on the Transparency International website from where you can download the sub-Saharan African standings:http://www.transparency.org/po licy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2009/r egional_highlights

Posted by Mark John | Report as abusive
 

The question should be “Can Africa shake the African curse?”My money, and some minor considerations called logic and history, say no.

Posted by Mike | Report as abusive
 

Greed. That pretty much sums up the flawed human instict. Greed and corruption not only exists in Africa and the US, but everywhere. Anywhere a human exists there will be greed. The ability to rise to power and control the people is driven by greed. But government on the other hand can be a good thing. If a government had honest people who didn’t let greed control them but they control the greed among the people, everything would be sunshine and buttercups. But unfortunately, some in power have been infected with greed and want more than their slice of the pie.To answer the question of Africa, unless you have honest men and women to control the urges of greed and fight to stamp greed out, my answer is no.

Posted by i,robert | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •