Africa News blog

African business, politics and lifestyle

Nov 16, 2010 08:05 EST

Will Guinea accept Konate’s gift?

Photo

One of the first things you see when you arrive at the airport in Conakry is a poster of General Sekouba Konate, wearing fatigues, sunglasses and a red beret.

Drive into the city, and interspersed among the campaign billboards that cover the sides of major roadways, you’ll see more Konate posters – including one bearing the words “Sentinel de la Paix”, bringer of peace.

It seems appropriate to pay homage to the leader of Guinea’s military junta, who surprised many Guineans and much of the world for pushing hard to transfer his power to a civilian through free and fair elections – something the West African state has never experienced before.

“I don’t know of another soldier in Guinea who would have done that,” said General Ibrahim Balde, the head of Guinea’s national guard and election security forces during an interview last week. “What he has given the country is a real gift.”

Nearly five months after the first round of elections and more than a week after the run-off, Guinea’s electoral commission on Monday named veteran opposition leader Alpha Conde president-elect over rival Cellou Dalein Diallo, something the Supreme Court must now ratify.

But the process up to this point has been tortuous and turbulent, with clashes between rival political camps - including rioting in some neighbourhoods on Monday and overnight that security forces pushed back with live rounds.

Analysts are worried more trouble lies ahead.

COMMENT

The elections in Guinea is not a gift.It is inevitable that Guinea must hold elecions,as the people are tired of 50 years of dictatorship.Konate betrayed Moussa Dadis Camara because the malinke already had a plan of regaining power in Guinea,something they think rightfully belongs to them.Konate married a peul as a cover,to demonstrate to the rest of Ginea that he is not ethnocentric.

As far as the elections,he stole the first round from Sidya Toure in favor of Alpha Conde,then they orchestrated the conviction and sentencing of the then electoral commissioner,Sillah,who later died in a hospital in France.
Take note that Cellou Dalein Diallo had almost 44% of the vote in the 1st round to Alpha Conde’s 18%.Then Mr.Diallo was endorsed by Sidya Toure,who scored 13% and Abe Sillah,who scored 3%-do the math.
Then Alpha Conde started the process of delaying the elections.He started by asking for the corrections of irregularities.When he got that,he convinced Prme Minister Jean Mari Dore,an ardent supporter of his,to introduce a decree to be presented to the transition president Konate for his signature.The purpose was to transfer the responsibility of organising the elections from the electoral commission to the Ministry of the interior.Under extreme pressure from Cellou Dalein and his allies,they backed off.
Alpha Conde’s next move was to mount a coup within the electoral commission by pushing for the illegal election of his die-hard supporter Lounceni Camara as president,contrary to the rules governing that organ.All these events contributed to the postponement of elections for at least 4 or 5 times before it was finally held on November 7.
Few weeks prior to the elections,in a rally held in Conakry by Alpha Conde and his supporters,allegations spread by Mr.Conde’s alliance stated that members of the Peul ethnic group has poisoned Alpha Conde’s supporters,mostly malinkes with water manufactured by Peul business men.This led to series of attacks on the Peul residents of Siguiri,Kankan,Mandiana,et.,mostly malinke towns.A massive exodus of Peul residents followed,as their properties were destroyed and their lives in danger.

Due to the terror and intimidation of Diallo’s supporters ln these malinke dominated towns,his supporters there were not only refused their right to vote,but his representatives were also not allowed to be in the voting booths,and all this with Konate pretending to not see or know about.This not only gave them chance to stuff ballots in Mr.Conde’s favor,but is also a violation of the electoral code,meaning votes from those areas must be cancelled.More so,with all the violence on the Peul ethnic group,there were no reprisals.

Konate has further succeeded in convincing the international community that the military will not accept Mr.Diallo as president.Having exhausted so much time and effort on Guinea’s crisis,the international community wants to see an end and has settled to support the effprts of Konate,which are non order than having his fellow malinke imposed on the people and therefore,more control of government contracts of Konate,who has given all military reconstruction deals to his friend and business partner Kelfala Person Camara,alias KPC.

Since Alpha Conde was declared a winner on monday,the military has decended on the unarmed Peul population,conducting extra-judicial killings(Amnesty International has released statement on this).

If this is Konate’s gift to Guinea,his wives’ relatives(Peuls) are definately not getting a fair share.

Posted by algass | Report as abusive
Nov 8, 2010 15:34 EST

Guinea’s election – press conferences or scrums?

Photo

It remains to be seen if either candidate in Guinea’s presidential election knows how to run a country.

But after Sunday’s run-off election, during which the candidates wanted to say a few words to journalists after casting their ballots, it is clear that neither knows how to run a press conference.

Both events were like 1990s grunge mosh pits, only without the band, and with heavily armed soldiers herding the cameramen, photographers and text journalists together into a sweating and nervous mass.

Cellou Dallein Diallo’s took the cake. First of all, he was four hours later than initially scheduled. That gave the press corps lots of time to quietly set up cameras and tripods around his polling station, everyone negotiating sensibly and amicably for position. But it was all for nothing.

The scene suddenly exploded upon his arrival, with bulky soldiers in red berets and carrying automatic weapons storming through the journalists to make way for Diallo. People fell over backwards into the neighbourhood kids, who were chanting and leaping, pushing the other way in a volatile mix.

At one point, a soldier started whacking someone with the antenna of his walkie-talkie, sending the victim stumbling backwards into a table.

For a small taste of what it was like in Guinea during the Nov. 7 vote, have a look at this video.

Oct 28, 2010 15:09 EDT

Ready for elections in Ivory Coast and Guinea?

Photo

Barring last-minute upsets, Ivory Coast will go to the polls on Sunday, marking the end of a five-year limbo in which the incumbent president has ruled without any real mandate and the country stagnated without a sense of identity or direction.

The following weekend, neighbouring Guinea may finally hold the serially delayed second-round of its presidential election, hoped to end nearly two years of military rule whose defining moment was a massacre of pro-democracy marchers by the security forces in a sports stadium.

It can only be a good thing if the elections allow Ivory Coast and Guinea to draw a line under their past and move on. But is either country actually ready for them?

In Guinea any semblance of voting on a candidate’s policy proposals or merits has been jettisoned after June’s first round which, to no great surprise, set the stage for a run-off between Cellou Dallein Diallo and Alpha Conde — representatives of the large Peul and Malinke communities respectively.

Instead of hearing a meaningful political debate before the decisive second round, Guinean voters have watched a struggle for control of the national election commission, with both sides afraid of it falling into the hands of the rival ethnic group.

The stand-off was only solved by appointing a Malian as the temporary president of the body.

Things are only marginally better in Ivory Coast. One candidate, ex-premier and former IMF deputy chief Alassane Ouattara, declared this week there is “no way” that President Laurent Gbagbo could win the election, effectively pre-empting the choice of the Ivorian voter.

COMMENT

Although there is still a long way before they can become safer places, both countries are indeed making progress by going to the polls. Guinea could not continue be ruled by military regimes and Côte d’Ivoire could not go on without a clearly identified leader. Gbagbo was “ill-elected” in 2000 and the country did not have any elections for ten long years. It is better to have something resembling a return to normality than uncertainty and a suspension of aid. It is however likely that the process will be painful at least in the immediate post-election period, as in neither country will any of the main candidates lightly accept defeat. StrategiCo., http://www.strategico.fr, specialises in risk analysis in Africa and rates both countries as “high risk”.

Posted by lydieboka | Report as abusive
Mar 9, 2010 06:42 EST

Togo’s tension: democracy vs. stability

Photo

Maybe it was too early in the morning. Or perhaps their hearts just weren’t in it.

Whatever the case, a rally called by Togo ‘s opposition leaders for early Tuesday — meant to voice full-throated outrage over the March 4 election they say was rigged to favour the incumbent — was a near no-show.

Not even the opposition leaders turned up.

“It was a thousand or so youths, they burned a couple of tires and the police dispersed them,” said a Reuters witness. “The opposition leaders did not even come.”

Unclear if this was a good thing.

Togo’s March 4 election was seen as a test for democracy in Africa, a continent notorious for coups and flawed polls that have undermined efforts toward civilian rule. International observers have said the poll appeared fair.

But it was also seen as a test for Togo’s own ability to come through a presidential vote without bloodshed.

COMMENT

Stability or reliable business partners? To be fair the two tend to go together and tend also to go with development, but these are tendencies and usually diverge the longer stability is pursued. I admit that favoring democracy over stability can seem rather callous to those hurt by the instability, but before anyone would favor stability over democracy, let them ask themselves what if it were I marginalized by the lack of democracy. Then again, one might ask his or herself, what it were I hurt by the lack of stability.

Posted by InfiniteRand | Report as abusive
Jan 15, 2010 09:57 EST

Guinea tests Western influence in Africa

Photo

Whether Guinea’s absent junta leader Moussa Dadis Camara makes it back to his home country or not will be the latest test of Western powers’ dwindling influence in Africa.

Ex-colonial power France and the United States — desperate to avoid a failed state in a region which is already attracting the interest of narco-traffickers and other criminals — have both made it clear Camara should be kept well away.

French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner warned Camara’s homecoming after treatment in Morocco following an assassination bid could spark an all-out civil war.

After talks with French and U.S. diplomats, caretaker junta leader Sekouba Konate announced last week that he would work with a prime minister from the opposition in a transition government that would hold democratic elections.

It all seemed to be going according to the script until Camara flew into Burkina Faso on Tuesday night, walking (with some help) and talking.

It seems Camara thought he was heading back to Conakry and was livid when he was told the Moroccan airplane had pitched up in the Burkinabe capital Ouagadougou.

A delegation of Camara allies immediately flew out to fetch him, but headed into a row with Konate. Guinea-watchers have been told to look out for some kind of statement from Burkina’s President Blaise Compaore on what happens next.

COMMENT

For more in-depth news about Africa, you may want to visit Newstime Africa http://www.newstimeafrica.com – We cover the whole of Africa. You will get our views on this topic and much more.

Posted by Newstime | Report as abusive
Jan 7, 2010 07:32 EST

Guinea junta’s new democracy pledge

Photo

Guinea’s acting ruler has promised to restore civilian rule and made clear that military leader Moussa Dadis Camara will be out of action for some time after an assassination bid – raising questions over whether Camara will return from hospital in Morocco.

Although Sekouba Konate did not explicitly declare that he had taken over from Camara, his pledge to create a national unity government with opposition figures has effectively sidelined Camara and made him the key player in the junta for now.

The timing of the move is significant, coming little more than a day after Konate visited Camara in a Moroccan hospital and then went on to hold talks with U.S. and French diplomats in Rabat who encouraged him to begin a transition to civilian rule.

But a healthy slice of caution is required.

Although Konate is a professional soldier who has not shown any personal political ambition, he is a junta stalwart who has enjoyed the trappings of power and whose democratic credentials have yet to be tested.

He promised to retire from the scene if no longer needed – a pledge reminiscent of Camara’s early vows that his rule was only temporary.

The threat of a counter-coup from within Guinea’s unruly army can never be ruled out. The prospect of a return to civilian rule will in particular alarm those soldiers who took part in mass killings and rapes on September 28 last year and might face justice over the atrocities which brought down global condemnation on the junta.

Dec 24, 2009 06:23 EST

Lessons for coup makers?

Photo

President Barack Obama’s decision to end trade benefits for Guinea, Madagascar and Niger shows some stiffening of Washington’s resolve to act against those seen to be moving in the opposite direction to demands for greater democracy in Africa.

But the fact that new benefits were simultaneously extended to Mauritania may also give a lesson in how would-be coup makers should best behave if they want to get away with it.

In the first three countries, there is no clear idea as to how they will return to a form of government more acceptable in the eyes of Western countries or those of their neighbours.

Guinea and Madagascar in particular both look in real danger of much greater turmoil.

In Mauritania, President Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz overthrew an elected president in 2008 – the country’s first freely elected president – but managed to get elections organised and himself voted into office by July, although the ballot was condemned by his opponents.

Perhaps crucially for the Western support, he also swiftly promised to cooperate in fighting al-Qaeda in the Sahara.

Uncertainty over transitions in both Guinea and Madagascar has stoked internal instability as well as costing foreign assistance.

COMMENT

It shows that if you are “strategic” enough (either because of Al qaeda or oil, other natural resources, competition with China), you may get away with it even with questionable elections. Aziz removed a democratically-elected president, held elections which he won and was quickly recognised as the president of Mauritania by the AU and then the EU, and the USA. Would it have been the case without the threat of Al qaeda? The lesson is that not only you need elections, but for them to be quickly accepted, you need something bigger and Aziz played the right card from the beginning (fight against terrorism).

Posted by lydieboka | Report as abusive
Nov 24, 2009 10:16 EST

Is the “wonga” running out for Africa’s mercenaries?

Photo

Africa’s infamous “dogs of war” may still be going strong, but it seems the rewards of the mercenary life aren’t quite what they used to be.  

Only this month, Britain’s Simon Mann won a pardon for his part in a foiled 2004 coup attempt on Equatorial Guinea, an old-style adventure whose glittering prize was the central African state’s multi-billion-dollar oil riches.

Contrast that to reports last week that a band of South African and other mercenaries had flown into the chaos of Guinea to train up a militia loyal to the incumbent junta leader — on a salary put at barely $3,500 a month. 

That’s not bad money in most parts of the world, and there were reports that the company involved would have won extra remuneration in the form of minerals from Guinea’s fecund soil.

But it would have been peanuts to Mann, whose Equatorial Guinea coup was known as the “Wonga Plot” after the English slang for the money they hoped to yield in buckets. 

While mercenaries are often seen as in the business of bringing governments down, it is not new that they should be trying to prop one up, as is happening in Guinea.

Mann himself is reported to have worked for the Angolan government in the 1990s to help it wrest back control of a key port from rebels, and again for Sierra Leonean authorities in the 2002 civil war there.

COMMENT

I have a understanding that these “mercenaries” in Africa had or have a stabilizing effect in parts of Africa. What has happened to the countries effected now and who in Africa benefits from there being a moratorium on there practices? I believe there only fault was that they were too effective and political and finacial power at this level spins a different picture of life before there involvement. Who is benefitting now?

Posted by David Hill | Report as abusive
Sep 29, 2009 12:47 EDT

Do Guinea’s dark days reveal junta’s colours?

Photo

In Guinea this week, at least 157 people were killed when security forces opened fire on a demonstration against military junta leader Captain Moussa Dadis Camara, according to a local rights group.

Much has changed since I visited the country in April and May this year. Then, the young Camara — or “Dadis” as most Guineans refer to him – did not look particularly dangerous despite his images staring out from walls, buildings and roundabouts all over Conakry, and cassettes of his speeches on sale in the markets.

“Long live peace” was the graffiti of choice, and if expectations of real improvements in living standards were low, at least soldiers were in the barracks rather than shooting in the streets.

What was clear then was that a certain degree of patience had been extended to Camara both domestically and internationally.

Relief that the power vacuum opened by the death of former President Lansana Conte had not collapsed into violence, and populist anti-corruption rhetoric carried most Guineans through the first uneasy months. At the same time the international community swallowed its distaste for a military regime with the sweetening promise of elections by the end of the year.

As long as peace and the election timetable held, and Camara himself wasn’t tempted into standing, Guineans and foreign partners would grit their teeth and give Camara and his National Council for Democracy and Development (CNDD) breathing space to manage the transition.

That patience, which had shown signs of strain in recent months, has now run out. International condemnation has been swift and harsh for the deaths at the demonstration.

COMMENT

This vile Guinean leadership is a well qualified candidate for the Hague court’s cells, this Camara and many other leaders in Africa are not fit for purpose.

Posted by Nduka Tolefe | Report as abusive
  •