<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Goldman rebasing comp at a lower level?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/07/20/is-goldman-rebasing-comp-at-a-lower-level/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/07/20/is-goldman-rebasing-comp-at-a-lower-level/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDNrebel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/07/20/is-goldman-rebasing-comp-at-a-lower-level/comment-page-1/#comment-3107</link>
		<dc:creator>CDNrebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/?p=3588#comment-3107</guid>
		<description>PR is a powerful tool, and the GS PR machine is in high gear. It&#039;s enough to make one skeptical of their earnings report, ie whether or not it was doctored up to be LOWER than actual so as to get it off America&#039;s radar for a while. Ya, it&#039;s pretty &#039;conspiracy nut&#039; type talk, but given how much flak they just went through maybe it&#039;s not such a stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PR is a powerful tool, and the GS PR machine is in high gear. It&#8217;s enough to make one skeptical of their earnings report, ie whether or not it was doctored up to be LOWER than actual so as to get it off America&#8217;s radar for a while. Ya, it&#8217;s pretty &#8216;conspiracy nut&#8217; type talk, but given how much flak they just went through maybe it&#8217;s not such a stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
