<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarbanes-Oxley&#8217;s lost promise: Why CEOs haven&#8217;t been prosecuted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/2012/07/27/sarbanes-oxleys-lost-promise-why-ceos-havent-been-prosecuted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/2012/07/27/sarbanes-oxleys-lost-promise-why-ceos-havent-been-prosecuted/</link>
	<description>On the Case</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:20:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RussRamey6</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/2012/07/27/sarbanes-oxleys-lost-promise-why-ceos-havent-been-prosecuted/#comment-1316</link>
		<dc:creator>RussRamey6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 12:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/?p=1313#comment-1316</guid>
		<description>Increased burden with predictable bureaucratic results, who would have imagined? You cannot legislate integrity. Especially by Congressional or Executive branch diktat. It&#039;s starts with the nation&#039;s leadership, which has been sorely lacking in any effort to police itslef...much less the dynamics of a free market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Increased burden with predictable bureaucratic results, who would have imagined? You cannot legislate integrity. Especially by Congressional or Executive branch diktat. It&#8217;s starts with the nation&#8217;s leadership, which has been sorely lacking in any effort to police itslef&#8230;much less the dynamics of a free market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art_In_Seattle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/2012/07/27/sarbanes-oxleys-lost-promise-why-ceos-havent-been-prosecuted/#comment-1314</link>
		<dc:creator>Art_In_Seattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/?p=1313#comment-1314</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the worst of all is that the CEO&#039;s and other top corporate officials have essentially been mandated to put in place layers upon layers of &quot;subcertification&quot; and recordkeeping below their level.  Since large-scale fraud is evidently still going on, this means the bigwigs have delegated all the dirty work to underlings, and sit in their ivory towers doing EVEN LESS to &quot;earn&quot; their giant salaries, bonuses and other compensation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the worst of all is that the CEO&#8217;s and other top corporate officials have essentially been mandated to put in place layers upon layers of &#8220;subcertification&#8221; and recordkeeping below their level.  Since large-scale fraud is evidently still going on, this means the bigwigs have delegated all the dirty work to underlings, and sit in their ivory towers doing EVEN LESS to &#8220;earn&#8221; their giant salaries, bonuses and other compensation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susette</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/2012/07/27/sarbanes-oxleys-lost-promise-why-ceos-havent-been-prosecuted/#comment-1311</link>
		<dc:creator>susette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/?p=1313#comment-1311</guid>
		<description>So it looks to me like public shareholders have no real protection against fraud. Why would anyone want to invest? Stupid!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it looks to me like public shareholders have no real protection against fraud. Why would anyone want to invest? Stupid!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuietThinker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/2012/07/27/sarbanes-oxleys-lost-promise-why-ceos-havent-been-prosecuted/#comment-1310</link>
		<dc:creator>QuietThinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/?p=1313#comment-1310</guid>
		<description>One doesn&#039;t become CEO without learning to CYA. Everyone makes mistakes, but to ascend the corporate ladder one must become adept at letting someone else take the fall. Look at Jamie Dimon letting Ina Drew and a few others take the fall for his gambling with other peoples money (OPM) and losing. Of course, these folks knew they might become the scapegoats for Dimon if things went wrong, but they themselves got tens of millions and their own chance to climb the ladder if the bets won.  The subcertification defense fits this mode of operation perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One doesn&#8217;t become CEO without learning to CYA. Everyone makes mistakes, but to ascend the corporate ladder one must become adept at letting someone else take the fall. Look at Jamie Dimon letting Ina Drew and a few others take the fall for his gambling with other peoples money (OPM) and losing. Of course, these folks knew they might become the scapegoats for Dimon if things went wrong, but they themselves got tens of millions and their own chance to climb the ladder if the bets won.  The subcertification defense fits this mode of operation perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: borisjimbo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/2012/07/27/sarbanes-oxleys-lost-promise-why-ceos-havent-been-prosecuted/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator>borisjimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/?p=1313#comment-1306</guid>
		<description>Uhhh, because A: the Repos watered down Sarbanes-Oxley to the point of toothlessness, and B: the Repo House has defunded any SEC law enforcement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhhh, because A: the Repos watered down Sarbanes-Oxley to the point of toothlessness, and B: the Repo House has defunded any SEC law enforcement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zhmileskendig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/2012/07/27/sarbanes-oxleys-lost-promise-why-ceos-havent-been-prosecuted/#comment-1305</link>
		<dc:creator>zhmileskendig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/?p=1313#comment-1305</guid>
		<description>CEO&#039;s haven&#039;t been prosecuted because CEO&#039;s enjoy immunity from prosecution, provided they employ the right lawyers/firms.  The rest is theft of valuable O2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CEO&#8217;s haven&#8217;t been prosecuted because CEO&#8217;s enjoy immunity from prosecution, provided they employ the right lawyers/firms.  The rest is theft of valuable O2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
