Reuters Blogs

Blogs navigation

Just another Blogs.reuters.com weblog

13:35 May 3rd, 2006

The world has its say and bloggers vs mainstream media

Posted by: Astrid Zweynert
Tags: Uncategorized

     ”World Have Your Say” from the BBC’s World Service was coming live from the We Media forum, offering a taste of participatory media on a global scale. The programme aims to engage ordinary people with newsmakers by enabling them to discuss current affairs events that have a direct impact on their lives. Topics debated included a day of bloodshed in Iraq, and - because it came from the We Media forum - how people around the world are using new media.
    Many participants said they used blogs as one source of daily information, in addition to mainstream media. But who do they trust - mainstream media, bloggers or citizen journalists? Not just one source is the answer.
    Using more than one source of information thanks to new technology was cited by many as a key development in how they used the media rather than trusting one source, a variety of news and views helps them to form their opinion about what is happening in the world. Reuters Editor Political and General News Paul Holmes said: “No news organisation in the history of the media has had a monopoly on the truth. What is different today is that there are many different voices.”
    An earlier debate about blogging and citizen journalism gave some bloggers in the audience a sense of us (the bloggers) and them (the mainstream media).
    But as one participant pointed out “It’s not just one or the other.”
    “Comparing blogs to mainstream media is completely meaningless,” said another participant in the audience in London. “They can’t be directly compared because they serve a different purpose. With blogs you establish a relationship over time. You never get that with a journalist.”
    The BBC’s director of global news Richard Sambrook told the conference: “We easily get trapped in either/or mindset: Mainstream versus bloggers. Get over it. We live in a remixed, mashed-up world.”
    The forum also debated truth and accuracy in the media.
    George Brock of The Times newspaper said they loved to hear peoples
stories. But they had to be newsworthy and true. At the end of the day, people want reliability and accuracy, he argued.
    The message was echoed by the BBCs director of news Helen Boaden.
    “Witness accounts do not necessarily give you an objective, factual picture. They give you the truth as they see it,” she said. ”The role of journalism is to sift facts and give you a truthful and factual picture.”
    Rachel North was caught up in on the bomb attacks on London’s transport network and started blogging about her experience.She told the audience that her blogging had been driven by an overwhelming desire to tell her story. Citizen journalism, she said, is “telling stories of the people, for the people, by the people”.

    Actor and activist Richard Dreyfuss asked the audience how in a world of instant, non-stop news people have time to think.
    He argued for the need for reason, debate and logic. He spoke about what he called “instantaneous knowledge and the loss of rumination, patience and simply thinking things through.
    The trend towards 24/7 news is being accelerated by technology, Dreyfuss said.
    “I applaud the technology that leads us all here, he said. “But I dont applaud the self-imposed blindness when we overlook the potential damage this technology can do.
    “And this is something everyone in broadcasting should start thinking about. The technology is demanding that we re-think how to think.”

3 comments so far

Take That, WeMedia!…

The Mainstream Media (MSM) doesn’t appear to know exactly what to do with or about Citizen Journalism (The Blogosphere.) Some media have taken the “if you can’t beat ‘em join ‘em” approach: some newspapers and TV networks offer “blogs” of their…

- Posted by Capital Region People

The Western Standard, La Presse, and the National Post are offering blogs…
But these blogs are not critical of the mainstream media, for obvious reasons.
The Mediocre Media blogging series, HonestReportingCanada, the AntiMedia blog, all provide much needed perspective, which the MSM blogs lack. It’s a sort of rebellious, maverick nature that can’t be had with an MSM outlet.
lecentre
Centrerion.blogspot.com
host of Mediocre Media (http://centrerion.blogspot.com/2006/04/ mediocre-media-2.html)

- Posted by lecentre

[...] Misschien nog wel het interessantste beeld van de ontwikkelingen in het medialandschap was te zien in de verslagen van de eerste dag van de conferentie zelf. Mede-organisator Reuters publiceerde zelf een zakelijk bericht, zij het met een ondertoon van: kijk eens wat een bijzondere gebeurtenis (mijn interpretatie). Alles in het bericht klopte weliswaar volgens de wetten van de traditionele journalistiek, er stond geen woord gelogen. Maar gaf het ook een goed beeld van de conferentie, en van de manier waarop deelnemers (of in ieder geval: die deelnemers met een weblog) de conferentie hebben ervaren? Dat hangt ervanaf, lees daarvoor deze http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/05/03  /mind-numbing-conference/ en deze http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/ zeer kritische verslagen. Is het een daardoor een beter verslag dan het andere? Niet per se, ze hebben alleen allebei een eigen functie. Dat brengt mij weer bij de enquete van BBC en Reuters: het overgrote deel van de respondenten gaf aan dat ze het liefst meerdere bronnen raadplegen bij hun nieuwsconsumptie. Trackback [...]

- Posted by De nieuwe reporter » Blog Archive » Journalistiek vs Weblogs: We Media conferentie stelt de verkeerde vragen

Post Your Comment

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.