Obama’s offensive may not charm business or GOP

September 7, 2010

President Barack Obama’s economic offensive may not charm business or Republicans. The president’s plans to spend $50 billion on roads and railways and grant businesses $300 billion of investment tax credits have merit. But they don’t look enough to sway a disillusioned corporate America already wondering about the fate of $4 trillion in soon-to-expire tax cuts from the Bush years. And the GOP is in no rush to pass a second stimulus before looming midterm elections.

In a less toxic atmosphere, Obama’s ideas would have stronger legs. A national infrastructure bank has long been a favorite of liberal policy wonks and White House advisers. Republicans have been quick to deride the idea as more of the $814 billion stimulus from last year they already consider ineffective. If the bank was structured to reduce taxpayer risk — key elements would include political independence and a focus on revenue-producing projects — the GOP might well go along.

Corporate tax breaks should be an even easier sell. Obama wants companies to be able to deduct 100 percent of the cost of capital investments made in 2010 and 2011 — a tax break worth some $200 billion over two years. Republicans and their corporate contributors have been pushing such an idea as an alternative to more government spending. And while both would prefer a broader tax cut, permanently extending an R&D tax credit, at a cost of $100 billion over 10 years, is a reasonable substitute.

But politics probably will get in the way. Republicans aren’t likely to vote for more spending on infrastructure when doing so would mitigate their criticism of the original stimulus bill, a pillar of their campaign to retake Congress. Nor are they likely to embrace temporary business tax cuts that would be offset by permanent tax increases, such as higher investment and income taxes. Even Democrats may hesitate because of the potentially modest impact on economic growth and employment.

Executives unhappy with the administration have been tossed a bone. They may appreciate the gesture. But it also will be easily lost in an accumulation of bad will from past policy and the uncertain fate of bigger proposals — the Bush tax cuts, the deficit commission and the elections — that could ultimately mean so much more.

Comments

This is a great article. It spells everything out for the American people. Obama’s good ideas to help the economy and create jobs won’t be implemented because the Republicans want the Bush tax cuts extended. These ideas come from the Republican play book. The Republicans would rather obstruct progress once again and don’t care about being seen as the party of “No” because the Bush tax cuts, the deficit commission and the elections ultimately mean so much more.

Posted by joy6625 | Report as abusive
 

Yeah, maybe if President Obama had seen fit to show some leadership two years ago with bold ideas like these — you know, instead of handing off approval to Nancy Pelosi to cobble together a $880 billion pile of wish list items from her special interest cronies — we could’ve moved the country forward.

Seriously, I remember Obama talking about how to needed to “rebuild our crumbling roads, schools, and bridges” during his campaign. Somehow, that got swept aside in favor of… oh, what was it he funded with the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act? It sure wasn’t much in the way of reinvestment. It was those “shovel-ready” projects that were sitting on the fence precisely because they weren’t worth funding.

Posted by JamieSamans | Report as abusive
 

This son-of-Stimulus is a transparent election eve political gasp. The average working stiff is not going to be fooled again. Promising to spend other people’s money to help union workers for one last gasp to get them to the polls is condenscending to American voters. We get it. President Obama will promise the moon when he needs you, but after that, you are yesterday’s issue. Lets make this perfectly clear. :)

Posted by KEAN | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/