The Arab Spring: Tragic event, or unfortunate setback?

April 25, 2012

Re-reading can lead you to real gems. Going back over JPMorgan’s annual letter to shareholders, I couldn’t believe that the first time around I missed this quote in the third paragraph of the first page:

In addition to the ongoing global economic uncertainty, other traumatic events — such as the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, the debt ceiling fiasco in the United States, revolutions in the Middle East and the European debt crisis — have impeded recovery. In the face of these tragic events and unfortunate setbacks, the frustration with — and hostility toward — our industry continues. [emphasis added]

There are a lot of ways to describe the Arab Spring. Most do not imply that it was either a tragic event or an unfortunate setback, but Jamie Dimon does. Or, at least, what his ghostwriters did. As a human being, that’s a pretty callous way to describe a series of popular uprisings against autocratic governments. But let’s think like Jamie Dimon. As the Chairman and CEO of  a global financial institution, does it make sense?

In a very limited sense, yes. The Arab Spring probably played a role in spiking oil prices. Here’s a chart of Brent crude prices from 2009 to April 2012, from EIA stats:

Oil prices clearly rise starting in the winter of 2010/11, when the Arab Spring began in Tunisia. And they have stayed at more or less elevated levels since. That makes sense given that the overthrows of autocratic governments come with uncertainty and economic disruption. Still, there’s a strong case that overthrowing repressive regimes with calcified economies would be a good thing for markets.

And then there’s the even stronger case that, irrespective of market impact, the Arab Spring is good. But Jamie Dimon will leave those ideas to whatever small portion of his thoughts are not filed under shareholder value.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

Jamie Dimon mind is most likely entirely captured by thoughts of his pocket book.But there is very little evidence that the “Arab Spring” caused oil prices to rise. More likely rising food prices caused the “Arab Spring.”

Furthermore, you betray a very naive reading of recent events and past history to act as if it is obvious that the recent events in the Arab world are a blessing.Many tyrants and dictators have been overthrown in this world. But very few of those overthrows has resulted in a net benefit for the human race. The test of a good revolution is not who went down but what comes after.

Posted by apeman1 | Report as abusive

What case is there that the “Arab Spring” was good?

Posted by Danny_Black | Report as abusive