<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Archive &#187; Michael Erman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/archive/author/michael.erman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/archive</link>
	<description>Reuters blog archive</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>MGM: For your eyes only</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=18057</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=18057#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Erman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DealZone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=18057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood movie studio MGM is considering selling itself, but will it draw more than a handful of bids? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/11/bond2.jpeg" title="bond2"><img src="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/11/bond2.jpeg" alt="bond2" align="left" width="150" height="113" class="attachment wp-att-18062 " /></a>MGM has sent out confidentiality agreements to 20 parties, as the venerable Hollywood studio test the market for a possible sale. But bankers don't think there will be more than a handful of interested parties who actually put in bids. The most serious bidders for the studio -- which dates back to the 1920's and owns the James Bond franchise -- would likely be media companies that already operate studios and want to acquire MGM's rich content library, like Time Warner, which owns the Warner Bros studio, Lions Gate or News Corp, which owns the 20th Century Fox studio.</p>
<p>People have been expecting greater consolidation among studios for some time now, as movie studios struggle to combat falling DVD sales and figure how how to make money off consumers watching their entertainment online or on mobile devices.</p>
<p>Apart from cutting costs on film production and financing, studios could potentially get greater pricing control over their content if they team up, goes the thinking. And it's not just studios that want to own content. U.S. cable operator Comcast is hoping to get access to cable programming and a movie library through its proposed acquisition of NBC Universal. </p>
<p>Still, the value of the company's movie library -- thought by many to be its crown jewel -- is up in the air. With movies on demand and digital downloading taking a bite out of DVD sales, it will be interesting to see how much MGM can pull in for that asset.</p>
<p>(Reporting by Anupreeta Das and Michael Erman)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=18057/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terra directors back on the board</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=18007</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=18007#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Erman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DealZone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Agrium]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cf industries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Terra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=18007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fertilizer maker Terra Industries rejected another bid from CF Industries Inc on Sunday. But tucked into that rejection was another piece of news that some might have missed -- Terra has reappointed the three directors that shareholders voted down last week in favor of a slate of directors backed by CF. The Terra directors that lost out to the CF slate included Chairman Henry Slack.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="tractor" href="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/11/tractor.jpg"><img class="attachment wp-att-18010 " src="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/11/tractor.jpg" alt="tractor" width="263" height="147" align="left" /></a>Fertilizer maker Terra Industries <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/americasMergersNews/idUSN2221187220091123">rejected</a> another bid from CF Industries Inc on Sunday. But tucked into that rejection was another piece of news that some might have missed -- Terra has reappointed the three directors that shareholders voted down last week in favor of a slate of directors backed by CF. The Terra directors that lost out to the CF slate included Chairman Henry Slack.</p>
<p>"The board, by unanimous vote of the directors whose terms do not expire this year, has taken steps to expand to eleven members, to be effective at that time, so that Terra's three highly-qualified and experienced independent directors, Martha O. Hesse, Dennis McGlone and Henry R. Slack, will continue to serve on the board," Terra wrote near the bottom of its Sunday night statement. "The board believes that Terra's shareholders will benefit the most by combining this experience with the new perspective of the three additions to the board."</p>
<p>The move -- although possibly dilutive to shareholder democracy -- was not necessarily unexpected.</p>
<p>CF Industries CEO Steve WIlson <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/basicMaterialsSector/idUSN1347087020091113">sent a letter</a> to Terra shareholders earlier this month saying that Terra, a Maryland company, could reappoint the directors under the state's laws.</p>
<p>"If the Terra board decided to take such action in the exercise of its fiduciary duties (without disenfranchising stockholders through increasing the size of the board beyond what would result from reappointing those directors), we would not be in a position to object," Wilson wrote in the letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=18007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ropes &#38; Gray: In the news again&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=17813</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=17813#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Erman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DealZone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Arthur Cutillo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Conniff]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[galleon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gray]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[insider trading]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=17813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law firm Ropes &#38; Gray has gone from commenting on the Galleon insider trading case to being in the case.
Just last week, Ropes &#38; Gray partner Christopher Conniff talked with the New York Times for an article about the Galleon insider trading case, discussing the statue of limitations for these cases.
Today, nine more people were arrested in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a id="aptureLink_cX77GVUdDH" style="padding: 0px 6px; float: left;" href="http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20091029/i/r793966167.jpg"><img style="border: 0px none;" title="Galleon hedge fund partner Raj Rajaratnam L is escorted by FBI" src="http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20091029/i/r793966167.jpg" alt="" width="236" height="176" /></a>Law firm Ropes &amp; Gray has gone from commenting on the Galleon insider trading case to being in the case.</p>
<p><a title="NY Times" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/30/business/30insider.html?_r=1">Just last week</a>, Ropes &amp; Gray partner <a title="Christopher Conniff" href="http://www.ropesgray.com/christopherconniff/">Christopher Conniff</a> talked with the New York Times for an article about the Galleon insider trading case, discussing the statue of limitations for these cases.</p>
<p>Today, nine more people <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5A42XF20091105">were arrested</a> in the Galleon Group insider-trading scandal, including Arthur Cutillo, a former associate at the tony, Boston-based law firm.</p>
<p>Ropes &amp; Gray said in a statement that it was deeply disappointed to learn of the insider trading allegations, and the firm was moving quickly to protect its clients.</p>
<p>Conniff will not likely be publicly discussing the Galleon case any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=17813/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agrium and CF: different definitions of engagement</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16655</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16655#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Erman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DealZone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Agrium]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CF]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Terra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview with Reuters today, Agrium CEO Mike Wilson described a phone conversation he had with CF Industries CEO Steve Wilson after 62 percent of CF's shareholders tendered their shares into Agrium's hostile bid in June. CF declined to comment on Mike Wilson's account, which follows:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Agrium CEO Mike Wilson" href="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/08/agrium.jpeg"><img class="attachment wp-att-16651 " src="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/08/agrium.jpeg" alt="Agrium CEO Mike Wilson" width="150" height="146" align="left" /></a>In an interview with Reuters today, Agrium CEO Mike Wilson described a phone conversation he had with CF Industries CEO Steve Wilson after 62 percent of CF's shareholders tendered their shares into Agrium's hostile bid in June. CF declined to comment on Mike Wilson's account, which follows:</p>
<p>"The only discussion was a brief phone call from Steve Wilson saying, 'My shareholders have asked me to engage, so I am phoning you. What do you want Mike?'"</p>
<p>"I said, 'I would like to meet with you, Steve, and talk about valuation.' And he said, 'I don't want to meet with you, there is no reason to meet.'"</p>
<p>"My response was: '62 percent of your shareholders feel differently.' And he said, 'As far as we are concerned, there is no need to meet. So this phone call is what we consider engagement."</p>
<p>CF <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSN0522409920090805">raised</a> its hostile bid for competitor Terra Industries on Wednesday, but several of CF's shareholders took issue with the Terra bid on a CF conference call.</p>
<p>(Reporting by Euan Rocha in Toronto)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16655/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agrium and CF: Different views on engagement</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/archive/2009/08/05/agrium-and-cf-different-views-on-engagement/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/archive/2009/08/05/agrium-and-cf-different-views-on-engagement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Erman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DealZone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/archive/2009/08/05/agrium-and-cf-different-views-on-engagement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A parting shot by Duquesne?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16540</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16540#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Erman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DealZone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alpha natural resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[duquesne capital management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Duquesne Capital Management, Alpha Natural Resources largest shareholder, has been working to scuttle the company's takeover of Foundation Coal for the past two weeks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="coal" href="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/07/coal.jpeg"><img class="attachment wp-att-16547 " src="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/07/coal.jpeg" alt="coal" width="205" height="150" align="left" /></a>Duquesne Capital Management, Alpha Natural Resources largest shareholder, has been working to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/americasMergersNews/idUSN2012921820090720">scuttle</a> the company's takeover of Foundation Coal for the past two weeks. In perhaps its last at shot at swaying shareholders before tomorrow morning's vote on the deal, Duquesne released its latest reason investors should oppose the deal on Thursday: the payout Alpha Chairman and CEO Michael Quillen will receive if the deal goes through.</p>
<p>Duquesne, which is run by financier Stanley Druckenmiller, has already said it believes the proposed deal will hurt Alpha shareholders financially. It believes the merged company would lower Alpha's relative exposure to more profitable metallurgical coal and international thermal coal markets.</p>
<p>Now, it <a href="http://news.google.co.uk/news/url?sa=t&amp;ct2=uk%2F0_0_s_0_0_t&amp;usg=AFQjCNHxZXEWWp3W8Pt4Pks3O9h8Z8-_vg&amp;cid=1401229939&amp;ei=0wRySvD4EcPUjAfZhKhm&amp;rt=SEARCH&amp;vm=STANDARD&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prnewswire.com%2Fcgi-bin%2Fstories.pl%3FACCT%3D104%26STORY%3D%2Fwww%2Fstory%2F07-30-2009%2F0005069316%26EDATE%3D">raises the issue</a>of the payout and the fact that Quillen , who will be staying on as chairman of the merged company, would be treated as if he had been terminated without cause.</p>
<p>Duquesne says Quillen would receive close to $15 million in shares and cash if the deal were to go through, based on sttock prices at Wednesday's close. But Alpha says that Duquesne has exaggerated the payout.</p>
<p>"<span style="font-size: x-small;">We view the Duquesne statements regarding Mr. Quillen's compensation as misleading," an Alpha   spokesman said. "The compensation arrangements are fully disclosed in the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1310243/000095012309016922/e77589dmdefm14a.htm">proxy</a> on page 78.  Duquesne seems to imply that all compensation is payable upon consummation of the merger.  In fact, as described in the proxy, the vast majority of compensation will be dependent upon Mr. Quillen's continued employment with the Company and with the Company meeting performance goals over the next three years.‬‪"</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">We'll find out tomorrow whether Duquesne has been able to gain any traction with other shareholders.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16540/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deja vu all over again for coal deal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16295</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16295#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Erman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DealZone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If this story -- two companies agree to a big coal deal, only to meet resistance from the largest shareholder of the acquiring company -- sounds familiar, that's because it is. Just last year, Cliffs Natural Resources saw its multi-billion acquisition of Alpha Natural Resources fall apart after Harbinger Capital Partners, Cliffs' largest shareholder, voiced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Coal train" href="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/07/coal2.jpeg"><img class="attachment wp-att-16300 " src="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/07/coal2.jpeg" alt="Coal train" width="168" height="236" align="left" /></a>If this story -- two companies agree to a big coal deal, only to meet resistance from the largest shareholder of the acquiring company -- sounds familiar, that's because it is. Just last year, Cliffs Natural Resources saw its multi-billion acquisition of Alpha Natural Resources <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/mnaNewsIndustryMaterialsAndUtilities/idUSN1752507920081117">fall apart</a> after Harbinger Capital Partners, Cliffs' largest shareholder, voiced its opposition to the deal.</p>
<p>Now, Alpha has <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/mnaNewsEnergy/idUSN1643155420090716">run into problems</a> in its own all-stock bid for rival Foundation Coal. Duquesne Capital Management, Alpha's largest shareholder, said in a <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1008925/000089914009001273/a5024274d.htm">filing</a> on Thursday that it has concerns about the deal, but gave no further details. Duquesne said it holds 8.31 percent of Alpha's shares.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how this plays out, but I'm sure Alpha is hoping the similarities to its previous deal end here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16295/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is oil heating up?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16205</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16205#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Erman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DealZone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Barr]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[M&amp;A]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[natural]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[takeover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Energy M&#38;A has heated up over the past few weeks, with two large deals possibly on the horizon: the sale of Repsol's Argentine unit YPF as well as Kosmos Energy's stake in the Jubilee oil field in Ghana.
If thise deals would happen, it would follow Suncor Energy's $20 billion takeover of rival Petro Canada, announced earlier [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="oil1" href="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/07/oil1.jpeg"><img class="attachment wp-att-16208 " src="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/07/oil1.jpeg" alt="oil1" width="306" height="242" align="left" /></a>Energy M&amp;A has heated up over the past few weeks, with two large deals possibly on the horizon: the sale of Repsol's Argentine <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/mnaNewsEnergy/idUSHKG27836820090710">unit</a> YPF as well as Kosmos Energy's <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/euMergersNews/idUSL854766120090708">stake</a> in the Jubilee oil field in Ghana.</p>
<p>If thise deals would happen, it would follow Suncor Energy's $20 billion takeover of rival Petro Canada, announced earlier this year.</p>
<p>So is M&amp;A in the oil sector heating up? Maybe, but insiders warn that the fluctuations in oil and gas prices could slow the flow of deals.</p>
<p>Historically,  crude oil has tended to trade between 9 to 11 times natural gas prices.  But with crude at around $60 a barrel and natural gas at around $3.35 per million british thermal units, that ratio is currently 18 times natural gas prices.</p>
<p>That suggests gas prices will go up or crude prices will go down. If oil prices drop, then assets that on the market could be pulled, and the M&amp;A market could cool fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16205/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRG CEO: Road map to double-digit increase</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16181</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16181#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Erman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DealZone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Exelon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NRG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NRG Chief Executive David Crane, talking to Reuters after his company rejected Exelon's latest hostile bid for the company, declined to specify how high Exelon would need to bid to bring NRG to the table. But he did say that his company has provided "a road map for 3 different ways they can get to double [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="NRG CEO David Crane" href="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/07/david-crane.jpeg"><img class="attachment wp-att-16184 " src="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/files/2009/07/david-crane.jpeg" alt="NRG CEO David Crane" width="109" height="150" align="left" /></a>NRG Chief Executive David Crane, talking to Reuters after his company rejected Exelon's latest hostile bid for the company, declined to specify how high Exelon would need to bid to bring NRG to the table. But he did say that his company has provided "a road map for 3 different ways they can get to double digit increases" in their bid.</p>
<p>Here are some other highlights from the interview that didn't make it into the story:</p>
<p>ON EXELON'S NEW SYNERGY ESTIMATES</p>
<p>"If you're only going to give our shareholders 18 percent of those synergies, that's not so exciting. In most combinations, the synergies (are divided) more in the 50-50 range of whatever number... They claim there are like $3.2 billion of synergies. This is not a gotcha game. I'm not saying let me sit down with you and if you only prove $3 billion, I'll say 'Aha! You're $200 million short.' Fifty percent of $3 billion is much more than 18 percent of $3.2 billion."</p>
<p>ON EXELON'S "BEST AND FINAL OFFER"</p>
<p>"What makes this deal unusual is that this is all a negotiation that is occurring in public. People making best and final offers and then coming back happens all the time in private negotiations."</p>
<p>ON EXELON PLANS TO CUT NRG JOBS</p>
<p>"We have made it clear to every employee that this is a consolidating industry, we have a fiduciary duty to NRG shareholders, and that there is not a guarantee of permanent employment. Having said that ... I definitely have concern about value creation tied with elimination of NRG jobs. People are not all fungible. The people that have created all this value at NRG and the people that are currently creating value in terms of the nuclear development and things like that are the very people that Exelon proposes to wipe out. You really can't have it both ways. You can't have full cost synergies by wiping out all of NRG's corporate capabilities, but then say you're going to take advantage of NRG's growth opportunities. The people are the ones creating the growth opportunities and Exelon has a different type of person working there than the type of person working at NRG."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16181/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UBS tries to block healthcare banker exodus to Jefferies</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=15946</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=15946#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Erman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DealZone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[injunction]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jefferies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ubs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=15946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UBS goes to court again to make sure its employment contracts are honored. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a id="aptureLink_Ja1deA6XQ3" style="padding: 0px 6px; float: left;" href="http://www.reuters.com/resources/r/?d=20081211&amp;i=7173739&amp;m=02&amp;r=2008-12-11T000813Z_01_MBH02_RTRIDSP_0_BANKING-SECRECY-SWITZERLAND&amp;t=2&amp;w=450&amp;rpc=21"><img style="border: 0px none;" title="The logo of Swiss bank UBS is pictured behind a..." src="http://www.reuters.com/resources/r/?d=20081211&amp;i=7173739&amp;m=02&amp;r=2008-12-11T000813Z_01_MBH02_RTRIDSP_0_BANKING-SECRECY-SWITZERLAND&amp;t=2&amp;w=450&amp;rpc=21" alt="" width="210" height="154" /></a>UBS received a temporary restraining order earlier this week against Jefferies and two of its former health care bankers, Benjamin Lorello and Sage Kelly, preventing them from starting work at Jefferies for 30 days. The order also prevents Jefferies from poaching other UBS bankers until July 20.</p>
<p>This is not the first time UBS has gone to court to make sure its employment contracts are honored. The Swiss bank <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/bankingFinancial/idUSL164909120080801">sought an injunction</a> against rival Vestra Wealth last year in London, after 75 of its wealth managers left for the start-up.</p>
<p>The order against Jefferies and the bankers is posted below.</p>
<p><a style="margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block; text-decoration: underline;" title="View UBS/Jefferies order on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/16819414/UBSJefferies-order">UBS/Jefferies order</a> <object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="100%" height="500" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="id" value="doc_425266445014551" /><param name="name" value="doc_425266445014551" /><param name="align" value="middle" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="play" value="true" /><param name="loop" value="true" /><param name="scale" value="showall" /><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><param name="devicefont" value="false" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="menu" value="true" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="salign" /><param name="src" value="http://d.scribd.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=16819414&amp;access_key=key-1d5wg5y5ie5o8ymswf81&amp;page=1&amp;version=1&amp;viewMode=" /><embed id="doc_425266445014551" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="100%" height="500" src="http://d.scribd.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=16819414&amp;access_key=key-1d5wg5y5ie5o8ymswf81&amp;page=1&amp;version=1&amp;viewMode=" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" menu="true" bgcolor="#ffffff" devicefont="false" wmode="opaque" scale="showall" loop="true" play="true" quality="high" align="middle" name="doc_425266445014551"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=15946/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
