from The Great Debate:

Fed tightening will help stem inequality

By Alexander Friedman
May 12, 2014

The Federal Reserve Building is reflected on a car in Washington September 16, 2008. REUTERS/Jim Young

from Edward Hadas:

Shhh – don’t talk about higher taxes

By Edward Hadas
May 7, 2014

By Edward Hadas

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

from Edward Hadas:

Wealth buys less lifestyle, more power

By Edward Hadas
April 2, 2014

Many serious people think economic inequality in the United States and other developed economies should be a hot political topic. But the general public hardly cares. There is a bad reason behind lack of public interest.

from The Great Debate:

How do we measure whether Americans are better off than in the past?

By Allison Schrager
January 16, 2014

Are you better off than you were twenty years ago? Probably not relative to very rich people today, but what about relative to you, or to someone your age and position twenty years ago? Income inequality has been called the defining issue of our time. Powerful leaders, from President Obama to Pope Francis, have cited it as evidence that the unfettered capitalism that has enriched the wealthy hasn’t been shared. Of course, there’s a difference between the gains in income being shared evenly, shared a little, or making everyone else poorer. In many ways the average American is much better off than he used to be; in other ways he’s worse off.  But even if we focus on what’s gotten better, we may still need to worry about the future.

from Edward Hadas:

China’s wisdom on GDP growth

By Edward Hadas
July 3, 2013

"We should no longer evaluate the performance of leaders simply by GDP growth. Instead, we should look at welfare improvement, social development and environmental indicators." That is a fine piece of wisdom from Xi Jinping, China's president. Leaders of developed economies can learn from it.

from The Great Debate:

Examine inequality’s causes before prescribing solutions

By Nick Gillespie
December 19, 2012

Fear and loathing of income inequality is both totally understandable and ultimately misplaced.

from The Great Debate:

Government can reduce inequality, but chooses not to

By Timothy Noah
December 18, 2012

This essay is a response to the Reuters special report The Unequal State of America.

from The Great Debate:

Everything you know about inequality is wrong

By Kevin Pollari
October 19, 2012

This is the fourth response to an excerpt from Chrystia Freeland’s Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else, published this week by Penguin Press. The first response can be read here, the second here, and the third here

from The Great Debate:

Has rising inequality actually hurt anyone?

By Scott Winship
October 18, 2012

The incomes of the top 1 percent -- and especially of the top one-half of the top 1 percent -- have skyrocketed over the past 30 years. The latest estimates from the Congressional Budget Office show that the inflation-adjusted average income of the top 1 percent of households was $340,000 in 1979 but $1.4 million in 2007, quadrupling over less than three decades. Popular discussion of the top 1 percent tends to highlight how different, say, Mitt Romney and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg are from typical Americans. In reality there is as great a disparity between Zuckerberg’s and Romney’s income as between Romney’s and yours. Disparities in income are so dramatic it is difficult to comprehend them.

from The Great Debate:

The causes and consequences of plutocracy

By Ryan Avent
October 17, 2012

This is the second response to an excerpt from Chrystia Freeland’s Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else, published this week by Penguin Press. The first response can be read here.