Jeb Bush is skeptical about U.S.-led negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program.
With only days to go before the original July 20 deadline for negotiations over the future Iran's nuclear program, there is scant sign that a breakthrough is imminent. The reason is simple: Iranian leaders’ refusal to move from what a senior Obama administration official recently described as "unworkable and inadequate positions that would not in fact assure that their program is exclusively peaceful."
Iran’s past nuclear efforts are among the many thorny issues in the continuing Iran nuclear talks. But focusing on the past is a mistake. Instead of insisting on knowing all about what Iran’s nuclear program looked like 10 years ago, the United States and its allies should focus on preventing Tehran from building a nuclear weapon in the future.
Last weekend, after years of failed negotiations, the “P5+1” nations -- the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China) plus Germany -- finally appeared to be on the verge of a deal with Iran regarding curbs on its nuclear program.
Bernd Debusmann is a Reuters columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
In the long-running Western debate over what to do about Iran's nuclear program, fresh language has been as rare as fresh ideas. But here's a novel phrase worth noting: "Striking Iranian nuclear sites is like mowing the grass." How so?
Everyone has their own way of broaching subjects they don't like.
Iran has decided the best prelude to upcoming talks with Western powers that are inevitably going to end up in a finger-pointing session over Tehran's nuclear program, is to test fire a bunch of missiles.