(Reuters) – Later this week, the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court are scheduled to consider a petition by Connecticut gun rights advocates who want the court to strike down the state’s restrictions on military-style semiautomatic weapons – the type of firearm used in this weekend’s horrific mass shooting at a nightclub in Florida and in the 2012 massacre of first graders at Sandy Hook elementary school.
(Reuters) – An item at Howard Bashman’s How Appealing blog caught my eye Thursday. Bashman linked to an article from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reporting that the U.S. Supreme Court will allow Milwaukee District Attorney John Chisholm and two other Wisconsin prosecutors to file a certiorari petition under seal, with only a redacted version available to the public.
On Monday, the National Football League’s Washington Redskins asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the cancellation of several of the team’s long-held trademarks for violating the Lanham Act’s non-disparagement clause. One of the team’s arguments is that if the justices plan to consider the constitutionality of the Lanham Act’s non-disparagement provision, they need to hear from the team’s lawyers, who are “best positioned to ensure that this court enjoys the full benefits of the adversarial process.”
(Reuters) – In the eight years since the publisher John Wiley & Sons first sued him for copyright infringement, almost all of the particulars of Supap Kirtsaeng’s life have changed. Back then, he was an unmarried graduate student in mathematics at the University of Southern California with a side business reselling Asian-produced versions of American textbooks. Today, after nearly a decade of litigation setbacks and advances, Kirtsaeng is back in Thailand. His textbook business is shuttered and he and his old girlfriend broke up, but he found a job as a professor, married a colleague and is finally feeling financially secure.
(Reuters) – The future of four million undocumented immigrants in the U.S. rests on the subtle and surprisingly ill-defined distinction between a policy statement and a substantive rule.
(Reuters) – It now costs, on average, at least $1 million to run a successful campaign for a seat on the state-court bench in Illinois, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Michigan and Ohio, according to an October 2015 report: “Bankrolling the Bench,” by Justice at Stake, the Brennan Center and the National Institute on Money in State Politics. In the two most expensive states for judicial campaigns, Michigan and Illinois, prospective judges spent more than $3 million, on average, in the most recent elections.
(Reuters) – With class action lawyers on both sides wondering exactly how the death of Justice Antonin Scalia will affect the U.S. Supreme Court’s appetite for class action issues, the justices will consider three notable class action certiorari petitions at their conference Friday.
(Reuters) – U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy used some quite definitive language Tuesday in his opinion for the six justices in the majority in Tyson v. Bouaphakeo, the wage-and-hour case that asked the court to resolve two big questions about class action litigation.
(Reuters) – It’s been just about a year since the U.S. Supreme Court said in Omnicare v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry that securities issuers can be liable to investors even if their misstatements are couched as opinions. But in a ruling Friday in In re Sanofi, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that despite Omnicare, issuers don’t have to tell investors about important information that may contradict the opinions they are expressing.