Reuters blog archive
By Una Galani
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.
CITIC Pacific is going slow on reform with its $5.1 billion placing. The Chinese group’s Hong Kong subsidiary will sell new shares to 15 investors as part of a union with its state-owned conglomerate parent. The placing allows CITIC Pacific to keep its stock market listing. Yet most of the money is coming from buyers also backed by the Chinese government. A deeper overhaul of state firms looks a way off.
CITIC Pacific’s mainland parent plans to swap assets worth $37 billion – ranging from finance to a football club – for shares in the Hong Kong-listed group. This would leave existing independent shareholders in CITIC Pacific with just 6.2 percent of the enlarged share capital – well below the minimum 15 percent required by Hong Kong rules. The placing lifts the free float to 18 percent.
Yet it’s questionable just how independent the new shareholders are. State-owned entities including China’s National Social Security Fund, the SAFE foreign exchange fund, and the country’s top commercial banks have directly and through subsidiaries agreed to buy more than 80 percent of the new shares. Strip out Chinese government cash and the enlarged group’s free float shrinks to less than 9 percent.
from Global Investing:
Investors in emerging markets are facing a tough choice. Should one buy cheap shares in the hope that poor corporate governance and profitability will improve some day? Or is it better to close one's eyes and buy into expensively valued companies that sell mobile telephones, holidays and handbags -- all the things high-spending emerging market consumers hanker after?
At the moment, investors are plumping for the latter, growth-at-any price investment strategy. Result: a lopsided emerging equity index in which consumer discretionary shares are up more than 5 percent this year, energy shares have lost 7 percent while MSCI's benchmark emerging equity index is down 3 percent.
By John Foley
(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own)
China’s elaborate money-go-round starts and ends with its cash-hoarding state-owned enterprises. So a plan to make them pay bigger dividends sounds promising. Still, if the goal is to return cash to the people, there is a long way to go.
By John Foley
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
State-owned enterprises are China’s economic version of the giant vampire squid. The 20,253 industrial companies owned and controlled by the government soak up capital, and pay little out. Their costs are low and their bosses powerful. If China’s new leaders are serious about making households wealthy, they need to make these industrial giants behave more like normal companies.
from Global Investing:
Interesting to see that Poland wants to squeeze out more income from its state-owned enterprise (SOE) sector in the face of slowing economic growth and financing pressures.
Warsaw wants to double next year's dividends from stakes in firms ranging from copper mines to utility providers to banks.
from Financial Regulatory Forum:
By Eadie Chen and Chen Aizhu
BEIJING, Aug 31 (Reuters) - A report that Chinese state-owned companies will be allowed to walk away from loss-making commodity derivative trades provoked anger and dismay among investment bankers on Monday as they feared it may set a damaging precedent.
The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, the regulator and nominal shareholder for state-owned enterprises (SOEs), told six foreign banks that SOEs reserved the right to default on contracts, Caijing magazine quoted an unnamed industry source as saying in an article published on Saturday.