<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three reasons U.S. homeowners shouldn&#8217;t lose hope</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/10/06/three-reasons-u-s-homeowners-shouldnt-lose-hope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/10/06/three-reasons-u-s-homeowners-shouldnt-lose-hope/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:49:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: finneganG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/10/06/three-reasons-u-s-homeowners-shouldnt-lose-hope/comment-page-1/#comment-3987</link>
		<dc:creator>finneganG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/?p=4253#comment-3987</guid>
		<description>This is not good news for homeowners - ridiculous!  Why would owners take solace in the fact that their house is now cheap, relative to disposable income and adjusted to 2001 pricing levels?  (rhetorical, please).  That is a loss of value AND counties continue to tax at a rate that does not reflect the reduced price of the property or structure - they increased taxes while the market value dropped (yes, to offset the loss of revenue from distressed/foreclosed property taxes).

A second wave of house price declines that is less painful - are you kidding me?  Wow - that will make everyone feel fantastic, and I&#039;m sure the folks that reneged on their lenders&#039; second chance mortgage option feel powerfully happy about that historical fact.

This article is written for the hawks waiting to swoop in and gather up properties and for market speculators - not for homeowners struggling to pay their mortgages, find jobs, and wonder why their property taxes have jumped while everything else of value drops.

Enough with the &quot;feel-good-about-yourself&quot; silliness so the market folks can have fun with manipulating dollars (and sense).  Contemporary facts are relevant; historical trends no longer apply in this world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not good news for homeowners &#8211; ridiculous!  Why would owners take solace in the fact that their house is now cheap, relative to disposable income and adjusted to 2001 pricing levels?  (rhetorical, please).  That is a loss of value AND counties continue to tax at a rate that does not reflect the reduced price of the property or structure &#8211; they increased taxes while the market value dropped (yes, to offset the loss of revenue from distressed/foreclosed property taxes).</p>
<p>A second wave of house price declines that is less painful &#8211; are you kidding me?  Wow &#8211; that will make everyone feel fantastic, and I&#8217;m sure the folks that reneged on their lenders&#8217; second chance mortgage option feel powerfully happy about that historical fact.</p>
<p>This article is written for the hawks waiting to swoop in and gather up properties and for market speculators &#8211; not for homeowners struggling to pay their mortgages, find jobs, and wonder why their property taxes have jumped while everything else of value drops.</p>
<p>Enough with the &#8220;feel-good-about-yourself&#8221; silliness so the market folks can have fun with manipulating dollars (and sense).  Contemporary facts are relevant; historical trends no longer apply in this world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
