Reuters blog archive
from The Great Debate:
The day after his 2009 inauguration, President Barack Obama committed to “creating an unprecedented level of openness in government.”
He vowed to build on “transparency [that] promotes accountability by providing the public with information about what the government is doing,” “participation [that] allows members of the public to contribute ideas and expertise,” and “collaboration [that] actively engages Americans in the work of their government.”
Despite these promises, and despite longstanding requirements of administrative law, the Obama administration is making significant regulatory decisions behind closed doors -- without transparency or public involvement. Yet these new regulations could have enormous impact on Americans for generations to come.
The president’s ambitious regulatory agenda to address climate change relies on a “social cost of carbon” (SCC) -- an estimate of the monetary value of eliminating one ton of CO2 emissions -- to calculate the benefits used to justify a host of regulatory actions and government subsidies. These include renewable fuel and mileage mandates for our cars, water limits for washing machines and dishwashers and less visible rules that will likely affect the price of food and electricity.