HSBC getting back to form

August 2, 2010

HSBC is getting back to form. A sharp fall in impairments at the bank’s U.S. operations, coupled with a strong performance from its investment bank, helped drive a doubling in first-half earnings.

Impairments in the behemoth’s troubled U.S. personal financial services business fell more than 40 percent to $4.6 billion. Declining credit losses in Latin America and Europe were also a big boost to profits.

Lower loan losses will only take HSBC so far. Fortunately, it is also showing growth in the right places. Its investment bank generated revenue of $10.8 billion, the division’s second best performance ever. It only made more money in the heady first half of 2009, when share and bond issues were flying off the shelves and there were bumper profits to be made on the trading floor. But HSBC is now making more money in investment banking than it did before the crisis. Few banks can make that claim.

Meanwhile, the top line is growing nicely at the Asian commercial businesses and falling sharply in U.S. retail which is being wound down. This constitutes a healthy rebalancing of its activities towards higher growth markets.

Still, there is only so much HSBC can do on its own. While the low interest rate environment is making it easier for borrowers around the world to pay off their debts, it is acting as a drag on HSBC’s earnings. The net interest margin has fallen to 2.8 percent, from 3.1 percent in the first half last year.

The profit rebound allowed HSBC to increase its Tier 1 capital ratio by 70 basis points, despite paying out around $2 billion in dividends. That hefty capital base doesn’t flatter HSBC’s profitability. At 9.3 percent, its return on equity is well below its 15-19 percent target. If the U.S. business moves back into profit and other trends continue, HSBC should be able to creep into its target range. But getting to the middle or top will be tough.

Comments

HSBC acted as a “Correspondent Bank” for Stanford International Bank.
HSBC failed to follow guidelines set down by the Financial Action Task Force, The Basel Accords and the Wolfberg Group in their role as correspondent bank for Stanford. They failed to do a simple check on where the money was destined and follow recommendations concerning Offshore Banks. The fact that the money was going to Antigua (and Antigua is on a suspect list of money laundering countries) should have made them extra vigilant.
HSBC failed to carry out the most basic of checks on SIB and Allen Stanford and failed to follow transfer instructions. In not acting with the recommended due diligence,and by not following the guidelines laid down for banks, HSBC aided and abetted Allen Stanford in transferring money to other (non specified) accounts. HSBC are unable to confirm customers deposits reached their intended destination and beneficiary accounts and refuse to disclose where in fact the funds were diverted to

Posted by PaulGWorcs | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/