Disrupting the market for helping people lose money
Investors tend to lose money in boring, but effective, ways. Motif Investing (‚Äúturn any idea into a motif‚ÄĚ) promises to disrupt this predictable pattern by helping people lose their money in new and exciting ways. Motif‚Äôs CEO proudly describes the company as like the iPhone, but for investing, with the ease of shopping on Amazon. The fact that that description makes no sense at all does not make it any less terrifying. It wasn‚Äôt hard to predict that Twitter mockery would (rightfully) ensue.
Here‚Äôs PandoDaily‚Äôs Michael Carney trying to describe what Motif actually does:
Since launching in 2010, the company has offered its own motif based investment ideas and allowed regular Joes and Janes to view data on the performance of these ideas, and then make actual investments. Consider it one part E*TRADE-esque online brokerage, one part think tank, one part tech startup.
Here are more gems from the PandoDaily piece:
- ‚ÄúEach of us has areas of expertise, or even of personal curiosity, that may offer insights into the way the stock market will behave in the future.‚ÄĚ Sure, we might, but if we do, the best thing to do about them is nothing.
- ‚ÄúMotif Investing is… looking to turn Wall Street on its head.‚ÄĚ This will end well.
- ‚ÄúUsers can also share the motifs they create via Facebook and Twitter.‚ÄĚ Twitter is a great place to get stock ideas from people who lie about who they are and what stocks they own.
- ‚ÄúMotifs can be more than just collections of stocks.‚ÄĚ You can also invest in Facebook likes.
- ‚ÄúFund creators will be able to make money through royalties when other investors buy their funds.‚ÄĚ So it‚Äôs really like Reddit plus Herbalife, but for stocks.
- ‚ÄúIf an investor can create demand for the stocks in their Motif, they‚Äôre likely to increase in value.‚ÄĚ This is bad, as Matthew Klein tweeted. But to be fair, it was also the basis of Giovanni Ribisi‚Äôs best work.
- ‚ÄúUsers can access financial data through Google Finance and Yahoo Finance.‚ÄĚ This data is also available to any user of the internet.
Also, the pricing is terrible. Commission are a flat $9.95, and are charged not only on every trade, but also whenever a trade is rebalanced, which can happen automatically on a quarterly or annual basis. The investment minimum is $250, and the max is $100,000. I think most Motif users will be closer to $250 than $100,000. Motif probably thinks the same thing, or else they wouldn‚Äôt have chosen a regressive, flat-fee model. If you put $1,000 into a Motif account on a single trade, alter that trade once during the year, and assume quarterly rebalancing, you‚Äôve just incurred 5.97% in annual fees. Accounts with the minimum $250 value rebalanced quarterly are charged annual fees of around 12%. To get an idea of what a terrible deal this is, the Vanguard 2045 target date fund charges a¬†0.18%¬†fee.
Inexplicably, Arthur Levitt, the former head of the SEC, and Sallie Krawcheck, former CEO of Merrill Lynch Wealth Management, former CEO of Smith Barney, and former CFO of Citigroup, are now on the company‚Äôs advisory board. Levitt and Krawcheck must be getting paid well for their work (Motif has raised $26 million in funding), because I can‚Äôt why else they‚Äôd want to be be associated with this kind of company.
Since leaving BofA, Krawcheck has written serious columns about the need for money market reform, and was recently angling to lead the SEC, along with saying very politic things about bank bonuses. Levitt is a policy advisor to Goldman Sachs, but has retained a fair degree of independence. He, like Krawcheck, probably values his reputation more than compensation at this point in his career. It‚Äôs baffling that either of them would want to be on the board of a company that can easily be described as ‚Äúlike Farmville, but for stocks.‚ÄĚ