Reuters blog archive
from India Insight:
(Any opinions expressed here are those of the author, and not necessarily of Thomson Reuters)
The most unfortunate aspect of the censorship controversy over Kamal Haasan's new movie "Vishwaroopam," which came out on Thursday, is that it is happening in Tamil Nadu. India's southernmost state has a history of using cinema as a tool of political dissent and expression, particularly regarding the Dravidian movement, but that spirit seems to have vanished with the decision to release a truncated version of the film after Islamic groups said certain scenes offended them.
First, a recap: "Vishwaroopam" (background on that name here) is a spy thriller about a Muslim man living in New York, masquerading as a Hindu. He must thwart a plot by a group of Afghans to blow up the city. The film came out on Jan. 25 except in Tamil Nadu, where Muslim groups objected to the portrayal of some characters as bearded, wild-eyed "terrorists." The state banned the film under India's criminal code, and chief minister and former actress Jayalalithaa said she could not guarantee police protection at cinemas that showed the movie. She also said that the ban was a move to preserve "law and order." Haasan agreed to remove seven scenes to mollify the groups.
The history of Tamil Nadu's cinema is intertwined with its politics. The social, political and religious ideology that arose there over the years often was the work of prominent figures in cinema who gravitated toward politics. The influence of their politics was wrapped up in the films that they made. Many of these people dominate politics in the state today, but their stance on creative freedom contradicts their pioneering work in promoting progressive thought.