Opinion

Anthony De Rosa

Is Google+ a Facebook killer or another Google Wave?

By Anthony De Rosa
June 30, 2011

Google has had a series of embarrassing flops when it comes to new products. Google Wave was too complicated and didn’t solve a problem anyone had. Google Buzz never caught on with enough people to become useful. Now, they’ve set their sights directly on Facebook with Google+ and after spending a little less than a day with it, I have to admit I am intrigued.

There are a couple of things that make Google+ compelling. The first is that despite the fact it’s still in limited beta, with many folks begging for invites from friends, it feels active and alive. When you log in, it appears like the early days of Facebook, before they piled on app after app and feature after feature.

Being the new thing is an advantage, because you can focus on the features that people really want. Google+ focuses on a feed of updates, similar to the Facebook Wall, and forces people to place their contacts into “Circles” which is similar to Facebook’s “Groups” that seems to be utilized only by a small audience.

Circles allow you to focus on the things a subset of your contacts are interested in, helping to separate the signal from the noise. This is the biggest problem with not only Facebook but with Twitter as well. Power users on Twitter use “Lists” and this makes the experience of Twitter much better, especially for people who depend on Twitter for information and news.

For those who use social media to consume news, there’s a Google+ feature called “Sparks” that allows you to track Google News sources for any keyword you want and the stream can be accessed within the same space you’re following friend updates.

The largest image hosting website today is Facebook, and with apps like Instagram trying to hone in on their turf, they’re keen to get into the mobile photo sharing game as well. What really kicked up Facebook’s image hosting was picture tagging. Where Facebook has started to fall apart is the presentation of the images, which is a bit wonky. Google+ doesn’t have critical mass with image tagging yet, but they’ve got the same functionality built in, along with a much sleeker, simpler way of presenting images in a nice neat grid format. For either Google or Facebook to remain fresh, though, they’ll need to come up with their own version of what Instagram has done to capture the photo sharing zeitgeist.

The final major feature is Hangout, which lets you have a spontaneous video chat with multiple people in any particular Circle. This is something unique that Facebook doesn’t currently offer and could likely be a big draw for teenagers to socialize with friends. It could potentially be a competitor to Skype and even to WebEx if they allowed screen sharing. Tie it to Google Docs and now you have a really powerful collaboration tool.

Another important component that Google is pushing in order to separate themselves from Facebook is their “data liberation” which allows you to pack up and take your data away from Google+ should you decide to leave the service. They even made a somewhat tongue-in-cheek video to tout it, as seen here:

Privacy has always been one of the pet peeves of Facebook, and how difficult they make it to leave and take your stuff with you. Google was wise to make this a major feature of Google+.

The true test of Google+, though, will be to see if it survives given all the other digital distractions already available. Will it be the shiny new tool that becomes a fast fading fad or will it draw us away from our existing social networks of Facebook and Twitter?

Comments
8 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

As an employee of an agency that runs on Google Apps, I’d love to see (1) Google Apps accounts activated on Plus and (2) integrations between the different Google products, as you mentioned above. Love the idea of combining Docs & Hangout, and I could see great use for Sparks for an agency like ours where folks are constantly sharing out Reader finds via email.

Posted by yunapark | Report as abusive
 

AvatarScope.com has a similar idea and uses google account for login. Doesn’t collect any other personal information. Seems to have better privacy than circles. Interesting Concept.

Posted by socialfan | Report as abusive
 

I wouldn’t say Google Wave was a “problemless” solution.

What it was, and what they should have sold it as, was an online collaborative whiteboard. You can have multiple people in the conversation sharing links, photos, videos and it had versioning (a wave’s “history”) to navigate through the conversation in time. Currently, only a combination of Evernote, Dropbox, and good ole e-mail can replace it for my needs.

I’m waiting for it to mature as the open source “Wave in a Box” but it looks promising… at least for enterprise users.

Posted by ALorenzo | Report as abusive
 

praying.. it shoudn’t like google wave!

Posted by umarfarukm | Report as abusive
 

Google Wave was a failure because nobody really understood how would they use it..

Google+ is the new “Facebook”, and yes soon It will win the battle with Facebook.

More on that here: Google turning sociable and NOT nice
http://www.vectorash.ro/google-sociable- and-not-nice/

Posted by Vectorash | Report as abusive
 

It is Twitter that is vulnerable now and not so much FB.

Posted by jbgfour | Report as abusive
 

I really have to question this mad rush to “connect”.
Maybe I am not with it enough to get it, but it is sad to think
That millions of people out there are totally incapable
Of truly independent thought and action. We are
Internet and network addicts and anything we are
Addicted to will end up degrading and corrupting our overall
Culture in my humble opinion.

Posted by Anonymous | Report as abusive
 

Google+ is an epic fail.

Even Google’s own staff don’t use it, spending their social web time on Facebook and Twitter like everybody else:
http://mashable.com/2012/11/07/google-em ployees-dont-use-google-plus/

Posted by timacheson | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •