Africa News blog
African business, politics and lifestyle
Stormy seas ahead for the pirates?
A new spate of attacks on shipping has made it quite clear that Somali pirates are not going to stop their activities just now, even though military operations by the United States and France have killed five of the buccaneers.
The international naval flotilla is stretched to protect the thousands of ships that use the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean.
Another reason for the pirates’ boldness is believed to have been the onset of good weather, which favours the small speed boats they use to stalk the lumbering merchantmen.
But if the navies’ capabilities are limited by the vast sea area they have to cover, the pirates may soon face a more compelling reason to rein in their activities, as my colleague Abdi Sheikh in Mogadishu reports.
“The sea is calm now, but by May it will be terrible to sail on the Indian Ocean,” said Somali pirate Farah Hussein.
“Our attacks on ships will probably decrease in the coming month. But we might move to the Gulf of Aden to continue our mission,” he told Reuters by telephone.
If the pirates have to confine themselves to the Gulf of Aden, it should be easier for the naval flotilla to catch them, shouldn’t it?
Keeping pirates at bay
There are some expectations that piracy in the Gulf of Aden is about to tail off for a bit. It appears that pirates don’t like rough weather any more than anyone else does.
Exclusive Analysis, a political risk consultancy, has conducted a detailed study of incidences of maritime hijacking in order to give its insurer clients the heads up about when and under what circumstances piracy is most likely to occur. It has told the International Underwriting Association of London that the arrival of the monsoon in the Gulf of Aden about now usually keeps pirates on shore. Not so for Somalia, where the waters are generally calmer at the moment. Technically, it is when the Sea Scale hits 5 or 6, that is, rough to very rough.
Weather was not the only factor thrown up by the study when it comes to keeping pirates at bay. Among an array of conditions, it found that ships that have freeboards — the distance from waterline to deck — of six metres or more have a lesser chance of being hijacked.
One pirate ship, apparently, was found with a five metre ladder on board — a hint as to how far they are prepared to go, or at least climb.
Why is the world being so damned politically correct on the somali pirates? In a more civilized time pirates were hung when captured, end of problem.
from Pakistan: Now or Never?:
And now the Chinese navy in Somali waters…
Chinese naval ships may soon be steaming into the Gulf of Aden to join a growing fleet of international warships fighting Somali pirates.
A first probably for a navy that has long confined itself to its own waters, the move is certain to stir interest in the strategic community stretching from New Delhi to Washington.
Chinese state media on Wednesday quoted Vice Foreign Minister He Yafei as telling a UN Security Council meeting that Beijing was considering sending naval ships on escort duty in the troubled waters.
On the face of it, as Beijing would argue, too much should not be read into its naval deployment off the Somali waters. Theirs will be one of a number of navies patrolling the region such as the United States, India, Greece, Saudi Arabia, France, Russia, Britain and Pakistan. Besides, Chinese vessels have been attacked by the pirates in recent months giving them as much justification for escort duty as anyone else operating there. The latest was on Tuesday when a Chinese fishing vessel was seized in the Gulf of Aden, along with three other ships including a yacht.
But China's military has been the subject of relentless scrutiny and any move it makes will be closely watched especially in regional capitals such as Tokyo and New Delhi. India, one of the biggest navies in the Indian Ocean boasting of an aircraft carrier group, has long looked over its shoulder watching for signs of a creeping Chinese naval presence in the Indian Ocean.
If nothing else, its role in helping Pakistan build its Gwadar port on the Baluchistan coast is a matter of concern for Indian navy planners who worry that the deep water port is a key element of China's "String of Pearls" strategy of extending its influence from the South China Sea through the Indian Ocean and on to the Arabian Gulf through a chain of outposts.
China can afford to pay the pirates the money they demand which would more or less same amount that is spent on deploying navy. They can negotiate better with pirates, than any other nation. Somebody have to publish the make of arms used by pirates!!
THe main reason for sending navy is, there is shipment destined for Iran/Pak conatining things which they dont want world to know. They want to save from embarasement if that ship is caught by pirates. They dont want to in situation of MV Faina!!
from Global News Journal:
What should the world do about Somalia?
Islamist militants imposing a strict form of Islamic law are knocking on the doors of Somalia's capital, the country's president fears his government could collapse -- and now pirates have seized a super-tanker laden with crude oil heading to the United States from Saudi Arabia.
Chaos, conflict and humanitarian crises in Somalia are hardly new. It's a poor, dry nation where a million people live as refugees and 10,000 civilians have been killed in the Islamist-led insurgency of the last two years. A fledgling peace process looks fragile. Any hopes an international peacekeeping force will soon come to the rescue of a country that has become the epitome of anarchic violence are optimistic, at best.
But besides causing instability in the Horn of Africa, the turmoil onshore is spilling into the busy waters of the Gulf of Aden. The European Union and NATO have beefed up patrols of this key trade route linking Asia to Europe via the Suez Canal as more and more ships fall prey to piracy. Attacks off the coast of east Africa also threaten vital food aid deliveries to Somalia.
As insurance premiums for ships rocket and carriers start taking the long route from Asia to Europe around the Cape of Good Hope to avoid attack, the cost of manufactured goods and commodities such as oil is likely to rise -- all at a time of global economic uncertainty and looming recession in major industrialised countries.
Unfortunately, this situation has escalated while other issues have absorbed our strategic attention. Today, we should begin viewing this area as a strategic “front”…the grey area between commercial interests and national interests. Note the number of nation states with deployed naval forces in the region. This is unprecedented in the modern age. Many “actors” have a stake in this…and there is no nation state or commercial company with a credible position of leadership…
Somalia’s mean sealanes
It’s the stuff for a Hollywood blockbuster to rival Ridley Scott’s 2001 thriller “Black Hawk Down”: A bunch of 50 Somali pirates in speedboats and heavily armed with grenade launchers clamber aboard a Ukranian ship in the Gulf of Aden. They overwhelm the 20-man crew and take control of the ship and its dubious cargo of 33 battle tanks, supposedly destined for the Kenyan military. Six days later and with US navy ships stalking, a shootout breaks out on board among the pirates, killing three.
The hijacking of the MV Faina is only the most high-profile of what is turning into the biggest scourge of sea piracy in modern times. According to the International Maritime Bureau, presumed Somali pirates have attacked more than 60 ships in the area this year. It’s piracy alert website reported on Sept. 26 that four ships had been attacked in the Gulf of Aden within a 48-hour period.
“Intelligence sources revealed that there are now three suspicious vessels in the Gulf of Aden believed to be pirate mother vessels looking to attack ships with the intent to hijack,” it said.
Somali pirates taking advantage of chaos onshore, where an Islamist insurgency has raged for nearly two years, have intensified attacks this year on vessels plying the main water route linking Asia and the Middle East to Europe. Somalia has been a dysfunctional state since 1991. The upsurge in piracy has sent shipping insurance costs soaring tenfold, according to Lloyds List, and prompting shipowners to call for tougher international action. The alternative would be rerouting sea trade through the Cape of Good Hope, adding thousands of miles to the journey.
An international coalition of 19 states has been scrambling to keep the waterways in the region safe, but its own warships run the risk of deadly attack. France has been championing international action against Somali pirates. It sent its commandos twice this year to rescue its yachts seized in the region and is now spearheading United Nations action to deal with piracy.
What should be the correct international response to the problem? Should the world’s big powers increase their military presence in the Gulf of Aden to protect vital sea lanes? How should the international community address the fundamental issue of chaos in Somalia itself? Can piracy in the region be contained without a solution to the Somali crisis?
I am utterly amazed how people who have no idea of what is happening can talk about things and critisize other people (Liban).
The coast of somaia has been subjected to ruthless people who illigally exploited the maritime resources of Somalia and dumped toxic waste, these people simply don’t care about the environmental, social or economic consequences to the people of their actions.
As Liban says the locals set out to defend their livelihoods as they had no othe alternative. However the situation spiralled out of control and has now become difficult to resolve. To say that violence is all somali people know, as Carlos is implying, is a deeply insulting and ill informed statement. I can sense that some of you are angered at what is happening but that is no excuse for statements such as “Somalian pirates do not deserve humane treatment” and “we have to go in we kill them all. Maybe it will deter others”. What, so are pirates that are of non somali origin to receive humane treatment? Voilance and this kind of rhetoric is not the answer, we have seen that in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The shameful revelation of illigal arms smuggling is a big embarrasment to the countries involves and once again shows that foreign countries act to achive their own aims, wheter it’d be at another people’s expense or not.
Returning to the topic concerned, the kidnapping and piracy is anacceptable and has to be stopped. The Somaliland government (autonomous region) should be adequately equipped to protect it’s shores as foreign forces cannot always be present, then the foreign forces should patrol the remaining waters until the Somali government is capable of protecting it’s shores also. The waters need to be protected so that the locals can resume their livelihood in a reasonable manner and they won’t have to resort to these kind of actions to put bread on the table. For this to happen there needs to be a Democratically elected somali government free of foreign interference, this i believe would lead to the social and economical development that is much needed. However, i do not believe that at this day and age somalia will be alowed to rebuild itself.
These incidents have shown the strategic importance of the Gulf of Aden and surrounding waters, and i hope that the locals will recieve help as to forecome these kind of incidents. Most statements of the above, are absolutely nonsense and i cannot believe that the moderators have allowed such hatred and dislike to be shown towards Somali people, becuase that is how i perceive it.







I think that the boats that pass though troubled areas should be equipped with weapons to defend themselves