(Reuters) – The 2nd Circuit on Tuesday upheld a 2010 judgment of about $50 million against the French media conglomerate Vivendi. In an opinion by Judge Debra Livingston, the appeals court rejected the company’s arguments that it did not deceive a class of American Depository Shareholders with assurances in the early 2000s that Vivendi had plenty of cash on hand, despite internal communications about a looming liquidity crisis.
(Reuters) – In January 2013, an ex-client of the California personal injury lawyer Dawn Hassell posted a one-star review of Hassell’s firm on Yelp, the online consumer site. The reviewer used a pseudonym, but Hassell figured out it was Ava Bird, whom she had represented briefly. Hassell tried to get Bird to change or take down the review, which the lawyer said was factually inaccurate and defamatory. When Bird doubled down, Hassell sued her in state court in San Francisco. In July 2013, Hassell won a default judgment against Bird, who did not appear in court to defend her supposedly defamatory statements.
(Reuters) – U.S. District Judge James Donato of San Francisco is one of about three dozen federal judges in California, Texas and Massachusetts to have made a real commitment to promoting the professional development of young lawyers. According to the group Next Generation Lawyers, these judges have all issued orders, sometimes standing and sometimes case-specific, encouraging firms to permit relatively junior associates to present arguments and question witnesses. A few of the judges offer an incentive: They will entertain oral arguments on motions that would otherwise be decided on the briefs only if firms designate junior lawyers to argue.
(Note strong language in graph 8)
On Oct. 5, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on a question that has created considerable confusion in lower courts: When the government claims a corporate outsider has profited from trading illegally on inside information, what must it prove about the motive of the insider who supplied the tip?
In a way, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision Tuesday to toss a $147.8 million price-fixing judgment against two Chinese manufacturers of Vitamin C was just a reaffirmation of a principle the U.S. Supreme Court established back in 1942. But has the appeals court given foreign defendants – especially those from countries where the rule of law is suspect – a way to get out of litigation in the U.S.?
(Reuters) – The Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union envisioned disaster in an Aug. 19 amicus brief asking the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to rehear Facebook’s Computer Fraud and Abuse case against the social networking company Power Ventures. Unless the court acts en banc to clarify the boundaries of the computer fraud statute, EFF and the ACLU warned, a three-judge panel’s ruling for Facebook could “make potential criminals out of millions of ordinary Americans,” for ordinary, innocuous actions like accessing a partner’s account to pay bills or printing out an airline boarding pass for a family member.
(Reuters) – The Senate subcommittee investigating Internet sex trafficking will get to see how lawyers for the online classified ad site Backpage.com advised the company on its ad screening policies, under a ruling Friday by U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer of Washington, D.C., who is overseeing Backpage’s challenge to a Senate subpoena. Judge Collyer held that because Backpage’s lawyers did not assert attorney-client or work product privileges when they contested the subcommittee’s demand for documents and did not prepare a log of protected documents, Backpage waived the right to claim privilege.
(Reuters) – Only once in U.S. history has the federal government tried to prosecute a mainstream news organization under the Espionage Act for reporting on a classified document, according to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.
(Reuters) – Just a few years ago, the New Jersey intellectual property lawyer Ezra Sutton was on the same side as the online retailer Newegg. Newegg and Sutton’s client, the electronics company Sakar International, were among dozens of defendants sued in Texas federal district court by Adjustacam, a patent plaintiff often described as a “troll.” Newegg and Sakar refused to settle with Adjustacam, which ended up dropping its case. Sutton worked with Newegg lawyers on separate motions for attorneys’ fees from Adjustacam. When the trial judge denied the fee requests, Newegg and Sutton’s client both decided to appeal the fee ruling to the Federal U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The prominent personal injury firm Napoli Shkolnik has just surfaced in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of Excelium Management, a corporate sister of the controversial mass torts marketing company Law Firm Headquarters.