<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When the reporter becomes the reported</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/archives/6073/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/archives/6073</link>
	<description>Just another Blogs.reuters.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/archives/6073/comment-page-1#comment-200150</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 07:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/2007/05/05/when-the-reporter-becomes-the-reported/#comment-200150</guid>
		<description>Sean Maguire answers this question in a separate &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.reuters.com/2007/06/13/when-does-reuters-use-the-word-terrorist-or-terrorism/&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean Maguire answers this question in a separate post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Phishin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/archives/6073/comment-page-1#comment-193747</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Phishin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/2007/05/05/when-the-reporter-becomes-the-reported/#comment-193747</guid>
		<description>I would like Reuters to report on its policy of never using the word &quot;terrorist&quot; to describe organizations that make the mass murder of civillians a policy and practice, e.g. Hamas &amp; Hezbollah and Al Queda.  Why does Reuters only use the word &quot;militant&quot;? Why not explain this policy to the readers? Why not tell how many complaints Reuters gets on this issue? What is Reuters afraid of?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like Reuters to report on its policy of never using the word &#8220;terrorist&#8221; to describe organizations that make the mass murder of civillians a policy and practice, e.g. Hamas &amp; Hezbollah and Al Queda.  Why does Reuters only use the word &#8220;militant&#8221;? Why not explain this policy to the readers? Why not tell how many complaints Reuters gets on this issue? What is Reuters afraid of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/blog/archives/6073/comment-page-1#comment-176922</link>
		<dc:creator>AB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 20:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/2007/05/05/when-the-reporter-becomes-the-reported/#comment-176922</guid>
		<description>interesting piece - curious your views on whether you feel Reuters journalists were given equal access to Reuters executives, compared with access provided to other media outlets such as the FT, during the heat of the story last week?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting piece &#8211; curious your views on whether you feel Reuters journalists were given equal access to Reuters executives, compared with access provided to other media outlets such as the FT, during the heat of the story last week?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
