Reuters Blogs

Blogs navigation

Just another Blogs.reuters.com weblog

February 13th, 2006

Mobile IM, but not for free

Posted by: Reuters Staff
Tags: Uncategorized

sky.JPGThe mobile industry unveiled plans to bring instant messaging (IM) to cell phones later this year to tap a new source of revenues and build on the success of text messaging, Santosh Menon reports.

Fifteen of the world’s top mobile operators, including Vodafone, Orange, T-Mobile, Telefonica and China Mobile announced plans to roll out PC-type instant messaging services initially targeting some 700 million mobile users.

But the service will not be free, and mobile operators plan to charge clients using the familiar “calling party pays principle”, under which users pay for sending messages but not for receiving them.

2 comments so far

This looks like another reason to go Windows Mobile as a Messenger Client is built in and can be used without paying more above a base data plan.

- Posted by Simon Drew

That’s not big news: mobile IM will replace the SMS system which is both expensive and too basic.

The biggest operators don’t want to see the SMS money leave their pocket, we can all understand this. That’s why they’re thinking about doing something in common.

There’s an alternative though: Crickee.
Crickee is an independent firm and its IM software will soon be compatible with most of the phones currently on the market.

I’m part of the Crickee team. Visit our website http://www.crickee.com and let us know what’s on your mind about mobile IM !

- Posted by Alexandre Joint

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous.information.