Cash, not China, is Google’s biggest problem

January 21, 2010

Cash, not China, is Google’s  biggest conundrum. More precisely, where should the search giant point its gusher of greenbacks?

The online advertising market recovery and increasing efficiency pushed free cash flow up 44 percent to $2.5 billion in the fourth quarter. Adding that to the company’s $24 billion cash hoard doesn’t make sense — but giving it to shareholders does.

Google’s warning that it may shut down its operations in China in response to cyber-attacks on its business has gained all the attention over the past few weeks. While investors might fear the potential impact of pulling out of one of the fastest-growing search markets, in reality Google’s problem in the Middle Kingdom is relatively small potatoes compared to the challenge of spending its money wisely.

The company, led by Eric Schmidt, the chief executive, says it will invest heavily. Fair enough — revenue increased 17 percent in the fourth quarter from a year earlier, and such growth calls for some extra capacity. But this won’t take that much cash. Capital expenditure was just $289 million in the quarter and even spending twice as much every three months, as Google did in 2007 and 2008, would hardly make a dent in the company’s bank balance.

Of course, Google also sees lots of potential business opportunities it can justify spending money on. Cellular data traffic is going through the roof, and the mobile search market will boom as more consumers buy smartphones. Online software services and social networks are two other high-growth areas rightly highlighted by Google.

Yet even these initiatives are insufficient to answer the question of what Google should do with its cash. It is already pursuing them — yet free cash flow is still rising. It can buy other companies, but Google’s largest acquisition so far was YouTube for $1.7 billion, and that was in stock. So it is unlikely the company can find enough good candidates to justify holding onto so much of the green stuff for acquisitions. Handing a chunk of it to shareholders, through dividends or buybacks, is overdue.

Comments

Or, with todays US Supreme Court decision, it could but the next Congress.

Posted by Pala98 | Report as abusive
 

You are not very smart sir,
take a look at what happened to whole foods after announcing a special div, do some research before you write something. you are clueless.

Posted by dummy123 | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/