Reuters blog archive
from India Insight:
Modern Indian artists have celebrated the body on the canvas for more than a hundred years. Amrita Sher-Gil, known as India's Frida Kahlo, may have been the earliest Indian artist in modern times to paint nudes, including a self-portrait. The Delhi Art Gallery’s latest show – "The Naked and the Nude" – presents a retrospective journey of the representation of the body in modern Indian art, mostly from the dawn of the 20th century to the present.
It's also generating anger among groups that object to art involving nudes. When I visited the gallery, the front office operator received a call from a regional political group, demanding that the show be closed. That is not an option, said Kishore Singh, project editor and head of exhibition and publication at the Delhi Art Gallery. "We cannot and will not take seriously people’s right to be offended, and demand that we take something down."
On Monday, the show was briefly shut down after women from the right-wing group Vishwa Hindu Parishad (World Hindu Council) protested at the venue. Meanwhile, gallery owner Ashish Anand said about 200 to 300 people plan to protest on Wednesday. (A similar fracas just happened in Bangalore.)
"We have nothing against them protesting as long as it is non-violent, non-threatening," he said. "We’re just showing Indian modern art that has been explored by the great masters … over the last hundred years. If it's something that was made 50 or 100 years ago, (and) it wasn't objectionable (at) that time, why are they objecting now?"
from UK News:
Trafalgar Square's empty fourth plinth has been used in recent years to showcase the work of modern artists.
Marc Quinn's nude statue of Alison Lapper pregnant and a coloured glass creation called Model for a Hotel 2007 by German artist Thomas Schutte have been two recent examples. Some people love them, others hate them.