<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN to Reuters: buh-bye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/08/30/cnn-to-reuters-buh-bye/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/08/30/cnn-to-reuters-buh-bye/</link>
	<description>Just another Blogs.reuters.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on the future of the news publishing industry &#171; Blue Screen Of Duds</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/2007/08/30/cnn-to-reuters-buh-bye/#comment-334601</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on the future of the news publishing industry &#171; Blue Screen Of Duds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/2007/08/30/cnn-to-reuters-buh-bye/#comment-334601</guid>
		<description>[...] revenue that Google got them. Ergo, they have increasingly lesser reasons to carry wire stories, especially with the restrictions that are pushed through in the terms of use, now that multimedia is a staple part of any news [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] revenue that Google got them. Ergo, they have increasingly lesser reasons to carry wire stories, especially with the restrictions that are pushed through in the terms of use, now that multimedia is a staple part of any news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
