<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The fine art of the Davos snub</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/2012/01/27/the-fine-art-of-the-davos-snub/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/2012/01/27/the-fine-art-of-the-davos-snub/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 23:39:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: orbs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/2012/01/27/the-fine-art-of-the-davos-snub/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>orbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/?p=118#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Nice insight to the event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice insight to the event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melos_416BC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/2012/01/27/the-fine-art-of-the-davos-snub/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Melos_416BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 11:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/?p=118#comment-104</guid>
		<description>@sarkozyrocks - the article is NOT completely ridiculous.  There are innumerable perspectives, some of which are valid.  One potentially valid perspective sees from this article &amp; the one that preceded it (by the same writer on the same subject) that if the female spouse (significant other) of WEF luminaries are thus treated as nonpersons, the question of how much less-valued are those not in attendance (not invited) arises.  Such a view might not be the intended message of the writer, &amp; the Forum&#039;s purpose might not be to render non-attendees mere subjects of the invited men; the articles&#039; anecdotes could still imply that influence over global economic/political/academic agenda belongs to a select few, the billions of uniformed non-attendees mere docile cattle oblivious of their path or purpose.  This comment is not to accuse any party of wrongdoing; rather, it searches the status quo for the absolute meaning &amp; relative value of the uninvited-billions&#039; humanity.  One certainly hopes the invited men to attend in service to others &amp; make the world a better place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sarkozyrocks &#8211; the article is NOT completely ridiculous.  There are innumerable perspectives, some of which are valid.  One potentially valid perspective sees from this article &#038; the one that preceded it (by the same writer on the same subject) that if the female spouse (significant other) of WEF luminaries are thus treated as nonpersons, the question of how much less-valued are those not in attendance (not invited) arises.  Such a view might not be the intended message of the writer, &#038; the Forum&#8217;s purpose might not be to render non-attendees mere subjects of the invited men; the articles&#8217; anecdotes could still imply that influence over global economic/political/academic agenda belongs to a select few, the billions of uniformed non-attendees mere docile cattle oblivious of their path or purpose.  This comment is not to accuse any party of wrongdoing; rather, it searches the status quo for the absolute meaning &#038; relative value of the uninvited-billions&#8217; humanity.  One certainly hopes the invited men to attend in service to others &#038; make the world a better place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lichtenrade1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/2012/01/27/the-fine-art-of-the-davos-snub/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>lichtenrade1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 07:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/?p=118#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Life is suffering--and &#039;they&#039; , poor things, must suffer in &#039;Davos Style&#039;!  Why not just &#039;stay home&#039;? If they stay home, they will make an &#039;eco-contribution&#039; by means of the forgone pollution from the forgone- transportation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life is suffering&#8211;and &#8216;they&#8217; , poor things, must suffer in &#8216;Davos Style&#8217;!  Why not just &#8216;stay home&#8217;? If they stay home, they will make an &#8216;eco-contribution&#8217; by means of the forgone pollution from the forgone- transportation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lichtenrade1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/2012/01/27/the-fine-art-of-the-davos-snub/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>lichtenrade1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/?p=118#comment-102</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why the husbands tolerate this, nor why the wives don&#039;t prevail on their husbands to &#039;do something&#039;. But if they know what to expect, why bother to attend? The wives could organize a &#039;boycott&#039; or even a &#039;sit-in&#039; or a ---&#039;occupy Davos&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why the husbands tolerate this, nor why the wives don&#8217;t prevail on their husbands to &#8216;do something&#8217;. But if they know what to expect, why bother to attend? The wives could organize a &#8216;boycott&#8217; or even a &#8216;sit-in&#8217; or a &#8212;&#8217;occupy Davos&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gruesomedetails</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/2012/01/27/the-fine-art-of-the-davos-snub/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>gruesomedetails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/?p=118#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Ms. Shiffrin:  If it&#039;s really this miserable, and if the event organizers and participants truly are as rude and casually insulting as you describe, why do you continue to attend?  Why does your spouse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Shiffrin:  If it&#8217;s really this miserable, and if the event organizers and participants truly are as rude and casually insulting as you describe, why do you continue to attend?  Why does your spouse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarkozyrocks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/2012/01/27/the-fine-art-of-the-davos-snub/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>sarkozyrocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/?p=118#comment-100</guid>
		<description>I just had to view this piece just so I could comment...JUST A RIDICULOUS ARTICLE...WHAT IS IT DOING IN A SERIOUS PLACE LIKE REUTERS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had to view this piece just so I could comment&#8230;JUST A RIDICULOUS ARTICLE&#8230;WHAT IS IT DOING IN A SERIOUS PLACE LIKE REUTERS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarkozyrocks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/2012/01/27/the-fine-art-of-the-davos-snub/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>sarkozyrocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/?p=118#comment-99</guid>
		<description>I just had to view this piece just so I could comment...JUST A RIDICULOUS ARTICLE...WHAT IS IT DOING IN A SERIOUS PLACE LIKE REUTERS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had to view this piece just so I could comment&#8230;JUST A RIDICULOUS ARTICLE&#8230;WHAT IS IT DOING IN A SERIOUS PLACE LIKE REUTERS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
