Goldman beats SEC on points but leaves chink

July 15, 2010

Neither Goldman Sachs nor the Securities and Exchange Commission comes out of their slugfest looking pretty. But in settling fraud charges without admitting guilt, the Wall Street firm has beaten the regulator on points, despite a record penalty. That doesn’t mean Goldman can leave the ring just yet, though. It has conceded that its disclosure on the mortgage collateralized debt obligation at the heart of the SEC’s case was inadequate. That’s something that could rebound on Goldman and the rest of the finance industry.

Right now, Goldman has to stump up $550 million, the hardest penalty punch the SEC has ever landed on a single Wall Street target. But the firm should be able to roll with it. The settlement represents just 3.4 percent of its compensation bill last year, or the equivalent of the average annual compensation for just 1,100 of its 32,500 employees. That aside, three months in the regulatory sin bin may have taken the edge off Goldman’s appeal with clients — but that’s not clear yet.

Meanwhile settling makes the SEC’s original crusading bombast look overdone. In making its initial accusation of securities fraud the regulator seemed to be targeting an even more punishing financial blow and at least the removal of Goldman’s chief executive, Lloyd Blankfein. But the watchdog has elicited only the admission that the investment bank’s marketing materials were incomplete, along with relatively modest internal changes, some of which were already in the works.

Announcing the settlement on the day the U.S. Senate finally passed the Dodd-Frank regulatory reform bill also looks a tad convenient, though the SEC denies any connection. Rightly or wrongly, the enforcement of the case now comes over as opportunistic all along — from throwing down the fraud charges just days before Goldman’s second-quarter earnings at a time when reform efforts needed a boost, to settling them days before the firm’s next quarterly report with reform legislation on its way to the president’s desk.

All that said, landing one well-placed blow on disclosure could leave a longer-lasting scar on Wall Street. Investors who feel they’re wrongly out of pocket from buying complex securities from Wall Street are bound to pounce on that admission and file lawsuits of their own. That could leave Goldman and its rivals under attack for some time to come.

Comments

This is so typical of what the SEC and FINRA do. They do their audit, and then they come up with the most outlandish accusations, cost the firm excessive amounts of legal fees, then the BD settles for a cash amount, when most of the time, the infractions are quite minor. I can’t say that they shouldn’t be slapped around over the mortgage based securities, but if the regulators don’t understand the product, then how are we ever going to prevent this from repeating itself?

Posted by sb0623 | Report as abusive
 

This is nothing for Goldman Sachs. I hope the judge raise the amount at least triple that.

Posted by axiom321 | Report as abusive
 

Chump change. This just confirms that GS is running the show, not the White House. They can go back to work on building the next bubble.

Posted by Freakishlysmart | Report as abusive
 

All of this is only lip service and a dog and pony show. The nature of the people involved has not changed. They are still the same greedy, overreaching people they have always been. And because of this, any new rules and regulations put in place will only be circumvented again once some time has passed.

Our human nature is the cause of our problems, not wall street, and not Washington. All outward attempts to change the system will fail miserably. Only individual people making small changes in their own lives will solve the problems we have right now.

http://www.kabbalah.info

Posted by Benny_Acosta | Report as abusive
 

[...] who bought money-losing derivatives, which could leave Goldman – and its rivals – constantly under attack. But the biggest question now: Who will the SEC come after next? 6 comments! Share and [...]

 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/