<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seen and not heard at Davos?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/01/27/seen-and-not-heard-at-davos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/01/27/seen-and-not-heard-at-davos/</link>
	<description>Just another Blogs.reuters.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Judy Moody-Stuart</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/01/27/seen-and-not-heard-at-davos/#comment-111725</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Moody-Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/2007/01/27/seen-and-not-heard-at-davos/#comment-111725</guid>
		<description>By the way, these are my four reasons for suggesting that the UN move from NY to Jerusalem - not in any significant order -
	the US government and people seem to not want, nor respect the current UN operation;
	many of the current NY-based UN Diplomats arrive late, make pre-prepared statements then just swan off from a General Assembly session without listening to other countries interventions - a more appropriate and engaged sort of diplomat would be attracted to a UN HQ service located in Jerusalem  
	the financial spin-off to business from hosting the UN diplomats would go into the Israel-Palestine Middle East economy rather than the already-rich New York City;
	the city of Jerusalem would be designated international and administered by Israel and Palestine (as with Spitsbergen/Svalbard which is currently administered by Norway for the international community post WWII)and this would solve the Three Abrahamic Religions ownership-issue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, these are my four reasons for suggesting that the UN move from NY to Jerusalem - not in any significant order -<br />
	the US government and people seem to not want, nor respect the current UN operation;<br />
	many of the current NY-based UN Diplomats arrive late, make pre-prepared statements then just swan off from a General Assembly session without listening to other countries interventions - a more appropriate and engaged sort of diplomat would be attracted to a UN HQ service located in Jerusalem<br />
	the financial spin-off to business from hosting the UN diplomats would go into the Israel-Palestine Middle East economy rather than the already-rich New York City;<br />
	the city of Jerusalem would be designated international and administered by Israel and Palestine (as with Spitsbergen/Svalbard which is currently administered by Norway for the international community post WWII)and this would solve the Three Abrahamic Religions ownership-issue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
