<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile IM, but not for free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2006/02/13/mobile-im-but-not-for-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2006/02/13/mobile-im-but-not-for-free/</link>
	<description>Just another Blogs.reuters.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre Joint</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2006/02/13/mobile-im-but-not-for-free/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre Joint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/2006/02/13/mobile-im-but-not-for-free/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>That's not big news: mobile IM will replace the SMS system which is both expensive and too basic.

The biggest operators don't want to see the SMS money leave their pocket, we can all understand this. That's why they're thinking about doing something in common.

There's an alternative though: Crickee.
Crickee is an independent firm and its IM software will soon be compatible with most of the phones currently on the market.

I'm part of the Crickee team. Visit our website www.crickee.com and let us know what's on your mind about mobile IM !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not big news: mobile IM will replace the SMS system which is both expensive and too basic.</p>
<p>The biggest operators don&#8217;t want to see the SMS money leave their pocket, we can all understand this. That&#8217;s why they&#8217;re thinking about doing something in common.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an alternative though: Crickee.<br />
Crickee is an independent firm and its IM software will soon be compatible with most of the phones currently on the market.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m part of the Crickee team. Visit our website <a href="http://www.crickee.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.crickee.com</a> and let us know what&#8217;s on your mind about mobile IM !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Drew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2006/02/13/mobile-im-but-not-for-free/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/2006/02/13/mobile-im-but-not-for-free/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>This looks like another reason to go Windows Mobile as a Messenger Client  is built in and can be used without paying more above a base data plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like another reason to go Windows Mobile as a Messenger Client  is built in and can be used without paying more above a base data plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
