Archive

from India Insight:

It’s time India bites the diesel bullet

"81 rupees?" asked an astonished TV anchor when an irate Bengaluru-based consumer called in after the recent 7.5-rupee hike in petrol prices. Perhaps cars that run on milk are now needed, the anchor suggested -- when the caller said the dairy product costs around 30 rupees a litre.

While milk-powered automobiles might be a distant dream, the reality remains that those relying on petrol vehicles will now need to do their budgeting again. If a falling rupee and high inflation were not enough, this steepest-ever rise in petrol prices will surely pinch.

The fact remains that petrol prices were decontrolled way back in June 2010. That move gave oil marketing companies (OMCs) freedom to revise prices and also gave the government some saving grace as ministers can now easily say that petrol prices are market driven.

Though the government cannot be blamed for this hike on paper, they do manage to influence OMC decisions. That is indicated by the fact that this hike comes after state elections and a day after the parliament’s budget session got over.

However, it is tough to understand why the government would allow OMCs to raise petrol prices, given the move will not help improve the fiscal situation as the government doesn’t subsidise petrol. It is the subsidy burden of other fuels that strains the government’s finances.

As Hitendra Dave, global markets head at HSBC in Mumbai explained -- This (the petrol price hike) has zero fiscal impact. This will only help oil marketing companies.

What was perhaps more needed at this stage was a revision or decontrol of other fuel prices, which could help boost the already weak economic sentiment.

from Expert Zone:

Should the RBI delay a rate cut?

(The views expressed in this column are the author's own and do not represent those of Reuters)

With the return of inflation, there are doubts whether the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) will go in for the next cut in repo rate any time soon. In April, inflation was up at 7.2 percent, 2 percent more than in March.

What is more disturbing -- the food component of inflation was in double digits. With the extreme sensitivity of the RBI to inflation, it is difficult to expect it to take kindly to the fall in industrial production and cut the repo rate.

Food inflation, however, is not the parameter for the RBI to go by because it is outside the impact area of RBI policy. No one buys food by borrowing from the bank and, whatever the interest rate, the expenditure on food will not be reduced and food inflation will not ease.

It is more relevant for the RBI to look at the core inflation or principally, inflation in the industrial sector. No doubt, prices of industrial products have also been rising but at a much slower rate. In April, prices of industrial products were up 1 percent over prices in March. Inflation in the industrial sector was 5.1 percent over the year, well within the RBI’s tolerance limits.

Industry is the major sector that responds to RBI policy. An increase in the interest rate will most certainly crunch investment and a cut, stimulate it. In March, for instance, investment was down 21 percent   because 142 projects involving an investment of 1,553 billion rupees were shelved, being rendered unviable due to the high rate of interest and absence of market for equity.

But the RBI’s single target is inflation. Even on April 17, the cut in repo rate was done quite reluctantly though it was a good beginning. It is critical that it has to be carried forward before it can regenerate investment and revive growth. The RBI had done that in 2008 when the economy had slowed down. The repo rate was 9 percent in 2008 and the RBI cut the rate by 1 percent in October, in spite of inflation raging at 12 percent. That cut was followed by another in November and once again in December. In just three months, the repo was down 2.5 percent from 9 to 6.5 percent, with inflation dropping to 5 percent.

from Global Investing:

Three snapshots for Thursday

The Bundesbank is preparing to stomach higher German inflation than it likes, above the European Central Bank's target level, because of the euro zone crisis, a source at the central bank said on Thursday.

Although the Bundesbank still wants stable prices across the euro zone, its latest comments show the bank recognises that upward pressure on German wage costs and property prices suggest its inflation is likely to rise above the bloc's average.

As this chart shows, historically the Bundesbank was quick to react to any signs of inflation:

The Bank of England voted on Thursday not to give the struggling economy another injection of cash as concerns over stubbornly high inflation outweighed the risk of a prolonged recession.

The number of Americans submitting new applications for jobless benefits edged down last week, easing concerns the labor market was deteriorating after April's weak employment growth.

from Global Investing:

South African bond rush

It's been a great year so far for South African bonds. But can it get better?

Ever since Citi announced on April 16 that South African government bonds would join its World Government Bond Index (WGBI),  almost 20 billion rand (over $2.5 billion ) in foreign cash has flooded to the local debt markets in Johannesburg, bringing year-to-date inflows to over 37 billion rand. Last year's total was 48 billion. Michael Grobler, bond analyst at Johannesburg-based brokerage Afrifocus Securities predicts total 2012 inflows at over 60 billion rand, surpassing the previous 56 billion rand record set in 2o1o:

The assumption..is based on the fact that South Africa will have a much larger and diversified investor base following inclusion in the WGBI expanding beyond the EM debt asset class

Currently South African bonds are restricted to emerging local bond indices. The most-widely used, JPMorgan's GBI-EM, has less than $200 billion benchmarked to it and South Africa's weighting is 10 percent. But the WGBI is a different matter altogether -- around $2 trillion is estimated to track this index which currently includes just 22 countries, only three of them emerging markets.  An expected 0.44 percent weighting for South Africa implies inflows of  $5-$9 billion, analysts estimate.

Some of that cash has already come. How much more could roll in this year? Optimists point to Mexico -- foreign ownership of the local debt market there rose to 31 percent from 24 percent over 2010, the year the country joined the WGBI, with $11 billion flowing in. But the picture in South Africa is in fact not that rosy. Inflows will undoubtedly pick up, benefiting both bonds and the rand but many reckon positioning in South African bonds is already pretty crowded --  about a third of the market is in foreign hands already, analysts at Morgan Stanley reckon. Worse, the country faces a possible credit ratings downgrade this year (all three rating agencies have cut its ratings outlook to negative in recent months).

Kieran Curtis, a fund manager at Aviva Investors upped his holdings of South African local bonds after the WGBI news but is reluctant to go overweight,  betting the market will benefit less than Mexico did two years ago. He cites two reasons -- first South Africa's budget deficit has been creeping higher and it follows that debt issuance will too. Second, the external backdrop is less supportive today than two years ago when the Fed was in full money-printing mode:

I wouldnt say I detect a very strong commitment in South Africa to restoring the budget to balance and those debt numbers can rise quickly when you have a 5-6 percent deficit. Also Mexico's inclusion came at a time when U.S. Treasury yields were falling fairly quickly but now, with Treasury yields rising we may not get the same support for South Africa.

from MacroScope:

Jobs or inflation — Is the Fed distracted?

The Federal Reserve doesn’t get much love from Washington these days but it did receive a rare bit of political backing on Wednesday as Democrats defended its role in promoting full employment as well as stable prices.

The U.S. central bank has been the target of criticism from members of both political parties as a result of bank bailouts and hands-off rule-enforcement that let predatory and unsound lending practices go unchecked, among other shortfalls.

But discussing legislation narrowing the Fed’s mandate to a single-minded focus on price stability, Democrats questioned the need to drop the full employment side of the dual mandate.

“Is it a problem?” asked Minnesotan Keith Ellison. “To the degree that we have problems with monetary policy, is the dual mandate the cause?”

Ellison said that far from distracting the Fed, the lofty 8.1 percent unemployment rate should get greater attention. “This is a national disgrace,” he said.

Ron Paul, a presidential candidate who chairs a subcommittee on domestic monetary policy, held a hearing to discuss several pieces of legislation changing the Fed’s mandate. Two of these would limit the Fed’s focus to price stability.

With partisan divisions and other priorities, Congress is unlikely to make any changes to the Fed’s mandate this year. But the effort could gain momentum if Republicans control both houses of Congress after November.

from Global Investing:

Poland, the lonely inflation targeter

Is the National Bank of Poland (NBP) the last inflation-targeting central bank still standing?

The bank shocked many today with a quarter point rate rise, naming stubbornly high inflation as the reason, and signalling that more tightening is on its way. The NBP has sounded hawkish in recent weeks but few had actually expected it to carry through its threat to raise rates. Economic indicators of late have been far from cheerful -- just hours after the rate rise, data showed Polish car production slumped 30 percent in April from year-ago levels. PMI numbers last week pointed to further deterioration ahead for manufacturing. And sitting as it does on the euro zone's doorstep, Poland will be far more vulnerable than Brazil or Russia to any new setback in Greece. Its action therefore deserves praise, says Benoit Anne, head of emerging markets strategy at Societe Generale.

(Poland's central bank) is one of the last orthodox inflation-targeting central banks in the global emerging market central bank universe. They are taking action because they are seeing inflation creeping up and have decided to be proactive.

The rate rise  is especially notable given many central banks in developing countries appear effectively to have surrendered their inflation-fighting mandate. Nowhere is the push for lower interest rates more pronounced than in Brazil where the government last week announced plans to scrap fixed-rate savings deposits in a move that is seen paving the way for more agressive rate cuts. Clearly there is tolerance here for higher inflation, which will still end 2012 well above target.

But many analysts such as Manik Narain at UBS consider Poland's decision a high-risk one given the growth issues. Narain sees it possibly motivated by the need to signal Poland will not welcome further currency weakness (the zloty like most emerging currencies has shed much of its early-2012 gain) Therefore a prolonged monetary tightening cycle is unlikely, he says. Indeed many reckon the NBP may find itself, like the European Central Bank last year, reversing an ill-considered rate rise. Analysts at Capital Economics write:

If we are right in expecting growth and inflation to slow by more than most expect over the second half of this year then this may well be the NBP’s “ECB moment”. Recall that having hiked rates twice in the first half of 2011, the ECB was forced to start loosening policy once again by November as the economy weakened. In Poland’s case, we think there is a good chance that today’s rate hike will be reversed by the end of the year.

from Breakingviews:

Let Germany inflate while others deflate

By Pierre Briançon

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

The Bundesbank keeps raising concerns about a possible surge of inflation in the euro zone. But the fears are premature at best. The European Central Bank hasn’t failed on that front. While the current 2.7 percent inflation rate is above the ECB’s official goal of “below but close to 2 percent”, it expects to be back on target in early 2013. The question is whether sticking to that stubborn 2 percent goal makes sense as recession threatens.

The ECB is keeping its key interest rate at 1 percent, much higher than the near-zero levels in the United States and UK. The economies’ near-term prospects don’t justify the euro premium. The euro zone’s gross domestic product will shrink by 0.3 percent this year, according to the latest International Monetary Fund forecast, compared to 2.1 percent growth in the United States and 0.8 percent in the UK.

The monetary purists at the Bundesbank fear that lower euro rates - or even too many months at the current level - will fuel inflation in Germany. It’s possible, even though in the year ended in March, prices rose by 0.4 percentage points less in Germany than in the euro zone as a whole. Faster growth in Europe’s largest economy could reverse the gap this year, especially if German workers succeed in their demands for higher pay after a decade of strict wage discipline.

Yet higher German inflation shouldn’t be feared, but hoped for. It would make looser monetary policy more effective where help is most needed. Prices are rising slower than the average in troubled euro countries like Greece, Spain or Ireland. Higher inflation in Germany would help them regain some competitiveness. And it would help rebalance the euro zone economy, after a decade when German exporters gained market share throughout the region.

Mario Draghi, the ECB’s president, is unlikely to say so, but in an ideal world he would: inflation in the euro zone is not a threat. And more of it in Germany could be good for Europe.

from Global Investing:

Three snapshots for Thursday

The European Central Bank kept interest rates on hold on Thursday.  President Mario Draghi urged euro zone governments to agree a growth strategy to go hand in hand with fiscal discipline, but as thousands of Spaniards protested in the streets he gave no sign the bank would do more to address people's fears about the economy

The divergence between Euro zone countries is starting to impact analyst estimates for earnings. As this chart shows earnings forecasts for Spain and Portugal are seeing more downgrades than Germany or France.

The inflation rate in Turkey rose to 11.1% in April, putting pressure on the central bank to raise interest rates:

from MacroScope:

Bernanke: U.S. is not Japan, and I have not changed my mind

Of all the questions Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was asked during his press conference on Wednesday, one appeared to pique his interest in particular: Was he being less aggressive as central bank chairman than the advice he dished out to Japan as an academic in the 1990s would prescribe?

It was the second half of the question asked by Binyamin Applebaum and yet the chairman was eager to get right to it: “Let me tackle that second part first,” he began.

Applebaum may have been channeling the Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman, a Princeton colleague of Bernanke’s and critic of Fed policy, who recently argued the Fed chief was being inconsistent and overly cautious.

Bernanke argued that the Fed has done a lot already to support growth and bring down unemployment. Actively aiming for higher inflation with additional use of unconventional tools would risk the central bank’s long-term credibility. Here is his answer in full:

So there’s this view circulating that the views I expressed about 15 years ago on the Bank of Japan are somehow inconsistent with our current policies. That is absolutely incorrect. My views and our policies today are completely consistent with the views that I held at that time.

I made two points at that time to the Bank of Japan. The first was that I believe that a determined central bank could and should work to eliminate deflation – that is, falling prices. The second point that I made was that when short-term interest rates hit zero, the tools of a central bank are no longer – are not exhausted. There are still other things that the central bank can do to create additional accommodation.

Now, looking at the current situation in the United States, we are not in deflation. When deflation became a significant risk in late 2010, or at least a modest risk in late 2010, we used additional balance sheet tools to help return inflation close to the 2 percent target. Likewise, we have been aggressive and creative in using non-federal-funds-rate-centered tools to achieve additional accommodation for the U.S. economy.

So the very critical difference between the Japanese situation 15 years ago and the U.S. situation today is that Japan was in deflation. And, clearly, when you’re in deflation, and in recession, then both sides of your mandate, so to speak, are demanding additional accommodation. In this case, we are not in deflation. We have an inflation rate that’s close to our objective.

Now, why don’t we do more? Well, first I would again reiterate that we are doing a great deal. The policy is extraordinarily accommodative. We – and I won’t go through the list again, but you know all the things that we have done to try to provide support to the economy. I guess the question is, does it make sense to actively seek a higher inflation rate in order to achieve a slightly increased reduction – a slightly increased pace of reduction in the unemployment rate?

The view of the committee is that that would be very reckless. We have – we, the Federal Reserve, have spent 30 years building up credibility for low and stable inflation, which has proved extremely valuable in that we’ve been able to take strong accommodative actions in the last four, five years to support the economy without leading to an unanchoring of inflation expectations or a destabilization of inflation. To risk that asset for what I think would be quite tentative and perhaps doubtful gains on the real side would be, I think, an unwise thing to do.

from MacroScope:

Resolving Shirakawa’s conundrum

The governor of the Bank of Japan, Masaaki Shirakawa, says he is confounded by the still very low level of Japanese government bond yields given the country’s elevated debt to GDP ratio of over 200 percent. Speaking on an IMF panel over the weekend, he offered a rather unintuitive explanation for the phenomenon:

It seems difficult to explain the case of Japan in light of conventional wisdom. One frequently offered explanation is that the ample domestic savings in Japan have absorbed the issuance of JGBs and the share of JGBs held by foreign investors is very small. But a more fundamental explanation is that the stability in the current bond yields reflects market participants’ expectations that fiscal soundness will be restored through structural reforms imposed in the economic and fiscal areas.

Most economists think Japanese yields are low because of continued expectations for deflation and weak economic growth. But for Shirakawa, it seems, it is public confidence in future fiscal restraint that is keeping bond yields low. Except he then contradicts this point by saying weak confidence in future fiscal reforms is also simultaneously undermining consumer spending:

At the moment, such expectations are not firmly backed by concrete reform plans. The public therefore restrains spending on concerns over future fiscal developments. This constitutes one factor behind sluggish economic growth and mild deflation. If this is indeed the case, the experience of Japan indicates a possibility that a cumulative increase in government debt combined with weak economic growth expectations might generate deflationary pressures.

Not so, argues Ugo Panizza, head of debt and finance analysis at the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. He and co-author Andrea Presbitero find no causal link between high debt levels and weak economic growth.

Christopher Sims, a Nobel-winning economist and Princeton professor also on the panel with Shirakawa, had a much simpler explanation for why Japanese yields are low while Europe’s face steady upward pressure even though both economies are struggling with soft growth: