<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gaza photo&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/06/13/gaza-photo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/06/13/gaza-photo/</link>
	<description>Just another Blogs.reuters.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlene</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/06/13/gaza-photo/#comment-199723</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 13:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/2007/06/13/gaza-photo/#comment-199723</guid>
		<description>That's actually funny. "Hey, we should get Dad's picture out! Reuters is here!"

I wonder if Haniyeh's wife or the son's wife appreciated his redecorating. In the homes of most of the Muslims I know in Canada, the home is the woman's business, and the man redecorates, etc. at his own peril.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s actually funny. &#8220;Hey, we should get Dad&#8217;s picture out! Reuters is here!&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder if Haniyeh&#8217;s wife or the son&#8217;s wife appreciated his redecorating. In the homes of most of the Muslims I know in Canada, the home is the woman&#8217;s business, and the man redecorates, etc. at his own peril.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian L.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/06/13/gaza-photo/#comment-199708</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 13:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/2007/06/13/gaza-photo/#comment-199708</guid>
		<description>Editor,

Thank you for the explanation on how things like this happen.  At what point does Reuters look at the evidence presented by its photographers, and declare that due to manipulation of the scene, that it would be best &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; to transmit the photographs to clients?  After all, if the background of these images has been tampered with, &lt;i&gt;how can you verify for certain&lt;/i&gt; that nothing &lt;i&gt;else&lt;/i&gt; has been?

Most Respectfully,
Brian/snapped shot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editor,</p>
<p>Thank you for the explanation on how things like this happen.  At what point does Reuters look at the evidence presented by its photographers, and declare that due to manipulation of the scene, that it would be best <i>not</i> to transmit the photographs to clients?  After all, if the background of these images has been tampered with, <i>how can you verify for certain</i> that nothing <i>else</i> has been?</p>
<p>Most Respectfully,<br />
Brian/snapped shot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
