Africa News blog

African business, politics and lifestyle

The unnumbered dead

January 21, 2010

CONGO-DEMOCRATICThe simple answer to the question of how many people died in Congo’s civil war is “too many”.

Trying to get a realistic figure is fraught with difficulties and a new report suggests that a widely used estimate of 5.4 million dead – potentially making Congo the deadliest conflict since World War Two – is hugely inaccurate and that the loss of life may be less than half that.

The aid group that came up with the original estimate unsurprisingly says the new report is wrong.

The problem is the way estimates are reached.

One way is to do a body count, but that is next to impossible in a country like the Democratic Republic of Congo. Very few of the victims are shot, blown up or otherwise die as a result of violence. Most succumb to disease or malnutrition. But then who died as a result of the war and who would have died anyway in a country where survival is normally so tough?

That is where the other methodology comes in. It is based on using the difference between the rate at which people were dying before the war and the mortality rate once it has started. It should indicate the number of those who have died as both a direct and indirect result of the war. This sort of calculation led to the figure of 5.4 million dead in Congo.

The problem is that if you get the wrong mortality rates, even by a small margin, the estimate can be way off. That is what the Human Security Report Project says happened with the Congo figures. The International Rescue Committee stands by its estimate.

Basing estimates on mortality rates can also have odd consequences – for instance mortality rates for those being helped by aid agencies can fall to below pre-war levels in places where living conditions were already very poor – meaning that not only could the death toll fall over time but in a sense more people might be alive as a result of a war.

The Congo figures have been nowhere near as controversial as calculations for Iraq or Darfur, but once figures are repeated often enough they tend to become established and treated almost as fact.

The United Nations estimate for the Darfur death toll of 300,000 is another example of how figures can enter common usage. It originally came from John Holmes, U.N. under-secretary-general for humanitarian affairs, in April 2008.

“A study in 2006 suggested that 200,000 had lost their lives from the combined effects of the conflict. That figure must be much higher now, perhaps half as much again,” Holmes said, although he later described it as a “reasonable extrapolation”.

But because mortality rates were used in the 2006 study, the figure didn’t have to be much higher. It might even have been lower in some areas because of the immense efforts of humanitarian workers in reducing mortality rates for the millions of displaced.

While potentially wrong, such figures could have a use in drawing the eyes of the world to tragedies and finding the resources needed to end them. The question is whether, when challenged, they undermine the credibility of those who produce them? Then again, does it matter if they are wrong? Are those who challenge them at risk of harming efforts to save lives?

Picture: Roger Mbuliundo (L) weeps beside the body of his father Dieudonne Kulimbo, 60, who was shot and killed in northeastern Congo in Feb. 2009. REUTERS/Finbarr O’Reilly

Thank you for posting this story

Posted by DiggIt | Report as abusive

Can we question whether the civil war contributed to the overall total? Would aid organizations have provided support to a country entrenched in a civil war?

The numbers mean little here… 5.4 million or 2.7 million, when do we say that any death is one death too many?

Posted by sparxx | Report as abusive is looking for columnists to write on issues relating to Africa or other topic’s, You don’t need to be a journalist, anyone is welcome, register at

Posted by asksimba | Report as abusive

For more in-depth news about Africa, you may want to visit Newstime Africa – We cover the whole of Africa. You will get our views on this topic and much more.

Posted by Newstime | Report as abusive

A recent article in The Lancet by the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters gives an overview of mortality trends in Darfur:  /article/PIIS0140-6736(09)61967-X/abstr act

Posted by CE-DAT | Report as abusive

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see