Reuters Blogs

Blogs navigation

Just another Blogs.reuters.com weblog

07:03 January 18th, 2007

The use of Photoshop

Posted by: David Schlesinger
Tags: Uncategorized

david-schlesinger 2.jpgPhotoshop is a highly sophisticated image manipulation programme. We use only a tiny part of its potential capability to format our pictures, crop and size them and balance the tone and colour.

Materially altering a picture in Photoshop or any other image editing software will lead to dismissal.
 
THE RULES ARE: 
 No additions or deletions to the subject matter of the original image.
   (thus changing the original content and journalistic integrity of an image)
 
 No excessive lightening, darkening or blurring of the image.
   (thus misleading the viewer by disguising certain elements of an image)
 
  No excessive colour manipulation.
    (thus dramatically changing the original lighting conditions of an image)
 
THE GUIDELINES ARE:

 Only minor Photoshop work should be performed in the field.
(Especially from laptops). We require only cropping, sizing and levels with resolution set to 300dpi. Where possible, ask your regional or global picture desks to perform any required further Photo-shopping on their calibrated hi-resolution screens. This typically entails lightening/darkening, sharpening, removal
of dust and basic colour correction.
 
 When working under prime conditions, some further minor Photo-shopping (performed within the above rules) is acceptable.

This includes basic colour correction, subtle lightening/darkening of zones, sharpening, removal of dust and other minor adjustments that fall within the above rules. Reuters recommendations on the technical settings for these adjustments appear below.  The level of Photoshop privileges granted to photographers should be at the discretion of the Chief/Senior Photographers within the above guidelines. All photographers should understand the limitations of their laptop screens and their working environments.

Photographers should trust the regional and global pictures desks to carry out the basic functions to prepare their images for the wire.  All EiCs and sub editors from regional and the global desks will be trained in the use of Photoshop by qualified Adobe trainers to a standard set by senior pictures staff.  The photographer can always make recommendations via the Duty Editor. Ask the desk to lighten the face, darken the left side, lift the shadows etc. Good communication with the desk is essential.
 
TECHNICAL GUIDELINES:
 
Cloning, Healing or Brush Tools are not to be used. The single exception to this rule is sensor dust removal. The cloning tool will only be used below the 100 pixels radius setting. Unless performed on a well-calibrated screen under good working conditions we strongly recommend photographers to request dust removal by pictures desks.
 
Saturation should not be used. It affects image quality and cannot be judged well on a laptop screen and adds nothing more than what can be achieved in levels.

Colour Balance adjustment should be kept to the minimum, especially on laptop
screens which tend to have a blue dominance.
 
Levels should only be adjusted to the start points of the histogram graph on both shadows and highlights.
 
Auto Levels should not be used.
 
The Burn Tool in most cases should only used to subtly darken areas that have been overexposed. When the burn tool is used in shadows a visible element of everything that can be seen in the raw file must remain visible.
 
Highlights and Shadows can be toned by using the selective highlights tool, a feather of 25-30 and then adjusted in curves.
 
The Lasso Tool should not be used when using a laptop to file pictures. It is essential that great care is taken with this tool to avoid the halo effect which is produced when the feathering is too great and the tonal change bleeds over into the unselected zone. Likewise, not enough feathering will produce a vivid jagged edge to the lasso area. Typically a feathering setting of between 5 and 20 pixels is used, depending on the size and positioning of the zone. Again we strongly recommend this is handled by desks.
 
The Eye Dropper can be used on a neutral gray area to set colour. But is dependent on the quality of the computer screen to determine if you are in fact seeing a real gray!
Sharpening should be set at zero (0) in the camera. Pictures may then be sharpened by  300% at a radius of 0.3, threshold 0, in Photoshop.
 
No selective area sharpening should be done.
 
Third-party Sharpening Plug-ins is not permitted.
 
Third-party Noise-Reduction Plug-ins should be avoided but are acceptable if Chief Photographers are convinced they are being used properly.
 
Camera Settings, in particular saturation (and Image Styles in the Canon 5D)
should be set to standard with the exception of in-camera sharpening which
should be turned OFF. The Color setting Adobe RGB is the Reuters standard.
 
Multiple-Exposure pictures must be clearly identified in the caption and drawn to the attention of pictures desks before transmission.
 
To Recap:
 
ALLOWED: 
 
 Cropping     
 Adjustment of Levels to histogram limits
 Minor colour correction 
 Sharpening at 300%, 0.3, 0   
 Careful use of lasso tool   
 Subtle use of burn tool   
 Adjustment of highlights and shadows 
 Eye dropper to check/set gray  

NOT ALLOWED:

 Additions or deletions to image
 Cloning & Healing tool (except dust)
 Airbrush, brush, paint
 Selective area sharpening
 Excessive lightening/darkening
 Excessive colour tone change
 Auto levels
 Blurring
 Eraser tool
 Quick Mask
 In-camera sharpening
 In-camera saturation styles
 
The above list is not exhaustive. Duty editors will be available to answer any questions on use of other functions not mentioned above including latest CS2 and upcoming CS3 functions.
                                    SET-UPS/STAGING OF PICTURES

Reuters photographers, staff and freelance, must not stage or re-enact news events. They may not direct the subjects of their images or add, remove or move objects on a news assignment. Our news photography must depict reality. Any attempt to alter that reality constitutes fabrication and can lead to disciplinary action, including dismissal.

Photographers may direct the subjects of portraits, formal interviews and non-news feature images needed to illustrate a story. The caption must not mislead the reader into believing these images are spontaneous.

The presence of the media can often influence how subjects behave. When the behavior shown is the result of the medias presence, our captions must make that clear.  If photographers from outside Reuters orchestrate or set up scenes, it is still a set-up. 

The best news photography occurs when the presence of the camera is not noticeable. Photographers should be as unobtrusive as possible to avoid influencing events and consider using long lenses.

Composite images that show the progression of an event (e.g. lunar eclipse, time lapse) must indicate the technique in their captions. They are never acceptable in a news assignment. Captions must also make clear when a specialty lens (e.g. lens babies, tilt-shift lenses) or a special technique (e.g. soft focus, zooming) has been used to create an image in portraiture or on a features assignment.

Handout images from outside sources should be examined carefully for accuracy and news value. Questionable handout images will be reviewed by the Duty Editor in Charge, whose decision is final on whether they are published. Photographers or Editors who pass on handout images must alert the Duty EIC if the image is suspect.

ACCURACY IN CAPTIONS:
Just as our news photographs must reflect reality, so too should our captions. They must adhere to the basic Reuters rules of accuracy and freedom from bias and must answer the basic questions of good journalism.  Who is in the picture? Where was it taken? When was it taken? What does it show? Why is a subject doing a particular thing?

Captions are written in the present tense and should use concise, simple English. They generally consist of a single sentence but a second sentence should be added if additional context or explanation is required.

Contentious information, like death tolls in conflict, must be sourced. The caption must explain the circumstances in which a photograph was taken and state the correct date.

Captions must not contain assumptions by the photographer about what might have happened, even when a situation seems likely. Explain only what you have witnessed. All other information about an event must be sourced unless you are certain of your information.

Captions also should not make assumptions about what a person is thinking e.g. England captain David Beckham ponders his future after his team was knocked out of the World Cup soccer finals … Stick to what the photo shows and what you know.

The Duty Editor-in-Charge will come back to the photographer or the Chief Photographer with questions if the caption does not fully explain the image. For this reason, photographers must remain contactable until their work is published.

SENSITIVE IMAGES IN CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS:
Some of our photographs are taken under controlled conditions in which photographers cannot operate freely. This is particularly true during conflicts and in countries where the medias movements are restricted.

Such photographs must say if the image was taken during an organised or escorted visit unless the photographer was truly free to work independently. The circumstances can usually be indicated in a short, second sentence in the caption. For examples, please see Appendix A of the complete Guide to Caption-Writing for Reuters.

PHOTO OPPORTUNITIES:
Reuters does not stage news photos. Sometimes, subjects may strike an artificial pose, such as at a product launch, a show business event or a sports victory ceremony or when requested to do so to illustrate a feature. In some circumstances, such as during demonstrations, civil unrest, street celebrations or conflict, the presence of photographers and television crews may prompt subjects to act abnormally.

These images should be few and can be clichés. They must be clearly captioned to show the reader that the actions are not spontaneous and to explain the context. There are many ways to describe the situation without saying that the subject poses for a photograph, though we should say so when it is clearly the case.

See below a selection of examples. For a more complete set, with pictures, please see Appendix F of the complete Guide to Caption Writing for Reuters.

The Global Pictures Desk will flag any possible issues to the Chief Photographer who carries the responsibility for the file from the region in question.
Caption examples:

An employee of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd shows the media the companys new 32-Gigabit NAND flash memory card (top) and chip during a news conference in Seoul September 11, 2006. Samsung said it has developed the world’s first 32-Gigabit NAND flash memory devices.   REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon (SOUTH KOREA)

Actress Helen Mirren poses with the Coppa Volpi at the Venice Film Festival September 9, 2006. Mirren won the Best Actress award for her role in director Stephen Frears’ movie ‘The Queen’. REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch (ITALY)

A man lies dead in the street May 7 after a NATO daylight air raid near a market over the town of Nis some 200 kilometres south of Belgrade. The Yugoslav army took media to show them damage it said the raid caused to two residential areas and a hospital. REUTERS/Desmond Boylan

Nobel Peace prize winner Wangari Maathai hugs a tree for photographers in Nairobi October 9, 2004. Maathai, a Kenyan, became the first African woman to win the Nobel Peace Prize, the first Nobel given to an environmentalist. REUTERS/Radu Sigheti

A Mexican soccer fan wearing a traditional sombrero waves his countrys flag at a photographer before a Copa America quarterfinal match against Brazil at Miguel Grau stadium in Piura, July 18, 2004. REUTERS/Henry Romero

David Schlesinger is Reuters Editor-in-Chief

48 comments so far

Images are rated in PPI, not DPI. But you must also specify the size of he image along with the PPI or the whole thing is useless. Saying you will only accept 300 PPI (not DPI) images is like saying you must have eigth (8) feet of rope. Okay, what size rope do you want? 1/4 inch? 2 inch? 6 inch?

Moreover any image can be produced at 300 PPI - they will just be small physically.

How would you define a 100 pixel cloning area on an 80 by 65 pixel image?

Wouldn’t it be simpler to just fire the people that you catch cheating or lying? This way other people would clearly understand that you mean business - instead of playing political catch-up games that no one believes?

- Posted by Carl Withrow

I’m pleased to see that you address pre-exposure manipulation too.

Still, I find some pleasure in pointing to the inconsistency between allowing cropping, but disallowing deletions. What is cropping, if not deletion?

I don’t understand the restriction on shift lenses. Shifting is nothing but in-camera cropping. And is cropping with perspective correction allowed?

- Posted by Jan Egil Kristiansen

Oh, yawn.

Journalism is advocacy. It is not scientific notation of empirical observation. Journalism is best when it exposes, explains and promotes a perspective. When a position is posed from someone with a known perspective, the reader/viewer understands the bias and interacts with it; either rejecting or accepting the proposition. If the journalist/photographer is neutral, there is no message and the exercise is a complete waste of time. Abandon the pretense and accept the purpose of journalism. If there is no message, there is no purpose.

- Posted by Pete

Does Reuters really understand the concept of image capture, what a camera sees and what a photographer sees? With film there were obviously manipulations, manipulations to bring out the essence of an moment of news captured by a photographer from what was played out infront of the photographer’s eye and his observance of reality at that time. How can possibly that be removed from the age in digital photography? How can possibly someone at a desk in Reuters make decision of how to alter a photo to reflect a reality that occurred and is news???? That person was not present!!! How can possibly Reuters belive that what is captured with a digital camera is more real to reality that what the key person capturing at site can alter it to?? Obviously a camera does not see reality! It sees what electronics permit in limitations to be captured… this must be manipulated back to what the photographer in essence observed at the moment! I happened to find this article from Reuters with help by http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/00-new-t oday.htm (19 Jan). Please read his writing. He is a professional. I am an amateur. Let me also question Reuters why they are referring to Photoshop and why they are using Photoshop??? I gave up on Photoshop because it is not suited to photography. Please read that sentence again. Why? It does not allow you to move backwards in correction process of a RAW file. Nor does it in any way save a file of that manipulation process. I use Silkypix which does all this! http://www.isl.co.jp/SILKYPIX/english/ and which is written for photography! Photoshop is originally written for graphic manipulations and not photography. The writing by Reuters here is in my opion a big laugh of ignorance of not only photography but also news reporting… I am not a professional photographer but a serious amateur. I am an expatriate engineer and architect with licenses in several countries, so assumably I have some brain to detect the complete nonsense of this writing, also to make judgement of what I have seen photographically in many countries and conditions. In fact this article from Reuters severly leads me to question the news reporting from Reuters. With what they express how can we possibly trust it being reality when they wish to manipulate it to a reality seen by someone in their offices that was not even at location of a news story! How can Reuters possibly as a major news reporter permit such complete lies! Any clarifications from Reuters to this seemingly grand misstep???

- Posted by Anders Loof

“We require only cropping, sizing and levels with resolution set to 300dpi.”

DPI is an often misunderstood parameter.
From digitaljuice.com:
“The general rule is that a 300 dpi image is required for most higher-end print jobs. However, this value of 300 dpi is relative. Since dpi means dots per inch (and is equivalent to pixels per inch for our purposes here) it is meaningless unless you also know what size your image is in inches. A more meaningful measure for a computer image is its pixel dimension. This value is absolute. It should not change when you change dpi values.”

- Posted by Circuitsmith

I think the whole problem here springs from the fact that anyone seriously thinks that ANY photo could record “the truth”.
Every photo is the result of subjective decisions made by someone: first, the camera maker; second, the photographer; third, the person who manipulates the image to achieve a visible format; fourth, the person that actually translates the image to that visible format; fifth, the person that views the image influenced by their particular prejudice; and lets not forget the mechanical whims of the device itself.
Which one has more right to manipulate the image than any other? I would posit that the photographer who actually captures the photo has the main right here. I think copyright law totally agrees. Which I think makes ANY photograph a work of art NOT NEWS.
I think basic integrity is something that can’t be dictated–the wily will always find ways and means to evade the letter of the law–but needs to be recognized and acknowledged over time-trust is built-or destroyed-as in the case of the DISHONEST PHOTOGRAPHER that was the genesis of all this waste of time-he weeded himself out-didn’t he?
And as far as honesty: What then about reuter’s choice as to which photo and at what density etc. etc. etc. that they choose to publish? Doesn’t that manipulate the objective truth to THEIR fiduciary benefit? I think there already is a quid pro quo here that inherently clouds their judgement of what is “truth” and what is “honest”: Money.
Fear of losing it. Fear of not making a sufficient amount. So to protect their money, they impose restrictions on others’ interpretations of our purely subjective world and hypocritically posit that that their own manipulation of reality, or restrictions on decisions of vision by others, is valid and morally (or better financially) irreprehensible? COME ON!
Oh, and turning off in camera sharpening is totally stupid if not impossible.

- Posted by Manfred Zettl

Cropping is deleting, if you think about it, it forces the viewer to focus on what you want them to see.

Lemmings R Us

- Posted by belowme

I don’t know of any camera that allows sharpening to be completely disabled. You can adjust the level, but not turn it off. I could be mistaken, but I think it is a necessary step in the process of digital picture processing in a camera…

- Posted by Jeff

As someone who corrects images in Photoshop for NON-journalistic applications I do have a couple of questions about these rules. The brush tool is off limits, but what about making a Levels adjustment layer and painting on the layer mask so that the levels only applies to one zone of an image? It has the same effect as dodging or burning but gives you much more control over the effect than those tools. If you want people to avoid the lasso tool when selecting zones for lightening or darkening with is wrong with either this method or the Quick Mask for exposure correction?

- Posted by JJ

Re. my post on setting the midpoint in levels: you must mean that the master channel only should be used. This isn’t best practice (really you should use the various channels in curves also) but it would work for you. The rules don’t spell this out however. There’s also the issue of what really is the start of data at the endpoints as it’s so common to have a minuscule amount of data at the shadow and highlight ends before one really gets any data to speak of. If you mean the very first sign of data you’ll end up with low contrast in a lot of images.

- Posted by Alex Stewart

Because of the link between color balance and contrast in all but LAB color spaces, not letting the midpoint be reset in levels is bound to lead to some strange colors.
I do recognize the challenge here - how do you use rules to differentiate standard improvements from editorial changes in an image.

- Posted by Alex Stewart

Levels can alter the image dramatically too. Glad to see you put in limitations and constraints for this though.

News organizations should (if they don’t already) teach their editors and staff:

-how a digital image looks different than film (it is usually easy to spot the difference)

-how a well doctored digital image can NOT be spotted by the naked eye and certainly without blowing up the image.

-how a poorly doctored image can easily be spotted.

Perhaps if news organizations hired photographers on contract, they could provide them a modified version of photoshop, ie, on their field laptop photoshop includes use of certain tools, but not others - Adobe would probably agree to do this for news organizations because they are so large. Then, only pre-screened installed software would be allowed to be installed on the laptop so they couldnt have two copies of photoshop or another edit program. Lastly, the image edit program (photoshop or whatever you use) could digitally stamp the photo so the editor knew it was coming out of that specific software package and could NOT be altered because those settings were already turned off.

Just an idea :)

Mike
photoshop expert using it since 1989

- Posted by Mike

Denise, you say “My philosophy was if I couldnt do it in an old fashioned dark room, I wouldnt attempt to do it with Photoshop.”

Photographs have always been manipulated, even in the ‘old fashioned darkroom’. Anyone who disagrees should take a look at the books like ‘The Commissar Vanishes’ by David King.

And remember, the Soviets weren’t the only ones to doctor images!

- Posted by Nicola

One item that is not covered in this list of do’s and don’ts is the use of pixelling. Pixelling tells me that for reasons of privacy or security something is being hidden, but that no attempt is being made to mislead or deceive the reader.

Who, in Reuters makes the decision as to when pixelling should be used?

- Posted by Martin

No, Philip, it is the job and responsibility of the photographer to caption.

- Posted by Nina

I hope I got my maths right!
I am a customer of your output not a photographer - I read papers.
Your revised policies do sound completely laudable to me. I understand, however, that some camera makers now, and certainly Nikon, provide software that guarantees the authenticity of an image as it leaves the camera.
Perhaps, for emotionally charged images, your editors might as a standard policy, compare all submitted photographs with the authenticated original to check and see precisely what modifications, if any, may have been made.

- Posted by Clive Minchom

As both a photojournalist and ardent Photoshopper for over 12 years, the allure of making a photo look better in print was always there. Wanting to smooth a persons skin or even put hair back into place was an ever-present temptation, although messing with the content of the photo never crossed my mind. My philosophy was if I couldnt do it in an old fashioned dark room, I wouldnt attempt to do it with Photoshop. Digital manipulation is an ever present risk in our world, and having standards like yours will hopefully insure what the public sees is an absolute true representation of the news.

- Posted by Denise

Where possible, particularly when english is not the first language of a photographer, a journalist in the office should write the capition or edit it before it goes to the photo desk. This is also a very good way for reporters to develop a good working relationship with photographers.

- Posted by Philip Pullella

I have a suggestion that may help establish the “trust” mentioned in the Photoshop policy(”Photographers should trust the regional and global pictures desks … ” ).

Give the photographers opportunity to compare the final result with their initial image. Of course they could scan the wire for their own image, but a much more purposeful effort would be the following: Every photographer has some kind of “Reuters account”, and when they log in, they see there all of the photos they have ever submitted, *and* if the picture was used, see the final picture with the submitted picture. You could even display the name of the operator who did the final manipulations. The photographer then gets a sense of the workflow and of the team and can see the competence of the regional office right there in their work product (the finished wire picture).

- Posted by Owen Kelly

This will not stop all unethical photo journalism, but hopefully will raise the standard. By setting clear standards,questionable photos will become less prevalent. I have a teen that uses photoshop techniques for reports etc. We’ve talked about how important it is to make a clear distinction between a photoshopped joke image and the real deal. You will have your work cut out for you as her generation become photo journalists.

- Posted by albert riojas

Post Your Comment

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.