Buffett’s train ride is on a one-way track

November 3, 2009

By Agnes T. Crane and Rolfe Winkler

(Corrects the size of Berkshire’s bid to $26 billion from $34 billion. The $34 billion figure included Burlington shares already owned by Berkshire.)

It’s somehow fitting that Berkshire Hathaway’s largest deal ever would look backward to two industries that helped the United States become a world power: railroads and coal. Warren Buffett even dressed the deal up as a patriotic bet on America’s economic future.

Berkshire’s $26 billion cash and stock bid for Burlington Northern Santa Fe represents a significant premium over the company’s closing share price on Monday. Yet it’s a bet that will pay off only if the economic recovery stays on track and Burlington can keep raising prices.

For decades, rails were a losing proposition as falling prices made it difficult to eke out returns on investment. That changed in 2004, once new investments in the railroad industry began to pay off.

And Burlington is best in class. Robert W. Baird analysts note that Burlington’s return on capital has averaged 11.2 percent over the past five years — the best showing of any U.S. rail.

Its tracks and rights of way near Powder River Basin coal mines are a crown jewel. Not only is coal forecast to play a larger role in our energy future, but cleaner coal is expected to dominate. PRB coal has lower sulfur content than Appalachian coal. More than 90 percent of Burlington’s coal shipments originate in the PRB.

And measured in ton-miles, coal-related revenue accounted for nearly half Burlington’s total in the first nine months of the year.

Renegotiating legacy coal contracts helped give Burlington an edge over its competitors, and another round in 2011 should keep coal shipment prices ahead of inflation, according to Deutsche Bank.

There’s also the rail company’s strong intermodal operation — seamless shipping via containers. Burlington is the largest intermodal carrier, and its Western presence means it’s well positioned for a rebound if consumers stay attached to cheap imports.

But to get Burlington, Buffett is paying up. The deal values the company at 28 times next year’s free cash flow, a hearty multiple that leaves little margin of safety if the economy stalls.

And given the high price, it’s unlikely that Burlington will generate better than mediocre returns for Berkshire shareholders.

Buffett may be willing to pay up because he doesn’t like holding cash. According to its recent quarterly filing, Berkshire has nearly $25 billion on its balance sheet. Given the paltry returns available on cash, Buffett may have no choice but to chase risk along with everyone else.

(Reuters columnist Rolfe Winkler contributed to this article.)


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Great article. You need trains to transport the cheapest energy around. It is all about buying scarce commodities now. The next one will be a cargo airline, then cargo/oil boats, then GM food, then rain, then housing, then IT/Com’s, then space shuttles and then corporate insurance.

Posted by Casper | Report as abusive

Mr. Buffet is a bright and he is rich. The rich now own this country and Mr. Buffet has benefited and his wealth protected from the actions of the government bailout, disproportionately so compared to the typically American who owns a mortgage and is fearful of losing their job or is now unemployed.
It would have been wiser for Mr. Buffet to invest his money in an area of the economy that demonstrates his commitment to future generations, alas he has shown his stripes once again by investing in the old guard. Perhaps with Mr. Buffets political ties he knows that the government will be investing in transportation and his new investment will benefit.

It is yet another show of hands by the elite that they are not willing to take appropriate risk by investing their capital gains, secured by the death of our soldiers and the hard work of American citizens, in America’s new industries but instead are protecting the old.

Evolution works in political systems just as it works in nature. At some point the citizens will take away through force and invest the capital where the current “captains of industry” refuse to invest.
Viva Le Revolution!

Posted by csodak | Report as abusive

The next question is how much of the coal that Burlington ships will end up overseas? Will this raise coal prices, and in the end raise natural gas prices because coal comes into short supply?

Posted by lickahotskillet | Report as abusive