Reuters Blogs

Blogs navigation

Just another Blogs.reuters.com weblog

10:03 October 30th, 2006

Working for Reuters as an Iraqi in Baghdad

Posted by: Paul Holmes
Tags: Uncategorized

Reuters, like the few other foreign news organizations still present in Baghdad, could not operate without Iraqi journalists to report, film and photograph life and death on the streets of Iraq. So I came to Baghdad to meet them and see how our operation works.

Our compound, protectBaghdad-image.jpged by blast walls, razor wire, searchlights, armed Iraqi guards and British security advisers, is on the east bank of the Tigris across the river from the fortified Green Zone. Its the workplace for about 40 journalists. Only seven of them are non-Iraqis our British bureau chief, four correspondents who are Basque, British, Lebanese and South African, a Filipino chief photographer and a television producer who is Jordanian.

We have Iraqi Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds in our newsroom and all are aware of the Reuters reputation for fairness and accuracy and how they must help maintain it. Like Reuters journalists anywhere in the world, they leave their politics, ethnic roots and religion at home.

Several of our staff have been with Reuters since before the 2003 invasion when working for a foreign news agency meant the risk of falling foul of Saddam Husseins security men. Others joined us after the invasion. As in so many places where conflict convulses a country, some of our more recent colleagues are accidents of history who have switched to journalism when their world was turned upside down.

One of our reporters, a man with excellent English, is a lawyer. Another colleague is a bookseller who monitors Iraqi TV networks for news Reuters reporters can then check independently. Others used to be commercial photographers or videographers. Until three years ago they filmed weddings. Now they chronicle the carnage of everyday Iraq.

We train all our staff, regardless of nationality, both inside and outside Iraq. They all understand the Reuters principles of independence, integrity and freedom from bias. A team spirit means that, as they did on Saturday evening, they can sit and talk together while sharing a smoke from a hookah pipe without regarding each other as rivals across the deadly sectarian and ethnic divides that prevail in the world outside the compound.

All of them have tales of personal tragedy to tell — stories of the killings of loved ones and other sufferings that have afflicted Iraq since 2003. Im not going to name them because so many Iraqi journalists fear that divulging their identity amounts to a death sentence at the hands of insurgents or militias. As I am writing this on Sunday, an Iraqi woman who presents a sports show on Iraqi state television has just been found killed with her driver in their car.

One of our cameramen had to flee his home, postpone his wedding and move his extended family abroad after a sectarian militia ran him out of his neighborhood. Another of our journalists had to move to Baghdad, where he now lives in the Reuters compound, after insurgents shot dead his brother as part of a campaign to intimidate journalists into leaving the town of Mosul. Yet another got a phone call at work one day from his wife to tell him she was laying seriously wounded outside their home after a bomb went off. Two of his male relatives have been kidnapped and remain missing. One man is the brother of a Reuters TV soundman who was shot dead by U.S. forces on his way to report a story last year.

These are typical stories in todays Iraq. What is uncommon is the dedication that these journalists bring to covering the news for Reuters.

The foreigners rarely leave our compound, other than for a brief ride in an armored car to a news conference or interview in the Green Zone or to travel to and from the airport for their rotations in and out of Baghdad. They also make use of facilities such as U.S. military embeds and trips by Iraqi or foreign officials to get around the country when they can.

Its the same story for most foreign news services. The kidnapping of foreigners in Iraq may have gone down over the past year but that may in part be because far fewer of them brave the streets. By contrast, our Iraqi staff are out every day, rushing to the scene of attacks, recording the hardships of daily life and interviewing the Iraqi civilians on the receiving end of this conflict whose voice is never heard enough.

Every day when I come to Reuters, I feel proud to be here. Its important to help the world understand what is happening in my country, one of them told me. Reuters, I told him, was just as proud of him.

Paul Holmes is Reuters Global Editor for Political and General News. He’ll take reader comments to this post until 3 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday and plans to post a response at 3 p.m. Eastern on Thursday. 

Picture credit: A man walks past a vehicle damaged by a roadside bomb attack in Baghdad, Oct 28, 2006. REUTERS/Thaier Al-Sudani

35 comments so far

[...] Paul Holmes has written about conditions for our bureau in ‘Working for Reuters as an Iraqi in Baghdad and in answers to readers’ questions. We at Reuters were fortunate not to have casualties this year, but it is clear from the statistics that the chaotic conditions in Iraq have made it one of the deadliest conflicts for journalists ever. [...]

- Posted by Deadly news - Reuters Blogs

To BOBO - I can assure you that our journalists are motivated by nothing other than a desire to report what is happening in Iraq as accurately and dispassionately as possible. That quest has already cost four of them their lives. Our journalists also use hard evidence and reputable sources to back up their reporting. I recommend that you read the report of the Iraq Study Group, a bipartisan body made up of some of the most noted experts in diplomacy, military affairs, economics and juistice from both sides of the American mainstream political spectrum. It is available for $10.95 in bookstores and online. Its findings certainly do not support your sweeping and unattributed assertion that 80% of Iraq is “somewhat peaceful”. Here is what the report says about security in Iraq(page 6):

“Four of Iraq’s eighteen provinces are highly insecure — Baghdad, Anbar, Diyala and Salah ad Din. These provinces account for about 40 percent of Iraq’s population of 26 million … The most stable parts of the country are the three provinces of the Kurdish north and parts of the Shia south. However, most of Iraq’s cities have a sectarian mix and are plagued by persistent violence.”

Best wishes.

- Posted by Paul Holmes

I want to know why you are all terrorists sympathizers? By the way NO WAR is popular and why don’t you report the good things happening, like the 5000 schools and the hospitals that are now open or that 80% of Iraq is somewhat peaceful. I know why it doesn’t fit you anti-american agenda. I hope you all get what you deserve.

- Posted by BOBO

How do you know Reuters is free from biases coming from centuries-old cultural trends from all around the world? Is it possible to run a news organization free of biases from millenia-old cultural-religious traditions and political trends?

Or would those biases quickly become evident when a hookah is shared in a Reuters Baghdad newsroom?
Is it common humanity that binds the media in its quest for knowledge on the days events?

By the way, I work as a reporter in the northeastern United States.

- Posted by Alvaro Alarcon

Here again - “US ‘Fails’ to protect illegal workers”. What country in the world fails to protect illegal immigrants? ALL! BAD - BAD U.S.! Illegal immigrants are felons. How would you like us to protect felons? Perhaps arresting them would be the first start.
Great reporting. No bias here!

- Posted by Roy Hastings

It is now 11.30 p.m. Baghdad time, 3.30 p.m. Eastern. Everyone here in the Reuters Baghdad newsroom has been fascinated by the questions you’ve all asked. I’ll reply on Thursday. The post should go up by 11 p.m. Baghdad time, 3 p.m. Eastern.

- Posted by Paul Holmes

Really! You’re kidding right? I thought you folks got all you’re news from the terrorists. Like the picture of an American GI getting shot. Don’t all the major media work together to discredit our soldiers and the war. I’m sorry if I have the wrong impresssion but i don’t think I do. Maybe we should check with Mr Kerry the traitor to get the real truth about the war.

- Posted by Jim Patterson

Can you explain why people are allowed to carry assault rifles in public in Iraq?

What do you think would happen if I was carrying an AK-47 in Times Square?

The first thing that needs to be done is to confiscate these weapons.

I don’t see people in Istanbul, carrying RPG’s and AK’s

- Posted by Stephen

I am very appreciative of your team’s work in Iraq. Living in Seoul, Korea, just minutes from possible war at any given moment, I’ve discovered, that it’s the journalists that keep the world safe. The free flow of accurate information is essential, not only to promoting and preserving democracy, but to preserving a delicate peace. I hope that the Reuters Iraq team knows when to keep their heads down and stays safe while on the battlefield.

- Posted by Brian Dear

We sometimes hear about these spectacular, harrowing corkscrew landings undertaken by aircraft landing in Baghdad. But we never see video of these landings, even though it sounds like they would make for great footage. Why? Is video of aircraft something that is prohibited under censorship rules?

- Posted by Jed

Now that Iraq has a free press, how often are they used as sources and which source seems to be the most credible?

Also, if an Iraqi doesn’t own photoshop, do you guys supply them with a copy or allow them access to a computer with the software installed?

- Posted by Ben Lipstein

“Next time people like whodunit want to laught [sic] at Reuters for mistakes they have to deal with they should be bold enough to give their full names.”

What… you weren’t “bold enough” to give yours, George?

- Posted by Alan Smithee

How much of what happens do you, and thus we actually get to know? Why arent there any images of dead US soldiers? How hard is censorship?

How much is what I read here propaganda and not news?

- Posted by Nic

Next time people like whodunit want to laught at Reuters for mistakes they have to deal with they should be bold enough to give their full names.

- Posted by George

In your report you say ‘they can sit and talk together while sharing a smoke from a hookah pipe without regarding each other as rivals across the deadly sectarian and ethnic divides that prevail in the world outside the compound’. In the context you say it one might assume that this could not happen anywhere else where people can meet without being threatened. Is that true? Or is it more like people would usually meet like that if their wasn’t a constant threat of several ‘factions’ (not individuals), upsetting normal live.

Beside that question I would like to express my respect and gratitude to everyone trying to report with as much objectivity as (s)he can manage under these extreme circumstances.

- Posted by Roelf Renkema

Post Your Comment

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.