<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Buy China&#8221; makes sense only in China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/09/13/buy-china-makes-sense-only-in-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/09/13/buy-china-makes-sense-only-in-china/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jean-d.frey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/09/13/buy-china-makes-sense-only-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-3751</link>
		<dc:creator>jean-d.frey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/?p=4029#comment-3751</guid>
		<description>Chinese government-related companies are also pragmatic. In a case I know, they paid retired but talented American engineers for the development of products in a catch-up strategy. It is discrete, it sounds like &quot;R&amp;D in China&quot; and &quot;Chinese product&quot;, and it is successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chinese government-related companies are also pragmatic. In a case I know, they paid retired but talented American engineers for the development of products in a catch-up strategy. It is discrete, it sounds like &#8220;R&#038;D in China&#8221; and &#8220;Chinese product&#8221;, and it is successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: optimism</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/09/13/buy-china-makes-sense-only-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-3705</link>
		<dc:creator>optimism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 03:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/?p=4029#comment-3705</guid>
		<description>This Trade Imbalance is natural consequence of all our Deficit Spending both public and private. In the most understandable words, China buys our Govt Bonds. Last I heard they do not ship galleons of gold. Directly or indirectly they send either their goods or their currency. And what would you and your trader do with a closet full of yuan? You would buy the best value with it. And chain stores are full of the evidence, period. This will continue as long as we need China to finance our profligate deficit spending.
Our elected &quot;-wake up&quot; in November--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Trade Imbalance is natural consequence of all our Deficit Spending both public and private. In the most understandable words, China buys our Govt Bonds. Last I heard they do not ship galleons of gold. Directly or indirectly they send either their goods or their currency. And what would you and your trader do with a closet full of yuan? You would buy the best value with it. And chain stores are full of the evidence, period. This will continue as long as we need China to finance our profligate deficit spending.<br />
Our elected &#8220;-wake up&#8221; in November&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/09/13/buy-china-makes-sense-only-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-3703</link>
		<dc:creator>Neander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 03:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/?p=4029#comment-3703</guid>
		<description>Fine analysis. 

China is the first child of globalization, and isn&#039;t it ironic that it is balking at any produce made elsewhere!

The simplistic premiss of globalization is proving to be cultivating infantilism at the collective level. China has been empowered way before it became mature, it sees its wishes as legitimate claims and the so-called trade partners that spoiled that &quot;child&quot; now have a problem on their hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine analysis. </p>
<p>China is the first child of globalization, and isn&#8217;t it ironic that it is balking at any produce made elsewhere!</p>
<p>The simplistic premiss of globalization is proving to be cultivating infantilism at the collective level. China has been empowered way before it became mature, it sees its wishes as legitimate claims and the so-called trade partners that spoiled that &#8220;child&#8221; now have a problem on their hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
