<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facing the future of news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/07/11/facing-the-future-of-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/07/11/facing-the-future-of-news/</link>
	<description>Just another Blogs.reuters.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thelma</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/07/11/facing-the-future-of-news/#comment-223828</link>
		<dc:creator>Thelma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 06:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/2007/07/11/facing-the-future-of-news/#comment-223828</guid>
		<description>i totally agree with you when you say that all your users really wants is a good story.
i think multimedia helps even a bad story become good. but then again like you said each story should be told using the appropriate medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i totally agree with you when you say that all your users really wants is a good story.<br />
i think multimedia helps even a bad story become good. but then again like you said each story should be told using the appropriate medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/07/11/facing-the-future-of-news/#comment-214933</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/2007/07/11/facing-the-future-of-news/#comment-214933</guid>
		<description>Dean, two more Reuters staffers were just reported killed in Iraq (New York Times). It is very well to support and promote protections for journalists in a general way, and I applaud you for it. But can you explain to us what steps Reuters itself takes to protect the safety of its own employees and freelancers? I recently saw an interview with a BBC correspondent covering violence in Rio de Janeiro, and he explained a bit about BBC policies on staff safety in danger zones. Does Reuters have such policies as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean, two more Reuters staffers were just reported killed in Iraq (New York Times). It is very well to support and promote protections for journalists in a general way, and I applaud you for it. But can you explain to us what steps Reuters itself takes to protect the safety of its own employees and freelancers? I recently saw an interview with a BBC correspondent covering violence in Rio de Janeiro, and he explained a bit about BBC policies on staff safety in danger zones. Does Reuters have such policies as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
