<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doubling Nielsen numbers not a cinch for LBO kings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/06/04/doubling-nielsen-numbers-not-a-cinch-for-lbo-kings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/06/04/doubling-nielsen-numbers-not-a-cinch-for-lbo-kings/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:19:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PostItChild</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/06/04/doubling-nielsen-numbers-not-a-cinch-for-lbo-kings/comment-page-1/#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator>PostItChild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/?p=3220#comment-2820</guid>
		<description>Here are the ratings on the ratings company’s planned IPO: The NYT likes Nielsen’s prospects, the WSJ not so much.

Here’s an up to date scorecard — and what Van Morrison might have to say about it all.

http://www.medianewsandviews.com/2010/06/nielsen_ipo/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the ratings on the ratings company’s planned IPO: The NYT likes Nielsen’s prospects, the WSJ not so much.</p>
<p>Here’s an up to date scorecard — and what Van Morrison might have to say about it all.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.medianewsandviews.com/2010/06/nielsen_ipo/'>http://www.medianewsandviews.com/2010/06 &nbsp;/nielsen_ipo/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jstaf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/06/04/doubling-nielsen-numbers-not-a-cinch-for-lbo-kings/comment-page-1/#comment-2751</link>
		<dc:creator>jstaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 01:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/?p=3220#comment-2751</guid>
		<description>To get a 2x on an investment made in 2006 you have an IRR of 18%, that seems like a reasonable return for a business that was changed to survive in the new environment.

The company has focused on the analysis and measurement of customer response, pricing and other unique methodologies that have moved their value beyond access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To get a 2x on an investment made in 2006 you have an IRR of 18%, that seems like a reasonable return for a business that was changed to survive in the new environment.</p>
<p>The company has focused on the analysis and measurement of customer response, pricing and other unique methodologies that have moved their value beyond access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
