Reuters Blogs

Ask…

Share your views on hot topics

September 11th, 2007

The media and the McCanns

Posted by: Guy Dresser
Tags: Ask

mccanns.jpgWhen Madeleine McCann disappeared in Portugal on the evening of May 3, her parents pursued every possible opportunity to raise public awareness. Kate and Gerry McCann proved to be highly savvy media operators as they pulled out all the stops and achieved unprecedented worldwide publicity for their daughter.

But as the days turned to weeks and months with few outward signs of progress in the police investigation, the initially sympathetic hearing that the McCanns received in the media waned. Rumours began and persisted, countered initially by claims from the McCanns supporters, that the Portuguese didnt like this constant reminder that a little girl had disappeared in their midst.

There was even criticism that the McCanns appeared to revel in all the publicity that theyd generated. And, finally there were leaks, apparently from the police but, actually, very little of it from named sources, that evidence pointed to the parents themselves being somehow complicit in Madeleines disappearance.

Now, with both parents named as official suspects in the case, the newspapers and news bulletins are full of details as to the supposed nature of the supposed evidence against them, lots of it from apparently unnamed sources.

The McCanns, meanwhile, are back in the UK but besieged by a media army outside the front door of their Leicestershire home while they await developments.

Whatever hopes the McCanns might have had for some privacy for their two other children now look rather forlorn, dashed at least in part by the ongoing tide of speculation in the press as to whether UK social services might step in, whatever that means.

However this desperate case turns out, the McCann family will now never shake off the media interest in their lives. Even if Madeleine were to turn up fit and well, a prurient interest in her and her family would doubtless persist into her adulthood. And if she is never seen again, her parents will always have the stain of responsibility on their names, irrespective of whether any of the evidence discovered proves relevant or not.

We all accept that the media has a responsibility to report the goings on in this case. But is there a line that has been crossed? While the media displayed its best traits in publicising Madeleine McCanns disappearance, is it now showing a familiar dark side? Or is all this coverage, as some would say, no more than completely reasonable in the circumstances?

39 comments so far

UK social services might step in, whatever that means.

- Posted by colin

As you stated..”her parents pursued every possible opportunity to raise public awareness.”
They wanted the media every step of the way. Now they got it…Pete

- Posted by Peter Tripodi

It is intrusive indeed, seems like it´s the most important and biggest news these days. Well, it is interesting and shocking and everyone would like to know what exacly happened but I´m getting tired and bored of it, it´s on every tv channel, every news paper, etc.
Media should give it a break for a while.

Rgds

Lucia

- Posted by Lucia Patakyova

as a father of two children,it would be heartless not to feel empathy with the mcanns.we shouldn’t however be blinded to the fact that many people have manipulated the media in the past only to have complicity proven subsequently.i sincerely hope this does not prove to be the case.but at least now,in the light of alleged new evidence.the press now seem confident enough to ask otherwise unthinkable questions.at the very least the media should be free enough of politically correct considerations to simply ask why a four year old child was left alone in the first place.much has been made of their social status giving them an enhanced,and some may say unfair,ability to court media support.this status could well come back to haunt them.if i’m sounding dubious about the whole thing,then i offer no apology for that.it,s just that i,ve been around long enough to know that those who shout the loudest usually have something to hide.

- Posted by william king

The only line crossed was the Mirror journalist Lori Campbell who dragged Robert Murat into the fray when things were looking a bit quiet … otherwise considering this is such an unusual case it is not at all surprising the scale of media attention it is getting … perhaps Reuters and others could done more investigative reporting … All we seem to read are quotes from the Portuguese media , nobody is getting their hands dirty on the ground and finding out what is really going on ??

- Posted by John Smith

“News” is not autonomous. It doesn’t have a good or dark side. Nor is it some monolithic force.

It is composed of individuals, who do have good and dark sides and are individually - not collectively - responsible for what they do.

For that reason it is entirely to be expected.

- Posted by Hazel

I would say that “good journalism” tries to look at every story objectively and surely this could only be achieved by assuming a certain emotional distance.

While that may have been seen as a little callous at the beginning of this sad case it may served to dampen down this flood of emotion now getting in the way of fact and reason.

It seems to me that the media have behaved in the same way as the public mob now baying for blood.

Like the tide going in and out they have whipped each other up into mutual waves of at one moment sympathy and love and at another a virtual tidal wave of suspicion bordering on hate. It’s almost cannabilistic.

Isn’t it sad that this is level of frenzy is what people seem to get off on? And so the media chucks fodder at the beast as fast and as often as it can.

The mistake that the McCann’s made is that in their innocent wish to use the media to highlight their problem they didn’t realise that the media’s master was profit.

Thankfully there have been some objective articles.

I believe totally in their innocence and find myself almost hoping that they find Madeleine’s body soon (because I don’t imagine that she is still alive) and that sickens me but it would serve to bring all this speculation to an end and they could get on with the rest of their lives.

- Posted by Sarah Mackenzie

Allegations of sedating their children while they party need to be countered by hair testing the twins.

- Posted by Fab Equizi

The media are only responding to frenzied public interest in this case. It is fascinating and remains a mystery. That is what drives it. I believe in the McCanns total innocence.

- Posted by J Franks

Because they aren’t the warmest couple in the world. Because they did not shy away from the media when courting its services. It does not necessarily mean they are guilty.

- Posted by Simon

I don’t think the media coverage has been intrusive. The parent of Madeleine initially asked for the help of the media to find their girl. However, I feel the media have gone over the top with coverage. I cannot see that the general public need so much information on one single case. What about all the other missing children and their parents who get no coverage?

- Posted by Harald Kvam

What i don’t understand is that the portugese police apparently can’t say anything for months because of secrecy laws, yet now we have a policeman giving a TV interview and these constant leaks. Also how do they know what samples match madeleines dna when they don’t have a sample of Madeleines DNA. It seems to me they want to fit the McCanns up to protect their tourist industry and try to rescue the reputation of the portugese police who have received alot of negative publicity.

- Posted by Ross

You must be joking. Have you read the latest evidence? Have you read that the prosecutor has already passed 10 files to a judge?

Read here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jht ml?xml=/news/2007/09/12/nmaddy112.xml

“The amount of hair was said to be sufficient to convince police that it could only have got there directly from Madeleine’s body, rather than by “secondary transfer” from her clothes or Cuddle Cat toy.

“Bodily fluids said to have been found in the car showed signs of decomposition, it is alleged, leading police to believe that Madeleine is dead.

“There were also reports that toxicology tests on the samples in the car may have led to the suspicion that Madeleine was drugged and speculation that she may have been accidentally given an overdose of a sedative.”

And this stuff was found in the well of the car boot where the spare wheel is kept?

- Posted by Clara

in answer to the threatening rise in princess diana’s rising public profile,a royal insider said that before too long she would probably step on a landmine and that would be an end of it.metaphorically speaking the mcanns have done just that.and in keeping with the diana saga we are expected to put emotion before thought and reason.what kind of world are we living in if reasoned questions cannot be asked of a couple with enough clout to gain a high profile and world publicised audience with the pope.as a true christian i believe that the tongue was made to speak the truth and do battlei can,t accept that the media have responded to frenzy.on the contrary the mcanns have created a frenzy which they may have cause to regret.

- Posted by william king

the popular press in britain has been nothing but supportive of the mcanns,and have also gone as far as demonising johnny foreigner portuguese cops who are simply trying to solve a crime.now that some shackles have been loosened those interested in the truth can get down to the business of fact instead of useless emotional responses.at the very least the mcanns were responsible for leaving a vulnerable child alone.to my knowledge this is a crime which has been buried beneath the weight of papal audiences and high profile masses in several cathedrals.they have stepped on the landmine that princess diana missed.

- Posted by william king

You would think that newspapers would want some truth in the stories they sell. Some media have mishandled the McCann story so bad that they should disappear forever.

- Posted by Viviane, Montreal

If they didn’t do it… they have made the biggest fuss that anyone who ever lost a child has ever made before. And if they did do it… ditto. If they didn’t do it then they may be fools to expect to “turn on the media spotlight” when it suits them, and to hope to able to turn it off when it doesn’t. If they did do it, then these people are serious qeirdos.

- Posted by IC Rogers

“to my knowledge this is a crime which has been buried beneath the weight of papal audiences and high profile masses in several cathedrals.they have stepped on the landmine that princess diana missed.” –

Precisely. And the very idea that the Find Madeleine Fund is currently being investigated by the trustees to see if the McCanns can use it for their defence, is sickening. They have already contacted the QC who defended Pinochet against extradition.

- Posted by Clara

As far as the media goes..

I passed a car today with one of those ‘find Maddy’ type posters in the rear windscreen. To be honest, IF I was of the persuassion to display such a poster - it would be removed by now.

I am glad there are those out there who believe in Innocent until proven Guilty - but frankly I see this case as Guilty until proven Innocent. Point Blank: We would never leave our children unnattended at home while we went a few doors up the road to have a social - never mind in unfamiliar territory. Reality: We can remember every nose bleed, lasceration or minor bump our 9 year old has ever had… To me it is only respect to the Portugeuse Police, as they cannot be inept… unfortunately in search for the truth they may have gave too much credibility to the professional family - being doctors and all (They would’ve done the same in the UK).

My feelings are that had these parents been of working class - this case might be further ahead! Furthermore their kids would probably be with social services by now ( as a precautionary measure.)

I only hope the accussed are truely innocent - and wish THEIR daughter is still alive - and whatever comes to light… I hope they do too!

Let the truth out?!

- Posted by Sean D'Movie

I remember a British paper publishing a forged sketch, without a face, of the suspect kidnapper attributing it to the Portuguese Police and asking: «Would you recognise someone with this?».

I also remember The Sun’s description of Robert Murat, when he was made formal suspect: «The oddball of the Algarve». I wonder how they came to that conclusion. Child porn material was found on his computer but his reputation was of a respectable man, and everyone in Praia da Luz was shocked in the event. No one ever said he was an oddball.

From what we’ve be witnessing since this case started, the British media are too powerful and feel at ease to lie, because they know they can get away with it. Never let the truth get in the way of a good story.

- Posted by Joao, Lisbon

No the media coverage has not been intrusive. If these parents were of a lower socio-economic group they would have been dragged through the papers with terrible allegations being made against them and their (lack of) parenting skills. Whilst I feel nothing but sympathy to any parent who loses a child I must express my concern about children being left alone in hotel rooms whilst their parents wine and dine, it’s not as if ther McCanns couldn’t afford a sitter.
The McCanns wanted the media in the early days when it suited their cause well unfortunatey you can’t switch it off when it doesn’t suit you.

- Posted by Clare

A four-year-old British child on holiday in Portugal is missing with scarcely a trace. The story so far is full of gaps, inconsistencies, reshashed information and hard-to-believe errors. Turn up the heat on this murky story and these inscrutable characters, please. When a child is missing, a major line has been crossed, so let’s not worry about the
precious privacy of the Drs. McCann. That should be least of their worries at a time like this, too, one would hope.

- Posted by Donna Carmichael

I find so many of these responses sad. None of us are perfect parents. I challenge any of you to deny not doing something in your child’s life that may have been considered “cavalier” by somebody else.

I am sure that the McCann’s are not totally surprised at being considered suspects parents always are the prime suspects but to have the sheer outpouring of anger and bile thrown in their direction must have come as a shock.

If they are guilty good invesigation, forensics and journalism may prove but until then surely we should support a cornerstone of our justice system which is innocent until proven otherwise.

If they aren’t guilty? If this case is never resolved what then? This media storm has damned them forever in a lot of people’s minds. Just remember all of those women who went to jail for killing their children on the evidence of one renowned forensic expert.

- Posted by Sarah Mackenzie

I am not a Catholic - perhaps a lapsed Anglican and not very religious- however, I see that the McCanns have been clinging to their Catholic faith in this harrowing time.If the McCanns are in some way connected to their daughters death then I would wish to pray for their souls; for they are, if guilty, about to enter the darkness of limbo. Not one of us should wish for their souls to enter this absolute darkeness. Let us show them both benefit of doubt as well as kindness.

- Posted by Bill Coleman

The McCann’s have made their bed and can now lie in it……..

- Posted by Peter Schwarz

What a lot of hot air. Everyone thinks their opinion (note - not knowledge) is soooooo important.

- Posted by Ian

We are all jumping the gun here abit, as suspicious as I am of Maddy’s parents, the full facts behind the evidence is not yet known to anyone other than the Portuguese authorities. It does appear things are being leaked, no doubt with an agenda in mind, but you can’t base a case on heresay and gossip and what amounts at the moment to tiny little snippets of everything they have got. If the evidence had been that strong I doubt very much that they would have been allowed to leave Portugal after being named as suspects.

- Posted by Gerald Paston

Is it a surprise that two intelligent people manipulated the media in their moment of crises? Should they be vilified for being able to effectively launch a campaign? There should be a limit over the insinuations journalists are allowed to make. How can they now hope to have a fair trial?

- Posted by Becca T

This story is out of proportion to all the other stories of missing children. Too many people seem to believe that they are able to prejudge the case from all the apparent leaks and apparent counter-leaks. It is these same people who will sit on British juries evaluating the evidence brought before them - a frightening thought.

One “lesson learned” from this should be that once the media is involved, it can be difficult to control where they go. I do not blame the media as there has been plenty of interest in the story - so blame the readers / viewers who have fanned the flames

- Posted by Stuart

I have a few comments:

The media - you can’t burn the candle at both ends, in the end you get burt! meaning, the McCann’s used the media from the beginning and have worldwide interest, why should it stop now? However, I do think that everyone is entitled (as a human right) to have a little privacy, as you would probably go mad if you could not have any peace.

Maddie - if the McCanns felt the need to check on the kids every 15/30 mins or so, why bother going out. I mean, did they not sleep through the night once put down? I have never left my kids alone here or abroad; not even with a sitter abroad.

Holiday party - with what I read a couple of months ago, the holiday party had agreed not to say anything - “code of silence”. Maybe the police should go through that door if they have suspions at all about the McCanns.

Red heron - I am assuming that Maddie has been abducted. So, do you think there is a possibility that the authorities are trying to let the media and public think that they are focusing on the McCann’s, so maybe the real abductor will think it is safe to surface?

back to Maddie - assuming that she was abducted, if the McCann’s had told the truth about the times the kids were being checked on in the beginning (if every 15 or so mins, what would be the poiont in going out)then the radius for searching would have been expanded. Maybe the ports and harbours would have been thoroughly checked.

Anyway, innocent until proven guilty, yes?

- Posted by Theresa

The media is obsessed with the McCanns but so are many people in the public. If they were poor and did not look perfect for the photographs and cameras, would they find themselves in the news everyday. I very much doubt it.
The McCanns are a sympton of society in the UK. People are fixated with celebrity and status and the McCanns are simply an extension of this attitude. Some people also seem too have become over emotional about them on the internet and in conversations, a sort of mass hysteria, talking to Kate and Gerry as though they know them personally, some seem almost on the verge of tears. This emotional need to identify with the couple is frankly unhealthy and a little bit scary.
The Portuguese police have become bumbling stupid men, who spend their waking hours creating evil plots to frame innocent people.
Although I am not saying the couple are guilty, we also cannot completely say that they are totally innocent until all the facts and forensic results come to light.
I think the media attention they have sought out themsleves from the beginning is strange.
There are many other missing children in the world and in the UK. There are many other parents suffering who will never have the amount of attention or sympathy that this couple have received.
These desperate people exist but we don’t know their names. That is the saddest thing about this situation.

- Posted by rosa

“but you cant base a case on heresay and gossip and what amounts at the moment to tiny little snippets of everything they have got” –Gerald Paston

I don’t see how it’s being based on that, at all. They have already given ten files to the prosecutor who has already passed them to a judge. So just because we don’t know everything that’s in those files you call it hearsay and gossip. Do you really think that the Portuguese police are fools? I don’t.

- Posted by Clara

They courted the media far beyond the boundaries of tastefulness or what was necessary to launch a campaign. David Beckham, the Pope, USA… A new low was reached when Ken Bigleys family was drawn in. And now the media has turned around and bit them on the nose. Quelle surprise!
And now it’s asserted the Portuguese police is trying to fit them up. What with the close working relationship with the British authorities and the spotlight of the world on them - I hardly think so!

- Posted by Chrissy

“And now its asserted the Portuguese police is trying to fit them up. What with the close working relationship with the British authorities and the spotlight of the world on them - I hardly think so!” —

Indeed. AND, if the reports of Madeleine’s hair being found in the car boot are indeed accurate: If the poor child was dead and not in police custody for those 25 days, where would the police get her hair to “plant” in the car?

Also, many people are asking who had rented the car before the the McCanns and “why” the Portuguese police hadn’t investigated that angle. I don’t have the link, unfortunately, but I have *specifically* read that the police have contacted them all - and ruled them out. People are assuming the Portuguese police are dumb fools. Typical prejudice about ‘Johnny foreigner’.

- Posted by Clara

“They have already contacted the QC who defended Pinochet against extradition.”

Clara just in response to this comment. I would also contact the best barrister I could find to defend me if I was being accused of or investigated in relation to the disappearance of my child. Many parents of missing children get accused. A good representitive can make the ordeal a whole lot easier to bear and get it delt with quickly and effectivly.

I hope this doesnt seem like an attack on you but assuming they are innocent, which they are until proven guilty in the U.K, then this is EXACTLY what they should do.

However using the fund for the defence makes me feel a little ill. That was a bad move on their part and will reflect badly on them in the public eye.

On a more general note the allegations of corruption against the Portugese police, whilst very easy to make, have little to no basis. They are going to be scrutinised so closely in this case that even the tiniest slip would turn the case on its head and probably have the whole thing dismissed. They want this solved as much as anyone. Its their countrys tourism that will suffer if it isnt. They have sent files to prosecutors for a reason. And maybe they are running a smoke screen to hide what they are really doing as has been suggested. If that is the case then they are doing that masterfully.

Well that got much longer than I intended. So I’ll leave you all with this thought. The parents may or may not be guilty, the police may or may not be trying to frame them. Maddie may or may not have been abducted. Irrespective there is not one person here who knows for certain what happend, and if there is will you please contact the police and tell them because this ordeaql has gone on for far too long.

- Posted by K F

K F, you wrote:

“I would also contact the best barrister I could find to defend me if I was being accused of or investigated in relation to the disappearance of my child.”

Indeed. But they are now talking of setting up another fund, not only to solicit money for their legal defence, but also for PR expenses. (If I was accused of the manslaughter of my son, PR would be the last thing on my mind.)

“I hope this doesnt seem like an attack on you but assuming they are innocent, which they are until proven guilty in the U.K.”

Or until proven guilty in Portugal.

“Its their countrys tourism that will suffer if it isnt.”

I’d like to think they have a more professional interest in their job than to worry only about tourism. Some police are actually interested in justice.

“The parents may or may not be guilty, the police may or may not be trying to frame them.”

There is no evidence whatsoever that the police are trying to frame them. The McCanns have claimed that they are. That’s all. The local police in Praia da Luz may have little experience of such major crimes, but they have drafted in assistance from higher up, PLUS British detectives. Quite a number of them, by all accounts.

“Maddie may or may not have been abducted.”

Please remember that there is no evidence of abduction either. Only that the McCanns have said there was one.

You’ll have to forgive me. I have become highly irritated at some of the less intelligent and highly xenophobic remarks I’ve read in numerous places in the past few days. One of which outraged posters (elsewhere) suggested that the McCanns should be given “diplomatic immunity”. Apparently because they’re British.

I also know that the first suspects in cases such as this are, 1) family members and, 2) the people who saw the victim last. Both of which apply to the parents. So there is no reason whatsoever to criticise the Portuguese police for suspecting them. But I have seen SO much of that in recent days.

So, Amen, let there be justice for Madeleine. And let the McCanns employ as many lawyers as they wish. All I want to see is the truth coming out, *whichever* way it goes.

- Posted by Clara

Clara, you wrote

“But they are now talking of setting up another fund, not only to solicit money for their legal defence, but also for PR expenses.”

If that is the case, i have heard nothing about it either way, they should be shot. PR expenses? I hope you are wrong. That to me would suggest to me they are a very callous pair and also makes them look more guilty. And I jsut dont want to believe that they did it for 2 reasons.

1:- they will have killed their own child. I ont think I need to go into the problems with that.

2:- It makes them very stupid people. Getting this much media coverage. They are doctors. They are supposed to be intelligent.

“Or until proven guilty in Portugal”

I am unsure if Portugal have the presumption of innocence. My comment in relation to the UK was down to having them moved from the UK to Portugal to stand trial there. I should have clarified that.

“Some police are actually interested in justice.”

Valid point. My comment was badly thought out and in poor taste.

“There is no evidence whatsoever that the police are trying to frame them. The McCanns have claimed that they are.”

Valid point. But it may be true. Hence my saying they may or may not. This also holds true for the other comments where I said may or may not. The fact is we dont know. There is presumably, although we dont know this for sure either, a large amount of things that are known by the parties involved that we dont know.

“Youll have to forgive me. I have become highly irritated at some of the less intelligent and highly xenophobic remarks Ive read in numerous places in the past few days.”

I know what you mean. It is becoming a little rediculous what people will say. But everyone has their opinion which they are entitled to under the European Convention. Plus on the internet you will find every viewpoint imaginable presented.

“One of which outraged posters (elsewhere) suggested that the McCanns should be given diplomatic immunity. Apparently because theyre British.”

I dont think Diplomatic Immunity exists between EU member states. The McCanns wont get it anyway. They put themselves in the spotlight. The UK government dont need that kind of publicity. Sheltering potential murders from justice

There is a good chance that it was the parents. But I say let the police do their job and let the media sotp demonising the police for following standard proceedure.

And I want to see the truth come out. But most of all I want Madeleine found.

- Posted by K F

I belive the media should focus on all information that is relevant, and not publice everything! This is making the media go out of controlling brinigng false leads etc! The parents are not guilty… someone is, so let’s find them and bring madeline home!

- Posted by James

Isn’t it more to the point how (probably fraternal) protectionism for the McCann’s has crossed the line. Not least of all, a top government P.R master resigning his post to work the interest of this couple is certainly not a normality. Whether they are guilty or innocent this is not an ordinary run of the mill abduction, or whatever, case. It involves mighty lots of money, top lawyers and at best and least some whitewashing.
Obviously P.R is important to The McCanns, since they consented to drug tests that have apparently cleared them of wrong doing. Why not progress to a Lie Detector test to be carried on them out by Police professionals to draw the same conclusion. Surely their truths here will also stand out, so it would work to their advantage, not least when suing their public enemy number one as they have threatened?

- Posted by Bob

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word