Welcome to the Counterparties email. The sign-up page is here, it’s just a matter of checking a box if you’re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints to Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com.
Bloomberg’s Daniel Akst calls the book infuriating, writing that the “plodding text oscillates maddeningly between equivocation and chutzpah”. Akst slams Greenspan for calling the financial crisis “almost universally unanticipated”, despite what Akst says were “a host of indicators that were pointing to trouble”. Akst is frustrated that despite the book’s subtitle (“Risk, Human Nature, and the Future of Forecasting”), and the author’s self-professed expertise in economic forecasting, how Greenspan could have not seen danger ahead is barely explored. Furthermore, Greenspan’s claimed concern for federal deficits is undercut, Akst writes, by his endorsement of both of President Bush’s rounds of tax cuts.
The WaPo’s Steven Pearlstein says Greenspan’s effort at introspection simply yields a reiteration of his prior “unshakable faith in free markets, an antipathy toward market regulation, and a conviction that progressive taxes and social spending are to blame for slow growth, stagnant wages and exploding deficits”.
Paul Krugman expands the criticism, pointing to “Greenspan’s amazing track record since leaving office — a record of being wrong about everything, and learning nothing therefrom”. Greenspan’s refusal to accept responsibility for his misjudgment makes him, in Krugman’s view, not just a “bad economist... he’s being a bad person”.