For-profit colleges get schooled by new reality

August 16, 2010

The for-profit colleges have just been enrolled in the school of hard knocks. Many of these educators spent the past decade feeding happily on federal loans to students — many of which default. New data released on Monday suggest just how tough the future may be for the sector, sending many shares down 10-20 percent. More regulation and higher costs are coming.

The government is now cracking down. The U.S. Education Department has proposed restricting admissions growth or cutting federal funding if not enough students can repay their loans. This would partly be based on starting salaries following graduation. The significance of these new schoolyard rules can’t be understated: federal aid makes up at least three-quarters of revenue at many for-profit educators.

Preliminary estimates suggest many of the big schools will get hit. Corinthian Colleges, the Washington Post’s Kaplan Higher Education, ITT Educational Services, and DeVry had estimated overall loan repayment rates that would fall well below the 45 percent proposed threshold.

Some of them say the government’s figures were too harsh. Consolidated loans in which student borrowers were only paying interest were not counted as being repaid. They may have a point — not all of these will go bust. But the housing crisis has shown that consumers often default on loans when the principal isn’t being chipped away at.

Companies in compliance with the proposal may appear to be bargains. Bellwether Apollo Group, for one, is trading at seven times estimated earnings for the next fiscal year. But hearings in the Senate earlier this year highlighted abuses among recruiters at several schools. More congressional scrutiny is promised, which will increase pressure on the Obama administration to impose further restrictions and enforce existing ones more rigorously.

Enrollments will presumably shrink. And there could be a scramble among for-profit colleges to find those high-quality students who are least likely to default — which means higher recruitment costs and, perhaps, salaries for teachers. The sector’s era of heady growth and high margins increasingly looks like history.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

It stands to reason that default on school loans will follow the general flow of default on bank payments, mortages and the slower economy. More regulations are not necessary if present ones are enforced, which means more staff to enforce them. There have been too many cutback already in this sector of government because student loans has never been a priority for the past 3 administrations. Part of the solution is to increase enforement employment levels to the 1997 levels and the high quality students will not be forced to default on their loans.

Posted by Justice4Sale | Report as abusive

All of this comes at a time when for-profit schools are stealing students from state backed schools, thus the reason it’s being brought up in Congress. The truth of the matter is, for-profit or state run, it doesn’t matter. If we were to put state run schools under the same scrutiny as for-profit schools, I’d be willing to wager that the percentage of defaulted students and unemployed students would be comparable. Are there dirty for profit schools out there? Of course! But, the minority does not define the full industry.

Full disclosure: I’m a graduate of a state run university who now works for a for-profit school.

Posted by Aaron_Porter_is | Report as abusive