Delaware judge OKs forum selection clause adopted on same day as deal

September 9, 2014

Chancellor Andre Bouchard of Delaware Chancery Court struck a double blow Monday for corporations that want to restrict shareholder litigation to a single jurisdiction. In a decision upholding the validity of a bylaw requiring shareholders of First Citizens Bancshares to sue board members only in North Carolina, Bouchard ruled that Delaware corporations can designate venues other than Delaware as the exclusive forum for shareholder claims – an issue of first impression in Chancery Court. But that wasn’t all. Bouchard also rejected shareholder arguments that First Citizens’ forum selection clause can’t be enforced because it was enacted on the same day that the North Carolina bank announced its $676 million acquisition of a related First Citizens entity in South Carolina.

According to First Citizens’ lawyer Sandra Goldstein of Cravath Swaine & Moore, Bouchard’s ruling is the first to uphold a forum selection bylaw adopted in connection with a merger (and in anticipation of the inevitable shareholder suits that follow M&A deals). In an interview Tuesday, Goldstein predicted that the chancellor’s reasoning on the timing of First Citizens’ bylaw will turn out to be of broader significance than his holding on non-Delaware jurisdictions, since most forum selection clauses direct all shareholder litigation to Delaware.

Bouchard said that First Citizens shareholders hadn’t shown that the board had an improper motive in restricting litigation to a single venue just because directors adopted the clause in connection with a merger. The First Citizens clause doesn’t preclude shareholder suits, he said; it just regulates where they can be filed. “That the board adopted it on an allegedly ‘cloudy’ day when it entered into the merger agreement with FC South rather than on a ‘clear’ day is immaterial given the lack of any well-pled allegations … demonstrating any impropriety in this timing,” Bouchard wrote.

“The chancellor said it’s a completely appropriate purpose for the board to decide it only wants to be sued in one place (and) it’s not inappropriate to adopt the clause at the time of the merger,” Goldstein said. “You’re not shielding yourself from liability … You’re saying, ‘Sure, sue us, but sue us in one jurisdiction, not multiple forums.'”

Under Bouchard’s ruling, First Citizens shareholders – who are represented by Labaton Sucharow – can still try to challenge the board’s approval of the merger, but in North Carolina instead of Delaware. Goldstein said, however, that if plaintiffs try in North Carolina litigation to revive claims that First Citizens directors breached their duty by adopting the forum selection bylaw, she will argue that Bouchard has already decided that question. (Plaintiffs’ lawyer Ned Weinberger of Labaton told me that his team is still reviewing Bouchard’s opinion and considering its options.)

As you know, forum selection clauses have become incredibly popular with Delaware corporations since then chancellor Leo Strine ruled in the 2013 Boilermakers v. Chevron case that under Delaware law, such bylaws are valid on their face. The quirk of the bylaws, though, is that it’s up to judges outside of Delaware to enforce forum selection clauses mandating that shareholders can only sue in Delaware. Since Strine’s Chevron ruling, all but one of the non-Delaware judges who have ruled on dismissal motions based on forum selection clauses have refused to permit shareholder cases to move forward in their jurisdictions. The lone exception, as far as I’m aware, was a ruling last month by a state-court judge in Portland, Oregon, who denied a motion to dismiss a Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd shareholder case against the board of TriQuint SemiConductor, concluding that it would be unjust to enforce TriQuint’s forum selection bylaw because it was adopted in anticipation of exactly such a suit.

Bouchard’s new First Citizens ruling not only contradicts the TriQuint opinion’s reasoning on timing but also shows that Delaware Chancery Court is willing to defer to other jurisdictions when they’re specified in forum selection bylaws, just as non-Delaware judges have deferred to Delaware when Chancery Court is the corporation’s chosen venue. Labaton Sucharow had argued that Delaware policy is to have Chancery Court decide issues of Delaware corporate law, so a forum selection clause directing shareholder litigation elsewhere contravenes public policy. Bouchard said it does not, pointing to Strine’s citation in the Chevron ruling of previous cases that permitted Delaware partnerships and limited liability corporations to grant jurisdiction to venues other than Chancery Court.

“The analytical framework is no different” for a corporate bylaw, Goldstein said. “That was a big part of my argument.”

First Citizens chose North Carolina as the exclusive forum for shareholder litigation, she said, because that’s where the bank is headquartered and where all of its directors live. “It’s much more convenient for them to be sued there than in Delaware,” she said.

Labaton Sucharow’s client, the City of Providence, doesn’t have much time left for a breach-of-duty suit to impact the merger, which is scheduled for a vote on Sept. 16.

For more of my posts, please go to WestlawNext Practitioner Insights

Follow me on Twitter

No comments so far

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/