from Felix Salmon:

A smarter way of subsidizing parenthood

By Felix Salmon
April 3, 2014

Ben Walsh has a great roundup of the discussion surrounding Reihan Salam’s proposal that we institute a surtax on the childless. At a societal level, we want population growth — more children — but when it comes to individual households like my own, there are often compelling reasons to have few or no children at all. As countries get richer, their birth rates decline, with nasty demographic consequences.

from Felix Salmon:

Janet Yellen didn’t gaffe

By Felix Salmon
March 21, 2014

yellen.png

It’s become received opinion that Janet Yellen made a “rookie gaffe” in her first press conference as Fed chair, thereby “rattling markets”. She didn’t.

from Felix Salmon:

Annals of captured regulators, NY Fed edition

By Felix Salmon
March 20, 2014

Peter Eavis has a worrying story today: the chairman of the New York Fed, William Dudley, has effectively, behind the scenes, managed to delay the implementation of an important new piece of bank regulation.

from Felix Salmon:

The bank tax rises from the dead

By Felix Salmon
February 26, 2014

Back in January 2010, Barack Obama — flanked by Tim Geithner, Larry Summers, and Peter Orszag — unveiled a new tax on big banks, or a “financial crisis responsibility fee”, as he liked to call it. Of course, this being Washington, the initiative never got off the ground, and was largely forgotten — until now:

from Felix Salmon:

Felix Salmon smackdown watch, pensions edition

By Felix Salmon
February 23, 2014

Many thanks to John Arnold for responding to my post about how he (and his foundation) should approach pension reform. We agree on many things, it turns out; but there's one big area where we disagree, which is encapsulated most cleanly in the question of what exactly is going on in San Jose mayor Chuck Reed's Pension Reform Act. I characterized Reed's ballot initiative as "allowing governments to default on their pension obligations", and "an attempt to renege on governments’ existing pension obligations". Arnold says I'm entirely wrong about that:

from Felix Salmon:

Pension politics

By Felix Salmon
February 13, 2014

David Sirota has a very important scoop today: the PBS series “Pension Peril” has secretly* been funded by John Arnold, a billionaire powerbroker with an aggressively anti-pensions political agenda. This looks very bad for PBS — but it’s also bad for Arnold, who generally gets glowing press, and who would seem to have no good reason to have insisted on secrecy when writing the $3.5 million check that made the series possible.

from Felix Salmon:

Puerto Rico needs to prepare for its default

By Felix Salmon
February 5, 2014

Ryan McCarthy has a good round-up of Puerto Rico’s debt problems, which have now been exacerbated by S&P downgrading the island’s bonds to junk status. (Moody’s and Fitch are certain to do so as well, in short order.) For a good one-stop overview of most of the big issues, I can recommend Nuveen Asset Management’s note, which includes this chart:

from Felix Salmon:

Barack Obama vs zombies

By Felix Salmon
October 16, 2013

There's a strain of triumphalism coursing through the blogosphere today, on the grounds that the bonkers wing of the Republican party is going to have achieved exactly none of its own goals, while inflicting upon itself a massive black eye. The markets are feeling vindicated too: over the past week of DC craziness, the stock market has risen, pretty steadily, a total of about 2.5%. As a trading strategy, "tune out all news from inside the Beltway" seems to have worked very well -- it's a complete vindication of the Nassim Taleb idea that investors shouldn't read the newspaper. On top of that, the potential debt default was by its nature almost impossible to trade: outside a few obscure instruments like US CDS, it's very difficult to make money from a trade betting that tails are going to get fatter, for a short while.

from Felix Salmon:

The default has already begun

By Felix Salmon
October 14, 2013

The big question in Washington this week is whether, in the words of the NYT, we're going to see "a legislative failure and an economic catastrophe that could ripple through financial markets, foreign capitals, corporate boardrooms, state budget offices and the bank accounts of everyday investors". In this conception -- and I have subscribed to it just as much as anybody else -- the sequester is bad, the shutdown is worse, and the default associated with hitting the debt ceiling is so catastrophic as to be unthinkable.