Ever since he set sail for Cuba from Mexico in the dead of night 52 years ago aboard the Granma, Fidel Castro has been a towering figure on the world stage.
His toppling of U.S.-backed dictator Fulgencio Batista and the establishment of a communist state within swimming distance of Florida was to provoke one of the most infamous humiliations of the Cold War and its indisputably most dangerous moment.
The first was the 1961 Bay of Pigs fiasco, in which a band of Cuban exiles funded by the Kennedy administration failed miserably in an attempt to retake the island. The people, they realised to their cost, liked Fidel and were not about to rise against him.
The second, the following year, was the Cuban missile crisis, when he allowed Moscow to station nuclear missiles on Cuba, prompting a stand-off between the Kremlin and the White House which brought the world within a whisker of nuclear war.
His supporters point to very real Socialist achievements like the island’s health services. He himself once said: “One of the greatest benefits of the revolution is that even our prostitutes are college graduates.”
His detractors, principally his implacable exiled foes in Miami, revile him as a tyrant.
Do you believe his quitting the stage will make any difference to Cuba’s future direction? Was the island in a sense being held a hostage to history by his presence?
Or had he already become just the figurehead of a government that intends to remain firmly on its Communist course?